[Bacula-users] gpg keys for el5 rpms

2009-09-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
The sigs for the gpg key on the sourceforge download don't match the sigs on the el5 rpms, anyone know where to get the proper key? Thanks! jlc -- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Da

Re: [Bacula-users] libmysqlclient_r.so.12

2009-09-06 Thread king
Yes you are correct i have a couple of versions installed one was from source and is version 2.4.4 this is from when i was running dapper. Now that i have upgraded to Hardy which broke parts of my install I have reinstalled bacula from the repositories which is at version 2.2.8. A bit of a mes

Re: [Bacula-users] Particular schedule

2009-09-06 Thread Cedric Tefft
Fabrizio Reale wrote: > Hi all, > what is the best configuration to keep only the backup of: > * the last 7 days > * the last 4 sundays > * the last 6 31st days of the month > * the last 31st of December > ? > > Thank you for your help and your software. > > Fabrizio > You probably want sepa

Re: [Bacula-users] incorrect autolabel behaviour

2009-09-06 Thread ZMike
Oleg Gawriloff wrote: > We have test setup with 2 clients. Each of them must be backed up to > separate volume (disk file). For this we using following config > (attached). The problem is: when backup schedule time arrived and 2nd > client have problems (for example turned-off) director _first_

Re: [Bacula-users] Compatibility of Bacula 3.0.2

2009-09-06 Thread Ralf Gross
Daniel Bareiro schrieb: > > When updating an installation of Debian GNU/Linux testing I see that > with this was updated the installed version of bacula-fd, being > now installed 3.0.2-3+b1, of Debian testing repositories. > > The problem with this is I am observing that, for some reason, the > B

Re: [Bacula-users] Compatibility of Bacula 3.0.2

2009-09-06 Thread John Drescher
> When updating an installation of Debian GNU/Linux testing I see that > with this was updated the installed version of bacula-fd, being > now installed 3.0.2-3+b1, of Debian testing repositories. > > The problem with this is I am observing that, for some reason, the > Bacula server cannot communic

[Bacula-users] Compatibility of Bacula 3.0.2

2009-09-06 Thread Daniel Bareiro
Hi all! When updating an installation of Debian GNU/Linux testing I see that with this was updated the installed version of bacula-fd, being now installed 3.0.2-3+b1, of Debian testing repositories. The problem with this is I am observing that, for some reason, the Bacula server cannot communicat

Re: [Bacula-users] Show disabled jobs

2009-09-06 Thread Daniel Bareiro
On Saturday, 05 September 2009 06:47:38 +0200, Ulrich Leodolter wrote: > Hi, Hi Ulrich. > > I've a productive server with Debian GNU/Linux Etch for Sparc which > > has installed Bacula 1.38.11. Is there in this version some way to > > obtain a listing of disabled jobs? > i don't think so > but

[Bacula-users] incorrect autolabel behaviour

2009-09-06 Thread Oleg Gawriloff
We have test setup with 2 clients. Each of them must be backed up to separate volume (disk file). For this we using following config (attached). The problem is: when backup schedule time arrived and 2nd client have problems (for example turned-off) director _first_ creates new volume for this c