On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 4:34 AM, Karel wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Recently I recieved the following notification:
>
> 09-Apr 23:00 sterialux1-sd: Please mount Volume "000103" or label a
> new one for:
> Job:
> Mavensib2.2009-04-09_22.00.00
> Storage: "Drive0" (Tape0)
> Pool
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 4:35 AM, thecount
wrote:
>
> hi
> i'm a bacula n00b but i've just managed to get the thing up and running
> (woo-hoo!)
> my slight worry though is that the server and client are running on the same
> machine. the backup files are stored on an external hard drive but bacul
Hi all,
Recently I recieved the following notification:
09-Apr 23:00 sterialux1-sd: Please mount Volume "000103" or label a new
one for:
Job:
Mavensib2.2009-04-09_22.00.00
Storage: "Drive0" (Tape0)
Pool: Default
Media type: HPDAT72x6
I have a tape driv
hi
i'm a bacula n00b but i've just managed to get the thing up and running
(woo-hoo!)
my slight worry though is that the server and client are running on the same
machine. the backup files are stored on an external hard drive but bacula.sql
and bacula.db are both on the same disk as the files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>> Andreas Schuldei wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:48 PM, John Drescher
>>> wrote:
I would just enable concurrency. Use a small spool file (less than 10
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 6:02 PM, James Chamberlain wrote:
>>> Why would you ever want such a pool? The only reason I can think of is
>>> if
>>> you have more pools than backup devices;
>>
>> Exactly what you said. I have 20 pools and 2 backup devices with my 2
>> drive 24 slot autochanger.
>
> Wh
>> Why would you ever want such a pool? The only reason I can think
>> of is if
>> you have more pools than backup devices;
>
> Exactly what you said. I have 20 pools and 2 backup devices with my 2
> drive 24 slot autochanger.
Why so many pools? Are you doing one per client?
>> but that's the
> Why would you ever want such a pool? The only reason I can think of is if
> you have more pools than backup devices;
Exactly what you said. I have 20 pools and 2 backup devices with my 2
drive 24 slot autochanger.
> but that's the opposite of the
> problem I'm trying to solve. I have more bac
>> You do not understand idea of scratch pool. this pool is literally
>> speaking
>> some kind of trash for volumes that were recycled. you cannot use
>> volumes in
>> scratch pool. they are grabbed from it and placed to the pool which
>> needs new
>> media so adding new storage for scratch p
2009/4/13 Jeff Dickens :
> >From the 2.4.0 release notes:
> (http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=604636&group_id=50727)
>
> This Director and Storage daemon must be upgraded at the same time,
> but they should be compatible with all 2.0.x File daemons, unless you
> use some of t
> You do not understand idea of scratch pool. this pool is literally speaking
> some kind of trash for volumes that were recycled. you cannot use volumes in
> scratch pool. they are grabbed from it and placed to the pool which needs new
> media so adding new storage for scratch pool is senseless fo
> You do not understand idea of scratch pool. this pool is literally speaking
> some kind of trash for volumes that were recycled. you cannot use volumes in
> scratch pool. they are grabbed from it and placed to the pool which needs new
> media so adding new storage for scratch pool is senseless fo
From the 2.4.0 release notes:
(http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=604636&group_id=50727)
This Director and Storage daemon must be upgraded at the same time,
but they should be compatible with all 2.0.x File daemons, unless you
use some of the new features that affect
You do not understand idea of scratch pool. this pool is literally speaking
some kind of trash for volumes that were recycled. you cannot use volumes in
scratch pool. they are grabbed from it and placed to the pool which needs new
media so adding new storage for scratch pool is senseless for me.
> I'm having trouble with scratch pools. I have a three main backup
> pools configured in Bacula (Desktops, Infrastructure, Servers). Each
> corresponds to a separate RAID device (disk0, disk1, disk2), for disk-
> to-disk backups. I have added a fourth RAID device (disk3) which I
> want to act a
Hi Bacula Users,
I'm having trouble with scratch pools. I have a three main backup
pools configured in Bacula (Desktops, Infrastructure, Servers). Each
corresponds to a separate RAID device (disk0, disk1, disk2), for disk-
to-disk backups. I have added a fourth RAID device (disk3) which I
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Kevin Keane wrote:
[...]
> Notes: This feature may only makes sense for jobs and files, maybe not for
> volumes.
> I haven't fully thought through the implications yet.
> The interaction between "Keep Copies" and "Volume Retention"
> nee
On Monday 13 April 2009 16:28:57 John Drescher wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Silver Salonen wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I upgraded my Bacula on FreeBSD from 2.4.x to 3.0, but running bacula-dir
-t
> > gives an error:
> > =
> > 13-Apr 09:53 bacula-dir: ERROR TERMINATION at inc_conf.c
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Silver Salonen wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I upgraded my Bacula on FreeBSD from 2.4.x to 3.0, but running bacula-dir -t
> gives an error:
> =
> 13-Apr 09:53 bacula-dir: ERROR TERMINATION at inc_conf.c:712
> Config error: Options section not permitted in Exclude
>
>
I've had a chance to do some rough testing to see how expanding the
`lstat' field might affect insert times.
I've gathered insert times for original `file' table with base64-ish
encoded lstat, and new table with expanded lstat. Tests for all
databases were done from the same SQL file, which contai
Hello.
I upgraded my Bacula on FreeBSD from 2.4.x to 3.0, but running bacula-dir -t
gives an error:
=
13-Apr 09:53 bacula-dir: ERROR TERMINATION at inc_conf.c:712
Config error: Options section not permitted in Exclude
: line 12, col 10 of file /usr/local/etc/bacula/fileset-var.co
21 matches
Mail list logo
