Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula project voting

2009-05-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, On Wednesday 06 May 2009 02:09:47 Carsten Menke wrote: > Hi all, > > while at the spot, I remarked that my feature request from > about maybe 2 years ago which are to be found in the > kernstodo file > > http://bacula.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bacula/trunk/bacula/kernstodo?revi >sion=8661&

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula project voting

2009-05-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
Thanks for looking at the projects list and reporting this problem. I will correct the duplicate #23, #31 problem. Also for the moment #28 appears on two different projects :-( This will all be fixed before the vote -- thanks. Kern On Wednesday 06 May 2009 07:55:04 Alex Ehrlich wrote: > Hell

Re: [Bacula-users] Is that ok using Bacula to write on DVDs?

2009-05-05 Thread Bruno Friedmann
alexan...@nautae.eti.br wrote: >> I can only subscribe to John comment & recommandation. >> You certainly would have a better experience with pool on disk even on >> removable usb disk >> There's not so expensive this days. > > Ok, I gave up of doing DVD writing by Bacula. > > I'll use disk volum

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Bacula project voting

2009-05-05 Thread Alex Ehrlich
Hello, Item #31 "Backup and Restore of Windows Encrypted Files using Win raw encryption" is a duplicate of #23 "Add EFS support on Windows". Alex Ehrlich Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello, > > As many of you know, once we release a major version, we start implementing > features for the next version

Re: [Bacula-users] Btape fill test fatal error WEOF

2009-05-05 Thread Hayden Katzenellenbogen
John, I changed the mtx-changer.conf file to reflect timeouts. I tried using and offline sleep and a load sleep both of these produced the same error. I also install mt-st to see if that made any difference. I ran btape with debugging set to 200 to see if that output gave any extra information.

[Bacula-users] Bacula project voting

2009-05-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, As many of you know, once we release a major version, we start implementing features for the next version. To allow the Bacula user community to have input to the development process, we accumulate Feature Requests, then the community votes on which features they would like to see. Her

Re: [Bacula-users] Is that ok using Bacula to write on DVDs?

2009-05-05 Thread alexander
> I can only subscribe to John comment & recommandation. > You certainly would have a better experience with pool on disk even > on removable usb disk > There's not so expensive this days. Ok, I gave up of doing DVD writing by Bacula. I'll use disk volumes and burn the DVD after that. I'm not

Re: [Bacula-users] Is that ok using Bacula to write on DVDs?

2009-05-05 Thread Bruno Friedmann
alexan...@nautae.eti.br wrote: > Hi guys, > > First of all, excuse my English. > > I'm newbie with Bacula and I don't have any condition to backup my > data using tapes. > > I must use DVDs... > > Is that ok using Bacula to write on DVDs? > > What you suggest? > > []'s > Alexander > Brazil

Re: [Bacula-users] ACL and restore

2009-05-05 Thread Bruno Friedmann
There's always acl on xfs. It's just standard on it. So even if bacula try to only restore acl on existing source you would have such errors. Be carefull on using window's profile on ext3 without acl and xattrs. One days or another you will be hit by permissions trouble. Maxime wrote: > Hi li

Re: [Bacula-users] Is that ok using Bacula to write on DVDs?

2009-05-05 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:35 PM, wrote: >> This does not work 100% of the time out of the box. I would suggest >> writing 4.5GB disk volumes then using your favorite dvd burning >> software to offload the disk images to dvd. >> John >>> >>> First of all, excuse my English. > > So... let me try to

Re: [Bacula-users] Is that ok using Bacula to write on DVDs?

2009-05-05 Thread alexander
> This does not work 100% of the time out of the box. I would suggest > writing 4.5GB disk volumes then using your favorite dvd burning > software to offload the disk images to dvd. > John >> First of all, excuse my English. So... let me try to understand: If I write 4.5GB disk volumes (in a incr

Re: [Bacula-users] Is that ok using Bacula to write on DVDs?

2009-05-05 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:35 AM, wrote: > Hi guys, > > First of all, excuse my English. > > I'm newbie with Bacula and I don't have any condition to backup my > data using tapes. > > I must use DVDs... > > Is that ok using Bacula to write on DVDs? > > What you suggest? > This does not work 100%

[Bacula-users] Is that ok using Bacula to write on DVDs?

2009-05-05 Thread alexander
Hi guys, First of all, excuse my English. I'm newbie with Bacula and I don't have any condition to backup my data using tapes. I must use DVDs... Is that ok using Bacula to write on DVDs? What you suggest? []'s Alexander Brazil - Rio de Janeiro -

[Bacula-users] ACL and restore

2009-05-05 Thread Maxime
Hi list, I have noticed something concerning ACLs. I run bacula-2.4.3 compiled with ACL support both on fd and director (Debian sarge and etch). I have restored some files from XFS filesystem to ext3 filesystem. Ext3 partition doesn't have ACL mount option. Original files do not have any ACL se

[Bacula-users] job date detection

2009-05-05 Thread Olaf Zevenboom
Hi list, I use a script in a RunBeforeJob script to check the date so I can check if it's a holiday or not and thus if a backup should run or not. The backup consists of 3 jobs: backup, verify, backup catalog & unmount & rewind & eject & mount All jobs are scheduled 5 minutes after each other an

Re: [Bacula-users] duplicate jobs in 3.0

2009-05-05 Thread Jonas Björklund
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Silver Salonen wrote: > In Bacula 2.x I used to use my own script that I ran in dir before every job. > The script would query dir whether the job is already ran (the job may be > still waiting for smth or running) and if this is the case, the script would > return 1 and can

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape MTEOM error with Dell TL2000 (IBM > TS3100)

2009-05-05 Thread Win Htin
Did you erase the tapes before re-running the backups? I would recommend first to completely erase the tape(s), run "btape" to make sure everything is working fine and then start testing the actual backups. Capture the output while running "btape" and go through it line by line to make sure you do

Re: [Bacula-users] Two EOF

2009-05-05 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Sat, 02 May 2009 01:24:57 +0200, SZÉKELYI Szabolcs said: > > Martin Simmons wrote: > >> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:45:17 +0200, SZÉKELYI Szabolcs said: > >> Hi, > >> > >> We configured our tape storage with > >> > >> Two EOF = Yes > >> BSF at EOM = Yes > >> > >> and found that this works

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula can unmount a tape but can't mount another tape

2009-05-05 Thread C.DriK
I forgot to clarify that my bacula-sd.conf, I just add: Autoselect = yes But I have not yet tested > Message du 05/05/09 12:48 > De : "C.DriK" > A : bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Copie à : > Objet : [Bacula-users] bacula can unmount a tape but can't mount another tape > > Hello, > >

[Bacula-users] bacula can unmount a tape but can't mount another tape

2009-05-05 Thread C.DriK
Hello, I have a tape drive DELL PowerVault TL2000, it works very well with Bacula. Only one thing does not work, the Autochanger. Here is a little more detail: I have 2 pools, 1 pool windows and 1 pool linux. For each pool I have a LTO-3 tape. Imagine that in the Drive-0 is the tape of linux-pool

Re: [Bacula-users] Strange error with Files on Volume / in Catalog after upgrade from 2.4.4 to 3.0.0

2009-05-05 Thread Christian Gaul
John Drescher schrieb: > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Christian Gaul > wrote: > >> Christian Gaul wrote: >> >>> Hello List, >>> >>> >>> Next i will be trying the btape testsuite again, seeing if something >>> changed which i didnt see in the changelog that will force me to use >>> som

Re: [Bacula-users] duplicate jobs in 3.0

2009-05-05 Thread Silver Salonen
Well, I've got "Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 3", so it looks like the duplicate job control does quite the same as "Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 1", which is weird enough :) PS. I haven't tried or tested this more, so maybe we're missing smth. -- Silver On Monday 04 May 2009 20:44:22 Stephen Thomps