On 05/ 6/10 03:11 AM, James Harper wrote:
>> I am also using W2K8 and back up with Windows Backup to an iSCSI
> server.
>>
>> There really is no good way around Windows backup (unless you want a
> paid
>> solution). W2K8 relies heavily on junction points, which bacula
> doesn't back
>> up. BTW, if
> I am also using W2K8 and back up with Windows Backup to an iSCSI
server.
>
> There really is no good way around Windows backup (unless you want a
paid
> solution). W2K8 relies heavily on junction points, which bacula
doesn't back
> up. BTW, if you are using Exchange 2007, be sure to install SP2
On 05/05/2010 04:13 PM, Josh Fisher wrote:
> I think it will have to be a cluster service. The FD has to be available
> at the same IP, same client name, etc., else how will Bacula know it is
> the same FD?
I don't know - because I have some experience with backing up shared
storage with Tivoli
I am also using W2K8 and back up with Windows Backup to an iSCSI server.
There really is no good way around Windows backup (unless you want a paid
solution). W2K8 relies heavily on junction points, which bacula doesn't back
up. BTW, if you are using Exchange 2007, be sure to install SP2 - before
I am trying to build 5.0.2 BAT on a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.6 system using
the source RPM. The build starts fine, but midway through runs into trouble
with
In file included from main.cpp:36:
bat.h:44:17: QtGui: No such file or directory
In file included from mainwin.h:41,
fro
> On Wed, 05 May 2010 15:18:08 +0200, Stefan Muenkner said:
>
> On 04.05.2010 20:32, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> > --- On Tue, 5/4/10, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> >
> >> From: Joseph Spenner
> >> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Installing with RPMs
> >> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> Date:
>> >No way are your SATA drives that fast. More likely 1/4 to 1/3 of that
> If the link is 90 MB/s and drives deliver 1/4 of 375 MB/s(94 MB/s) - that's
> a throughput of about 90 MB/s. That's a whopping speed of 324 GB/hr. You
> must be going through a fiber switch to a striped array of sorts.
>
Ag
>If it's correct on a gigabit link I would have a rate transfer of 90MB/s
...
> and the transfer rate of the sata disks are 3Gb/s(375MB/s).
...
> >No way are your SATA drives that fast. More likely 1/4 to 1/3 of that
If the link is 90 MB/s and drives deliver 1/4 of 375 MB/s(94 MB/s) - that's
a thr
On 5/5/2010 8:16 AM, Jakov Sosic wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a cluster with shared storage which is mounted only on one node
> at a time. Other node's don't have that partition mounted. I wonder,
> what is a way to backup a shared partition?
>
> If I only include partition in filesets of all cluster n
On 04.05.2010 20:32, Joseph Spenner wrote:
> --- On Tue, 5/4/10, Joseph Spenner wrote:
>
>> From: Joseph Spenner
>> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Installing with RPMs
>> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Date: Tuesday, May 4, 2010, 11:29 AM
>> --- On Tue, 5/4/10, Phil Stracchino
>>
>> wro
--- On Wed, 5/5/10, Stefan Muenkner wrote:
> > --- On Tue, 5/4/10, Joseph Spenner
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The suspense was killing me, so I went ahead and
> modified the scripts from the source installation to work
> here. I now have a mysql 'bacula' database.
> However, the Director will still
On 05/05/10 08:16, Jakov Sosic wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have a cluster with shared storage which is mounted only on one node
> at a time. Other node's don't have that partition mounted. I wonder,
> what is a way to backup a shared partition?
>
> If I only include partition in filesets of all cluster no
On 05/05/10 08:38, John Drescher wrote:
>> Sorry my servers are on gigabit links.
>> How do you come to 9MB/s with a 100Mb link, is it not equals to 12,5 MB/s?
>
> Overhead.
>
>> If it's correct on a gigabit link I would have a rate transfer of 90MB/s
>
> You will probably get less than that if
> Hi.
>
> I have a cluster with shared storage which is mounted only on one node
> at a time. Other node's don't have that partition mounted. I wonder,
> what is a way to backup a shared partition?
>
> If I only include partition in filesets of all cluster nodes, that
when
> storage is mounted on
>> and the transfer rate of the sata disks are 3Gb/s(375MB/s).
>
> No way are your SATA drives that fast. More likely 1/4 to 1/3 of that
> speed unless all servers are using high end SSDs.
>
I forgot to mention that this ~100MB/s is only for large sequential
reads. When reads get small or random th
> Sorry my servers are on gigabit links.
> How do you come to 9MB/s with a 100Mb link, is it not equals to 12,5 MB/s?
Overhead.
> If it's correct on a gigabit link I would have a rate transfer of 90MB/s
You will probably get less than that if you do not use jumbo frames.
> and the transfer rate
Hi.
I have a cluster with shared storage which is mounted only on one node
at a time. Other node's don't have that partition mounted. I wonder,
what is a way to backup a shared partition?
If I only include partition in filesets of all cluster nodes, that when
storage is mounted on another node, i
On 04/05/10 13:51, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Am Tue, 04 May 2010 08:34:15 +0200 schrieb Vlamsdoem:
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have few questions about my new backup configuration. Before asking my
>> questions I will give you some useful information about what I need to
>> do.
>> I need a backup ± 10
On 05/ 5/10 09:32 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 05/05/10 14:38, Henrik Johansen wrote:
>> On 05/ 5/10 08:11 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>>> Hi folks
>>>
>>> I've recently been saddled with a win2k8 server, and am trying to figure
>>> out how to make it play with my backup infrastructure.
>>>
>>> Current
On 05/05/10 14:38, Henrik Johansen wrote:
> On 05/ 5/10 08:11 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> Hi folks
>>
>> I've recently been saddled with a win2k8 server, and am trying to figure
>> out how to make it play with my backup infrastructure.
>>
>> Currently I've got it doing scheduled backups via Windows
20 matches
Mail list logo
