Re: [Bacula-users] Windows registry restore possible?

2010-04-27 Thread Thomas Mueller
Am Tue, 27 Apr 2010 12:50:30 -0400 schrieb jdb: > I'm primarily a Linux user, and have been quite happy with Bacula on > Linux. I also have some Windows servers which I'm stuck managing as > well, and I have Bacula configured on those. One of those servers, a > Windows Server 2003 machine, recen

[Bacula-users] Windows registry restore possible?

2010-04-27 Thread jdb
I'm primarily a Linux user, and have been quite happy with Bacula on Linux. I also have some Windows servers which I'm stuck managing as well, and I have Bacula configured on those. One of those servers, a Windows Server 2003 machine, recently managed to corrupt its SOFTWARE registry to the p

[Bacula-users] BAT?

2010-04-27 Thread Joseph Spenner
This may be so obvious that I can't find it.. but where do I find BAT? I'm compiling from source, and thought it would be in bacula-gui. But this appears to be mostly for web applications. I've been using bconsole for everything, but from what I read and saw in screenshots BAT looks a bit simpl

Re: [Bacula-users] limit volume size

2010-04-27 Thread John Drescher
> I'd  like to know it will be possible to limit the volume size, I mean, when > it grows to a limit, bacula should generate a nother volume... > Yes. http://bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Automatic_Volume_Recycling.html You are mainly interested in the following: Use Volume Once = yes V

[Bacula-users] limit volume size

2010-04-27 Thread Jesus arteche
hello, I'd like to know it will be possible to limit the volume size, I mean, when it grows to a limit, bacula should generate a nother volume... Thanks -- ___ Bacula-users mai

Re: [Bacula-users] File volumes doesnt reach Maximun volumes

2010-04-27 Thread Jorge Cabello
OK. Thanks. On Martes, 27 de Abril de 2010 12:45:45 Matija Nalis wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:39:58PM +0200, Jorge Cabello wrote: > > I thought new files were created until Maximum volumes limit was reached. > > They were. But the old files were at the same time deleted according > to rete

Re: [Bacula-users] Ubuntu Lucid

2010-04-27 Thread Daniel Kamm
Am 4/27/10 12:50 PM, schrieb Matija Nalis: > So your options are either to downgrade the client on Lucid (maybe > there can be found a package for 2.4.x version ? You may try to install the Ubuntu package for Karmic Koala or Hardy Heron, which both are 2.4.4. Cheerz, - Dan ---

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrade path from 2.4.x to 5.0.x

2010-04-27 Thread Matija Nalis
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 02:15:35PM +0200, Foo wrote: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:57:53 +0200, Matija Nalis > >> Also, can I expect problems if I added some extra indexes for speed and > >> whatever tables/indexes were added by webacula? > > > > yes, you can expect problems :) > > > > For example, > >

[Bacula-users] show pool command does not display correct Job/File Retention

2010-04-27 Thread yistoneriver
"Show pool" command does not display correct value for Job and File Retention even they are defined in a pool resource. I took a look at a source file (dird_conf.c ) of both 5.0.0 and 5.0.1, and it seemed that the retention periods referred directives of a client resource. Or am I missing ? -yu

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrade path from 2.4.x to 5.0.x

2010-04-27 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:15:35 +0200, Foo said: > > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:06:43 +0200, Martin Simmons > wrote: > > > I suggest checking your current db version by > > select * from version; > > Version 10. > > Is Bacula 2.4.4 dir/sd compatible with a newer database layout (11, 12, > what

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrade path from 2.4.x to 5.0.x

2010-04-27 Thread Foo
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:06:43 +0200, Martin Simmons wrote: > I suggest checking your current db version by > select * from version; Version 10. Is Bacula 2.4.4 dir/sd compatible with a newer database layout (11, 12, whatever?) or do I need to update the dir/sd executables at the same time? > an

Re: [Bacula-users] Ubuntu Lucid

2010-04-27 Thread Ralf Gross
Uwe Schuerkamp schrieb: > Hi folks, > > looks like lucid comes with bacula v5 which seemingly is unable to > talk to our server running bacula 2.4.x: > > bacula-fd -c /etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf -d 99 -f > bacula-fd: filed_conf.c:452-0 Inserting director res: lotus-mon > lotus-fd: filed.c:275-0

Re: [Bacula-users] Ubuntu Lucid

2010-04-27 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:50:08PM +0200, Matija Nalis wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:27:11PM +0200, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > looks like lucid comes with bacula v5 which seemingly is unable to > > talk to our server running bacula 2.4.x: > > Your other clients are all 2.4

Re: [Bacula-users] Ubuntu Lucid

2010-04-27 Thread Matija Nalis
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:27:11PM +0200, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > Hi folks, > > looks like lucid comes with bacula v5 which seemingly is unable to > talk to our server running bacula 2.4.x: Your other clients are all 2.4.x I guess. > following that, there's a "client rejected hello command" mes

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup Catalog Error

2010-04-27 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:31:46 -0400, cuongth1981 said: > > Dear All > I have problem with backup Catalog on bacula 5.0.1. Client use windows 2003. > Error : > > 26-Apr 15:54 fw.giaydepviet.com-dir JobId 2: shell command: run BeforeJob > "/build/bacula/scripts/make_catalog_backup.pl MyCata

Re: [Bacula-users] File volumes doesnt reach Maximun volumes

2010-04-27 Thread Matija Nalis
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:39:58PM +0200, Jorge Cabello wrote: > I thought new files were created until Maximum volumes limit was reached. They were. But the old files were at the same time deleted according to retention period, so you you maximum volume limit was never actually reached.

Re: [Bacula-users] File volumes doesnt reach Maximun volumes

2010-04-27 Thread Jorge Cabello
I thought new files were created until Maximum volumes limit was reached. I will modify the volume retention. Thanks. On Martes, 27 de Abril de 2010 12:04:03 Mike Holden wrote: > Jorge Cabello wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm having problems backing up to files in a hard drive. > > > > I'm using 3

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula Using Incr. Vol. instead of Full Vol.

2010-04-27 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:54:07 -0400, ikkysleepy said: > > A Full Backup was run... How did you run it? If you used then console, then you will need to set the pool manually by using "mod" at the "OK to run?" prompt. __Martin ---

[Bacula-users] Ubuntu Lucid

2010-04-27 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Hi folks, looks like lucid comes with bacula v5 which seemingly is unable to talk to our server running bacula 2.4.x: bacula-fd -c /etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf -d 99 -f bacula-fd: filed_conf.c:452-0 Inserting director res: lotus-mon lotus-fd: filed.c:275-0 filed: listening on port 9102 lotus-fd:

Re: [Bacula-users] File volumes doesnt reach Maximun volumes

2010-04-27 Thread Matija Nalis
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:36:34AM +0200, Jorge Cabello wrote: > I'm using 3 pools: full, differential and incremental. All of the with: > Volume Retention = 1 month > RecycleOldestVolume = yes > > Full Pool (1st of each month): Maximum volumes = 2 > Differential Pool (15th of each month):Maximum

Re: [Bacula-users] File volumes doesnt reach Maximun volumes

2010-04-27 Thread francisco javier funes nieto
Do you change some Pool parameters without update pool from bconsole? this : max_vols=48 differs your Incremental pool config. 2010/4/27 Jorge Cabello : > Hello, > > I'm having problems backing up to files in a hard drive. > > I'm using 3 pools: full, differential and incremental. All of the wit

Re: [Bacula-users] File volumes doesnt reach Maximun volumes

2010-04-27 Thread Mike Holden
Jorge Cabello wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having problems backing up to files in a hard drive. > > I'm using 3 pools: full, differential and incremental. All of the > with: > maximum volume jobs = 1 > Volume Retention = 1 month > AutoPrune = yes > Recycle = yes > MaximumVolumeJobs = 1 > RecycleOldestVo

[Bacula-users] File volumes doesnt reach Maximun volumes

2010-04-27 Thread Jorge Cabello
Hello, I'm having problems backing up to files in a hard drive. I'm using 3 pools: full, differential and incremental. All of the with: maximum volume jobs = 1 Volume Retention = 1 month AutoPrune = yes Recycle = yes MaximumVolumeJobs = 1 RecycleOldestVolume = yes Full Pool (1st of each month):

Re: [Bacula-users] appending to a "full" tape?

2010-04-27 Thread Matija Nalis
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:43:44AM +0200, IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig) wrote: > i'm running bacula 2.4.4 in a debian/etch environment (i know that it is > a bit outdated; but there is even one debian/sarge host that i cannot > really update...) No worries, 2.4.4 is also th

[Bacula-users] appending to a "full" tape?

2010-04-27 Thread IEM - network operating center (IOhannes m zmoelnig)
hi all. i'm running bacula 2.4.4 in a debian/etch environment (i know that it is a bit outdated; but there is even one debian/sarge host that i cannot really update...) bacula is doing a nightly backup ("full" every 3 months or so, "diff" every week, and "incr" every night) onto an autochanger (Q

Re: [Bacula-users] Warning about setting File/Job Retentions in Pool resource!

2010-04-27 Thread Vlad23
Thank you for reply. What retentions are for my task? Can Bacula give me this not so difficult functionality? Situation is next: 1) Bacula can't set Job and Files Retentions for Job resource - only for Pool and Client resources. 2) I can't define Job and Files Retentions in Client Resource, becaus