Is there a way to paginate the response from these list commands? I
have 37k entries in this pool ...
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 17:38 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Brian Clarkson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 16:11 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> >> On Thu, De
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Brian Clarkson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 16:11 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Brian Clarkson wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 15:06 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
>> >> >> Make the volume retention much longer. And then apply th
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 16:11 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Brian Clarkson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 15:06 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> >> >> Make the volume retention much longer. And then apply that to all of
> >> >> your volumes.
> >> >
> >> > Wouldn't the
I have a couple older volumes that I expected to get pruned by now, but they
don't. I am using bacula 3.0.2 on OpenSuSE.
Here is one example:
| 244 | randamai_20091101223426_Full.bacula| Archive
| 1 | 93,005,712,230 | 21 |2,851,200 | 0 |0 |
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Brian Clarkson wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 15:06 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
>> >> Make the volume retention much longer. And then apply that to all of
>> >> your volumes.
>> >
>> > Wouldn't the volume retention period need to be shorter?
>> >
>>
>> Retention pe
Hello,
I'm running Bacula version 2.4.3 on a machine with a single tape
drive, and on occasion the tape will become full overnight. 'status
dir' shows the following:
server1.-MM-DD_HH.MM.SS is waiting on max Storage jobs
Since the machine has plenty of space to spool the data, I'd like
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 3:06 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>>> Make the volume retention much longer. And then apply that to all of
>>> your volumes.
>>
>> Wouldn't the volume retention period need to be shorter?
>>
>
> Retention period is how long to keep the volume before it can be reused.
>
Bacula
>> Make the volume retention much longer. And then apply that to all of
>> your volumes.
>
> Wouldn't the volume retention period need to be shorter?
>
Retention period is how long to keep the volume before it can be reused.
John
--
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 11:34 -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Brian Clarkson wrote:
> > I've re-read the section on volume retention and volume recycling but
> > I'm still confused.
> >
> > My backup files are being reused even though my director is configured
> > to
Gordon Neumann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i want to know if anyone has experience with database encoding at Bacula
> 3.0.2-3.
> Its a lenny-backport package.
> system configuration:
> os: debian lenny
> bacula: 3.0.2-3 lenny-backport
> database: PostgreSQL 8.3
>
> My question in detail.
> The database
Thanks for the help. This got me going in just the right direction.
-Shon
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Brian Debelius <
bdebel...@intelesyscorp.com> wrote:
> The copy job copies all uncopied jobs one job at a time, one job at a time.
> If you need to limit this, you need to use your own sq
I'd like to run a Bacula Job after the successful run of another Bacula job.
Does RunAfterJob only work for external commands, or do I have to fully
define using a RunScript directive?
Thanks,
Shon
--
Return on Informatio
Thank you. Great tip. I won't implement because I'd need to update though.
But it did lead me to the right place.
-Shon
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 24.11.2009 15:47, Mingus Dew wrote:
> > All,
> > Running Bacula 3. on Solaris 10 x86. I'm setting up some
On 12/10/2009 9:33 AM, Hayden Katzenellenbogen wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Here is a quick snap of my top during a full backup.
>
> top - 09:32:35 up 1 day, 18:38, 1 user, load average: 11.41, 11.60,
> 10.75
> Tasks: 161 total, 1 running, 160 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> Cpu0 : 0.3%us, 0.3%sy
Hi,
I've ntoiced problem in the way Bacula is doing incremental backup. I have
one folder to backup and in this folder database is writing log files, I
have new file in every few minutes.
Previous incremental backup ended at 11:07 am. The next incremental backup
started 13:05 so in folder it had l
Steve,
Here is a quick snap of my top during a full backup.
top - 09:32:35 up 1 day, 18:38, 1 user, load average: 11.41, 11.60,
10.75
Tasks: 161 total, 1 running, 160 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu0 : 0.3%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 99.4%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si,
0.0%st
Cpu1 : 13.0%u
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Brian Clarkson wrote:
> I've re-read the section on volume retention and volume recycling but
> I'm still confused.
>
> My backup files are being reused even though my director is configured
> to create new files. Backups are working on schedule but my secondary,
I've re-read the section on volume retention and volume recycling but
I'm still confused.
My backup files are being reused even though my director is configured
to create new files. Backups are working on schedule but my secondary,
rsync-based backup is failing because the filenames and filesizes
uhog-v...@spamex.com wrote:
> Hi everyone. I have a new problem with a particular backup in my environment.
> I'm using bacula 3.0.2 across all components. This has been running fine for
> some time however this particular laptop used to be running linux(recently it
> was switched over to XP).
Hello,
i want to know if anyone has experience with database encoding at Bacula
3.0.2-3.
Its a lenny-backport package.
system configuration:
os: debian lenny
bacula: 3.0.2-3 lenny-backport
database: PostgreSQL 8.3
My question in detail.
The database bacula on my postgreSQL-server has encoding le
20 matches
Mail list logo
