On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 6:10 PM, ebollengier wrote:
> How are you 100% sure that only Bacula will change this archive bit on your
> system? (It can
> lead to serious consistency problems if users run winzip on your back) How
> will work
> Differential backups? (this bit would have been unset many
Júlio Maranhão-2 wrote:
>
>> In theory, Accurate means that it should back up any file that is in any
>> way different to what it was when the backup was last done. I'm not sure
>> to what extent it works in practice.
>
> I will measure the memory cost and correctness.
>
>>
>> Bacula began in
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Free BSD wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Free BSD wrote:
>>
>>> Dear List Members
>>>
>>> I have Bacula up and running, which is working fine, except for one issue.
>>>
>>>
>> Are all jobs going to the same pool. Remember bacula c
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Free BSD wrote:
> Dear List Members
>
> I have Bacula up and running, which is working fine, except for one issue.
>
> I have set the maximum concurrent job to 13 in all the expected sections
> in bacula-dir.conf (Director, Client, Job and storage). i can see that
Dear List Members
I have Bacula up and running, which is working fine, except for one issue.
I have set the maximum concurrent job to 13 in all the expected sections
in bacula-dir.conf (Director, Client, Job and storage). i can see that
all the jobs are listed as R in the job status, but nothing
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Watson, Joe wrote:
> let me know if you get it working i would like to see how. i have been
> working on mine for sometime trying to get it working. i hope i was of any
> help
>
First... I'm a little embarrassed to say, that I hadn't run lsscsi -g, but
after inst
Hello,
Here is my Pb when I restored (rest -> choice 5), building tree is
15 minutes to build.
How do I know what is the SQL generated?
and / or
What indexes should it position?
I was bacula 2.4.4 but in recent days 3.0.2. The only upgrade_mysql_table
not what to put as indexes.
was the creat
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 09:18:34AM -0300, Júlio Maranhão wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Graham Keeling wrote:
> > After investigating this for myself last week, I found that the code looks
> > at the access and modification times of files in both the 'accurate' and
> > non-'accurate' ca
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Graham Keeling wrote:
> After investigating this for myself last week, I found that the code looks
> at the access and modification times of files in both the 'accurate' and
> non-'accurate' cases.
> So, for example, if you change a file and then set those times ba
Hi,
(I have already sent this message. Sorry if you already received)
I use bacula 2.4.4 in debian lenny and etch with FileStorages of 2 servers :
- localhost named bacula-srv (lenny)
- remote named bombarde (etch with backports)
The bacula-director is installed of bacula-srv.
The true server st
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 08:12:54PM +1000, James Harper wrote:
> > Considering "file names" loaded in RAM, I still have doubts. For instance:
> >
> > 1) If Accurate=yes, and there is a new file but with old date than
> > previous full/diff/inc backup, will it be backed up? Is this very old
> > Wind
11 matches
Mail list logo
