[Bacula-users] Help for a special query : Find all double same file in a job

Hi all. At a customer site, we suspect to have multiple time the same file ( md5 checksum identical ) stored at several place inside the data. This is confirmed by the fact that we have ~2.5 Millions files for a job and only ~1.3 distinct md5 chechsum. I've build a query which retrieve all info

[Bacula-users] Feature Request: Allow schedule to override Next Pool.

Hi. When defining backup strategies, I've wanted to be able to define the 'Next Pool' in the Schedule to override the value defined against a pool. An example of one usage of such a feature follows: I have an incremental pool that each week gets consolidated into a full pool via a VirtualFull

[Bacula-users] PATCH: Allow Copy Jobs to work within one tape library.

Hi. A while ago I tried to set up a backup strategy where I defined three pools. An incremental pool; a full backup pool; and a copy pool. The idea was to run incremental backups forever (except for the first one that would be promoted to a full). Then at the end each week consolidate the increm

Re: [Bacula-users] after building bat, location of binary varies

Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:32:56 -0500, Dan Langille said: >> Martin Simmons wrote: On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:45:43 -0500, Dan Langille said: Folks, I am finding that the location of the executable binary varies from one system to another. I am t

Re: [Bacula-users] virtuafull and verify

"Fahrer, Julian" writes: > Is no one using verify jobs for virtual fulls? > FWIW I do, and I have the same problem. I’m using version 3.0.2. What version are you using? Have you tested the newest version (3.0.3), yet? I don’t have much time at the moment but if no one knows a solution we shou

Re: [Bacula-users] Error with DR backups

> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:29:07 -0500, DAve said: > > 16-Nov 08:25 director-dir: Allied-ex3.2009-11-16_01.00.02 Warning: Error > updating job record. sql_update.c:194 Update problem: affected_rows=0 > 16-Nov 08:25 director-dir: Allied-ex3.2009-11-16_01.00.02 Warning: Error > getting job record

Re: [Bacula-users] virtuafull and verify

Is no one using verify jobs for virtual fulls? -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Fahrer, Julian [mailto:jul...@fahrer.net] Gesendet: Freitag, 13. November 2009 09:02 An: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: [Bacula-users] virtuafull and verify Hey guys, I am currently trying to impl

Re: [Bacula-users] Maximum volume size

Federico Alberto Sayd wrote: > Hello, I'm new to Bacula and this is my first message. I have a question: > > When I backup to disk, what is the recommended maximum volume size? > Official doc says that with versions up to and including 1.39.28 the > recommended maximun volumen size is 5 GB. I am

[Bacula-users] Strange problems with Bacula which mostly works

Hi, I'm using bacula 2.4.4 to save to file volumes, using gzip compression, with both Windows and GNU/Linux clients. The database backend is PostgreSQL 8.3.8 Backups and restore both seem to work just fine. However, in the "Media" panel in bat, the "Files" column always contain 0, even when I us

[Bacula-users] Limitations displaying large file sizes in bconsole when browsing for a restore?

Are there any odd limitations in the bconsole (both 'restore' and 'estimate listing' sections) browsing with regard to large files, such as VMware disk files? I've just stumbled onto this oddity... # ls -l pituitary-flat.vmdk -rw-r- 1 root root 21474836480 Nov 17 15:27 pituitary-flat.vmdk

[Bacula-users] Maximum volume size

Hello, I'm new to Bacula and this is my first message. I have a question: When I backup to disk, what is the recommended maximum volume size? Official doc says that with versions up to and including 1.39.28 the recommended maximun volumen size is 5 GB. I am using Bacula 2.4.4 on Debian Lenny, t

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrade to 3.0.3 Job is waiting for execution

Giuseppe De Nicolo' wrote: > Alan Brown wrote: >> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Giuseppe De Nicolo' wrote: >> >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Since the upgrade to 3.0.3 our test server have this strange >>> behavior , the first job after bacula start up runs fine all others get >>> in line as "job is waiting e

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrade to 3.0.3 Job is waiting for execution

On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Giuseppe De Nicolo' wrote: > Hi All, > > Since the upgrade to 3.0.3 our test server have this strange > behavior , the first job after bacula start up runs fine all others get > in line as "job is waiting execution" and nothing happens, restarting > bacula reset job lists

[Bacula-users] Upgrade to 3.0.3 Job is waiting for execution

Hi All, Since the upgrade to 3.0.3 our test server have this strange behavior , the first job after bacula start up runs fine all others get in line as "job is waiting execution" and nothing happens, restarting bacula reset job lists and again only the first job run fine. The log show

Re: [Bacula-users] after building bat, location of binary varies

> On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:32:56 -0500, Dan Langille said: > > Martin Simmons wrote: > >> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:45:43 -0500, Dan Langille said: > >> Folks, > >> > >> I am finding that the location of the executable binary varies from one > >> system to another. I am trying to find out why

Re: [Bacula-users] question about multiple file pools

Hello, 17.11.2009 02:48, Jerome Alet wrote: > Hi again, > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 02:09:03AM +0100, Arno Lehmann wrote: >> 17.11.2009 00:49, Jerome Alet wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 02:35:12PM +1100, Jerome Alet wrote: ... But during restore, what happens is that only volumes configu