--- On Fri, 5/14/10, Ben Pfitzner wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> I had a similar Problem a couple of hours ago. See:
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=AANLkTinaPZe-zie5oyw2HO03wwN6sJwHE1hd7TpGiQIO%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=bacula-users
> What solved it for me was to use a sh
On 05/14/2010 02:02, Denis Shaposhnikov wrote:
> Does anybody has working examples of using s3fs or s3cmd with bacula for
> using Amazon S3 as bacula storage?
>
> I've tried s3fs but it seems bacula 5.0.0 doesn't want to use s3 bucket
> mounted into a directory because it doesn't have "." and "..
Hi Joseph,
I had a similar Problem a couple of hours ago. See:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=AANLkTinaPZe-zie5oyw2HO03wwN6sJwHE1hd7TpGiQIO%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=bacula-users
What solved it for me was to use a shorter password, not kidding. I
used "abc" to test and
John/Carlo..
Thanks for the reply!!
I found the problem.. I'd checked to see iptables status on the client
node, and found it
was off (INPUT default ACCEPT), but I *didn't* check the Bacula "server"
machine.. Stopped
iptables and now it works fine...
Thanks again.. I'm betting I'm gonna have a L
I'm currently using Bacula 5.0.2 on Linux. It's working great with 3 Linux
clients (CentOS and Suse). However, to make things interesting I decided to
try adding a Windows client.
The bacula-fd.exe -t bacula-fd.conf test passes on the Windows client.
However, I did notice if I try to run it f
Hello,
I have read and reread dozens of threads on this board and at this stage am at
my wit's end. I would really appreciate any help that anyone could give me.
My setup is as follows :
bacula 5.0.1 running on a Debian Lenny server(server1)Bacula
MSL 6000 LTO autochanger with 30 slots and one
When changing magazines in an autochanger, the update slots command
let's Bacula know which volumes are currently in-changer. However,for
the next job, Bacula will still select the last volume written to in the
pool being used for the job, though that volume is no longer in-changer,
and even if
Hi,
We've had a couple of threads about this before, but I just tried it now with
Bacula 5.0.2 and just wanted to report my technique. Comments are welcome.
Here's what I did:
1) Wrote a new pool definition:
Pool {
Name = ArchiveMay2010
Pool Type = Backup
Volume Retention = 11 months
Title: Blue Barracuda
Hi Joseph,
This is not a mysql error. The director is waiting to connect to the
client.
Check if you client is reachable from your backupserver.
Regards,
Prashant
On 14/05/10 15:26, Joseph Spenner wrote:
--- On Thu, 5/13/10, Frandin, Dave wrote:
"Error" and
On 5/14/2010 5:44 AM, Giovanni S. wrote:
> Hi,
> i'm designing a backup continuous access strategy with bacula and i need a
> help.
> I have two bacula server with bacula-dir and bacula-sd, i want do the backup
> on two tape libraries with
>
> autochangers and 48 tapes of 800 GB in each tape libra
Hi,
Carlo helped me out one again, thanks again!!!
Problem solved!!!
What Carlo asked me to do was to chance the client FD to the right director:
Messages {
Name = Standard
director = bacula-server01-dir = all, !skipped, !restored
}
and finall
On Wed, 12 May 2010 13:04:20 +0200, Kevin Keane
wrote:
> No, they don't. Microsoft basically takes a very sensible position, in
> my mind: "we only provide a basic tool. If you don't like it, you can
> get third-party tools". Think of Windows Backup (or NTBackup) as the
> backup equivalen
>> 2. Is there a way to have Bacula always start full backups on a new
>> volume, instead of appending? I want the incremental jobs to append
>> to this volume after the full backup job is done. Basically I'm
>> trying to avoid splitting a full backup across two tapes, while
>> keeping the incre
--- On Thu, 5/13/10, Frandin, Dave wrote:
> "Error" and SD termination status
> "Waiting on FD",
> and Termination "*** Backup Error ***"
I'm relatively new to bacula as well, and I saw this same thing happen when I
forgot to build/initialize the mysql database, and/or mysql wasn't running.
Just
Hi,
yesterday I found help here on how to connect to a client, now I still
can't backup a clients. I still think that I don't get the picture on
who has to talk to whom.
General: Debian 5.0 amd64, bacula 5.0.1
FD talked to DIR. DIR talks to SD. No Need for FD to talk to SD, Right?
My Problem n
> On Thu, 13 May 2010 15:41:53 -0700, William Taylor said:
>
> Trying to find out best practices for restoring a stack of tapes to disk
> in a disaster recovery situation (ie datacenter exploded, all I have is
> tapes, drive and server).
>
> I tried running:
>
> bextract -V 10L2 /dev/n
Hi,
i'm designing a backup continuous access strategy with bacula and i need a
help.
I have two bacula server with bacula-dir and bacula-sd, i want do the backup
on two tape libraries with
autochangers and 48 tapes of 800 GB in each tape library; each bacula-sd can
see both the tape libraries.
M
|-Original Message-
|From: Gavin McCullagh [mailto:gavin.mccull...@gcd.ie]
|Sent: 14 May 2010 9:47 AM
|To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
|Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Backups on Nas
|
|Hi,
|
|On Thu, 13 May 2010, mario parreño wrote:
|
|> But I prefer not mounting a unit, I prefer ac
Hi,
On Thu, 13 May 2010, mario parreño wrote:
> But I prefer not mounting a unit, I prefer acceding to the nas directly,
> because I have many folders of different accounts in the nas
> and then I will have that to mount in Debian so many folders since has in the
> nas.
Bacula's backups (as
I have upgrade from 2.4.2 to 5.0.1
I have compiled bacula:
- dump the old db
- restore it on the new server
- check in the /etc/bacula, there are some script to upgrade the old table!
ATTENTION:
--
# Shell script to update MySQL tables from Bacula Enterprise 2.6 to 4.0 or
#
Can You post you dir and fd configuration?
2010/5/14 Frandin, Dave :
> Hello List!
>
> I'm new to Bacula, we have set up a system to serve as an
> evaluation/test Bacula server (director, storage, file daemons, Bacula
> 5.0.1, on CentOS5.4, with a spare SCSI DLT drive). I built the server
> from
2010/5/12 Frank Sweetser
> While this is definitely a neat feature, my biggest concern is that this
> would
> be a gigantic privilege escalation hole. By allowing bconsole to execute
> any
> arbitrary command, it becomes impossible for the general system
> administrator
> to restrict the backup
22 matches
Mail list logo
