On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> I've set-up a migration job to migrate jobs from one set of tape volumes to
> disk volumes. I've configured the destination pool to use the volume once
> and have a retention period of 2 months. For some reason when the migration
> job compl
Some additional info: btape also does not know what to do with the next
tape:
Wrote blk_block=159, dev_blk_num=2930 VolBytes=416,808,697,856
rate=60990.4 KB/s
Wrote blk_block=1595000, dev_blk_num=302 VolBytes=418,119,417,856
rate=61003.7 KB/s
Wrote blk_block=160, dev_blk_num=1488 VolByt
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:53:26 -0700, mehma sarja said:
>
> Thanks Martin,
>
> You have put a good closure on the quest for knowledge. If I upgrade Bacula,
> will I have to upgrade the database? Meaning do I have to run those update
> table scripts. I am on postgresql version 8.29.
Sorry, I
Thanks Martin,
You have put a good closure on the quest for knowledge. If I upgrade Bacula,
will I have to upgrade the database? Meaning do I have to run those update
table scripts. I am on postgresql version 8.29.
Yudhvir
OK, this shows why it is slow. The algorithm in add_findex is only
> eff
Hello all,
to get to know more users of Bacula and allow us to actually meet fact
to face, everybody using Bacula or interested in it is invited:
Tomorrow, June 27th
Starting 20:00
Location: Bar / Restaurant AndaLuca, Savignyplatz 2, Berlin
Bacula Systems sponsoring drinks (some limitation ;-)
Greetings,
I have been banging my head against the wall for a few days now. I am
hoping someone can point me in the right direction.
For about 3 or 4 days now, Bacula refuses to mount tapes and use them.
If I start a job manually, the tape will mount, and the backup will not
start. The intere
Andreas,
This really depends on your configuration. If you have only one drive
head, you should set
"Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 6" (or any number your want)
in your job definitions. If you have multiple drive i/o heads, you have
to also configure your job definition to prefer mounted volumes to
Silver Salonen wrote:
> Um.. we have different basics of our discussion - you use tapes, I use disks,
> so I expect Bacula to handle volumes and pools differently than in your case.
Irelevant, really. If you are running a backup system, you essentially
handle them the same way; as rotated recep
I had two backups scheduled for the same time and it
appears that they both felt they wanted the same tape.
I have concurrency on, yet one job is running, writing
to tape #100058 in drive #1, yet the second job is
asking for tape #100058 in drive #0.
Any ideas?
-John
--
"Notebook. No photograph
On Friday 26 June 2009 14:26:49 John Drescher wrote:
> >> I do this every single day at home. 5 jobs concurrently write to the
> >> same exact volume.
> >
> > My original claim was made in the context of disk-based backups (ie.
multiple
> > pools as I explained in the same message). Using the same
On Friday 26 June 2009 10:07:46 terryc wrote:
> Silver Salonen wrote:
> > On Friday 26 June 2009 02:07:58 terryc wrote:
> >> Silver Salonen wrote:
> >>> Eg. if we want to do ordinary Grandfather-Father-Son rotation, we
> >>> create 3 different pools for every job - for full, differential and
> >
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 4:23 AM, Jose E. Molina wrote:
> There's been an interesting thread about the limitations of the
> storage/device model in Bacula, and i think i'm hitting one of those
> limitations, or maybe a configuration error:
>
> I have 1 Storage daemon with 1 File device, 1 autochange
There's been an interesting thread about the limitations of the
storage/device model in Bacula, and i think i'm hitting one of those
limitations, or maybe a configuration error:
I have 1 Storage daemon with 1 File device, 1 autochanger with 1 Tape
device.
I want to make concurrent backups to t
Op 06/26/09 14:45, James Harper schreef:
>>> How urgent is it to get this fixed?
>>>
>>> As far as I can tell you are doing everything right... I'll look up
>>> those error messages.
>>>
>>> James
>> I disabled the ntbackup schedule to make sure I got a 'clean' full
>> backup and the result is the
Op 06/26/09 03:17, James Harper schreef:
>> Another update: I found out that the database is in fact in a "Dirty
>> Shutdown" state (eseutil.exe told me that) - hence it won't work
> (mount).
>> I found a discussion about this here:
>>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.ne
> >
> > How urgent is it to get this fixed?
> >
> > As far as I can tell you are doing everything right... I'll look up
> > those error messages.
> >
> > James
> I disabled the ntbackup schedule to make sure I got a 'clean' full
> backup and the result is the same. I have no log files because of th
>> I do this every single day at home. 5 jobs concurrently write to the
>> same exact volume.
>
> My original claim was made in the context of disk-based backups (ie. multiple
> pools as I explained in the same message). Using the same exact volume (or
> pool) with disk-based backup-system is quite
Frank Altpeter wrote on 26.06.2009 11:20:06:
> Frank Altpeter
> 26.06.2009 11:20
>
> An
>
> c.kesch...@internet-mit-iq.de
>
> Kopie
>
> Thema
>
> Re: [Bacula-users] How to prevent two clients to run at the same time
>
> Hi again,
>
> 2009/6/22 Frank Altpeter :
> > 2009/6/22 :
> >> You c
Hi again,
2009/6/22 Frank Altpeter :
> 2009/6/22 :
>> You could just give one server a lower priority. It would then run after all
>> other Jobs. The default is 10 (11 for the catalog), so Priority = 12 in the
>> Job Resource will make it run later.
>
> Hmm, this sounds indeed like a good idea. I
i remember that i have problems with mt and mtx after upgrading to lenny,
something causes problems with their output and the mtx-changer script.
e.g. "update slots" needs to run twice in most cases
now i'm using self compiled version of mt and mtx
and everything works just like expected.
terryc
On Friday 26 June 2009 09:38:37 Tom Sommer wrote:
> Tom Sommer wrote:
> > Okay, I added 12GB more RAM. Made my mysql tmp directory a tmpfs. Stole
> > some settings from Jason's my.cnf. Upgraded to latest MySQL version.
>
> This seem to have done the trick. My FULL backup only took 7 hours
> today,
Hi, my first post!
I have a Dell Powervault 124T and I believe a Certance Tape drive (LTO-2), the
Server is running Gentoo with Kernel 2.6.29-gentoo-r5 and Bacula 2.4.1-r1.
Below is the latter part of a btape fill single tape, which ends in a MTWEOF
error, I assume this is something I need to
Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Thursday 25 June 2009 19:41:10 John Drescher wrote:
There is no such limit. If you want more than one pool to write
concurrently have more than 1 storage device. With disks you can have
as many as you want. They can all point to the same physical storage
>>
Tom Sommer wrote:
> Okay, I added 12GB more RAM. Made my mysql tmp directory a tmpfs. Stole
> some settings from Jason's my.cnf. Upgraded to latest MySQL version.
>
This seem to have done the trick. My FULL backup only took 7 hours
today, and completed without problems.
Sadly my director daemon
> I'm not sure how the Exchange plugin works here. Since you are talking
> about backing up/restoring the database *file*, the Exchange plugin
may
> not even figure in the picture, doesn't that provide a mailbox-level
backup?
>
> Assuming that the Exchange plugin is not part of the picture, what y
>
> Update: I think I found a restore setup that actually restores the
> backup. The backup gets cut short when the DB is activated in Exchange
> and this also crashes the Bacula FD on the target machine.
>
> The end is "Error: HrESERestoreComplete failed
> with error 0xc7ff1004 - Unknown error."
Silver Salonen wrote:
> On Friday 26 June 2009 02:07:58 terryc wrote:
>> Silver Salonen wrote:
>>> Eg. if we want to do ordinary Grandfather-Father-Son rotation, we
>>> create 3 different pools for every job - for full, differential and
>>> incremental backups.
>> That is not how I understand GF
27 matches
Mail list logo
