On Tuesday 02 June 2009 22:15:47 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:54:24 +0300, Silver Salonen said:
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > Currently I see this behavior in Bacula 3.0.0 (on FreeBSD):
> >
> > I backup a directory (having 6 files), then remove the original directory
and
> > re
This is an edited version of a previous post
Before posting to this forum, you need to understand that it is also connected
to a mailing list that existed before the forum, and that we must respect that
community's wishes. EVERY forum post that you make is immediately sent to that
ma
Before posting to this forum, you need to understand that it is also connected
to a mailing list that existed before the forum, and that we must respect that
community's wishes. EVERY forum post that you make is immediately sent to that
mailing list as an email. Messages that include no conte
Hello,
02.06.2009 23:17, Walton, Bryan K wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have an XFS filesystem that we are running out of inodes on.
> Therefore, we need to mount this filesystem with the inode64 mount
> option (this is a 64-bit Linux server running 64-bit Debian). According
> to the man page for "mount",
Hi,
We have an XFS filesystem that we are running out of inodes on.
Therefore, we need to mount this filesystem with the inode64 mount
option (this is a 64-bit Linux server running 64-bit Debian). According
to the man page for "mount", it says:
--- SNIP ---
inode64
Indicates that
Hi!
I have some problem with upgrade Bacula from version 1.38.11 to 3.0.1. I did
steps below:
1. I ran a few backups (Full, Incremental, Differential) by Bacula 1.38.11.
They were ok.
2. I compiled Bacula 3.0.1 as the same options as Bacula 1.38.11.
3. I upgraded Bacula.
4. I ran databas
Greetings,
I've been seeing an issue whereby a volume gets marked in error
periodically. The last items logged about that volume are typically like this:
02-Jun 11:53 gyrus-sd JobId 83311: Volume "LTO224L2" previously written,
moving to end of data.
02-Jun 11:53 gyrus-sd JobId 83311: Error: B
> On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:54:24 +0300, Silver Salonen said:
>
> Hello.
>
> Currently I see this behavior in Bacula 3.0.0 (on FreeBSD):
>
> I backup a directory (having 6 files), then remove the original directory and
> restore it from backup. When I run an incremental backup of the same
> di
I am always for using the right tool for the job. For me, this is
ESXpress http://www.phdvirtual.com .
brian-
Hydro Meteor wrote:
> Hello all --
>
> As the world continues to ramp up into the use of virtual machine
> systems more and more, its becoming quite an interesting world to live
> in
I run a Bacula Job and I get this message and I don't know what is mean:
02-Jun 11:01 salvasprod-fd JobId 15: Fatal error:
/home/kern/bacula/k/src/filed/job.c:1886 Bad response to Append Data command.
Wanted 3000 OK data
, got 3903 Error append data
02-Jun 11:01 FileSAN JobId 15: Job
Copia-Sal
It's possible to Autolabel a volume? Every time I run a job it start fine but
then it wait for a label command and I don't want that. This is my
configuration for Pool directive:
Pool {
Name = Copia-SalvasProd-Pool
Pool Type = Backup
Recycle = yes
AutoPrune = yes
Volume Retention = 1 y
Reynier Perez Mira wrote:
> Hi again:
> I have this config for one of my clients:
>
> #Description: Backup the files include in FS for salvasprod-fd
> #-
> #Job Definition
> Job {
> Name = "Copia-SalvasProdFull-FD"
> JobDefs = "Def
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Reynier Perez Mira wrote:
> Hi every:
> I have one server connected to a SAN in which I get installed and configured
> Bacula. Here is the Director and all others components except Catalog which
> run in another PostgreSQL DB Server. Now I have another Server (Win
Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
> I agree, this would be a nice feature, not only for virtual machine
> images.
>
> But if you install bacula inside a virtual machine you can restore
> individual files. If you backup images you can only restore full
> images.
>
> Ulrich
>
>
I agree, but I have been
Hi again:
I have this config for one of my clients:
#Description: Backup the files include in FS for salvasprod-fd
#-
#Job Definition
Job {
Name = "Copia-SalvasProdFull-FD"
JobDefs = "DefinicionPorDefectoParaCopias"
Level = Full
Hi every:
I have one server connected to a SAN in which I get installed and configured
Bacula. Here is the Director and all others components except Catalog which run
in another PostgreSQL DB Server. Now I have another Server (Win 2003 R2 for
now) connected to a PowerVault 122T Tape Drive. I wan
Dear All bacula users,
Here is some more information about my problem. After reading this :
http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg10009.html
I try compiling it with the -O0 the source.. and I still get the same error.
Here are more information from btraceback :
[Thr
Hi,
Excellent! The sqlquery command followed by the PRAGMA "query" did the
trick. I was now able to create full backups of my systems again.
Martin en Arno thank you both very much for you help!
Regards,
J.
Arno Lehmann writes:
> Hello,
>
> 02.06.2009 07:59, Johan van Vliet wrote:
>> Hi al
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Victor Sterpu wrote:
> I did restarted the bacula services, but still, the reported version is 2.4.4.
> I also installed the latest tar.gz 3.0.1 on another clean machine and the
> reported version is still 2.4.4.
try "which bacula-dir", "which bacula-sd", "which bacula-fd"
It
Christian Gaul wrote:
Victor Sterpu schrieb:
Christian Gaul wrote:
Thomas Mueller schrieb:
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:31:30 +0300, Victor Sterpu wrote:
I've just installed bacula 3.0.1 and I have the following error "File
daemon at ":9102" rejected Hello comman
Victor Sterpu schrieb:
> Christian Gaul wrote:
>> Thomas Mueller schrieb:
>>
>>> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:31:30 +0300, Victor Sterpu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
I've just installed bacula 3.0.1 and I have the following error "File
daemon at ":9102" rejected Hello command".
Thank
Christian Gaul wrote:
Thomas Mueller schrieb:
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:31:30 +0300, Victor Sterpu wrote:
I've just installed bacula 3.0.1 and I have the following error "File
daemon at ":9102" rejected Hello command".
Thank you.
(maybe) your file daemon is not version 3.x
Hello,
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 21:53 -1000, Hydro Meteor wrote:
> Hello all --
>
> As the world continues to ramp up into the use of virtual machine
> systems more and more, its becoming quite an interesting world to live
> in with regard to storage systems and backups of these virtual machine
> fi
Thomas Mueller schrieb:
> On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:31:30 +0300, Victor Sterpu wrote:
>
>
>> I've just installed bacula 3.0.1 and I have the following error "File
>> daemon at ":9102" rejected Hello command".
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>
> (maybe) your file daemon is not version 3.x . this command IM
On Mon, 01 Jun 2009 15:31:30 +0300, Victor Sterpu wrote:
> I've just installed bacula 3.0.1 and I have the following error "File
> daemon at ":9102" rejected Hello command".
>
> Thank you.
(maybe) your file daemon is not version 3.x . this command IMHO was
introduced with 3.0.
- thomas
-
Hi:
My 2 cents about backing up block level. I think that could be interesting
for Bacula in a medium future to take a look at the file system btrfs (
actually developed by Oracle ). Among other features, it mantains a bitmap
of OS blocks changed in the file system, afaik, querying this bitmap all
Actually, when it comes to VMWare, you DON'T want to do a backup of the
image files. And you also DON'T want to do a backup of the files in the
virtual machine. And you also DON'T want to do a block-level backup.
I recently attended a presentation on virtualization, and the presenter
made a ver
during the last weekend we had some problem with one of our windows-server,
backup-job was started but never sent any data. when trying to cancel this
hanging
job, it never vanished from the job list and blocked all other jobs.
also a restart of file-daemon on my windows-server didn't help to get
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 12:13:37AM -0300, junior carvalho wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> I have some debian etch servers working with bacula 1.38; I would like to
> migrate to 2.4 ( from backports ), there are some kind of incompatibilites?
> problems? there are a special way to follow?
>
> JC
Hello JC,
Hello.
Currently I see this behavior in Bacula 3.0.0 (on FreeBSD):
I backup a directory (having 6 files), then remove the original directory and
restore it from backup. When I run an incremental backup of the same directory
then, all the files are getting backed up again, although they should b
Hello all --
As the world continues to ramp up into the use of virtual machine systems
more and more, its becoming quite an interesting world to live in with
regard to storage systems and backups of these virtual machine files. The
main virtual machine systems such as those by VMWare (I.e., VMWare
Hello,
02.06.2009 07:59, Johan van Vliet wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With help from this list I discovered that a temporary SQLite3 file is
> filling up my root file system. For incrementals and differentials this is
> not a problem. Full backups, however, fail because the / (root) fills to
> 100%.
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
