On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:01 PM, Victor Hugo dos Santos
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have this network topology:
> - ~ 40 servers/clients
> - 1 director
> - 2 storages
> - all servers connect in Gigabits switches and GB network cards too. :-)
> - all baculas (director and sotrages) and all linux servers
Victor Hugo dos Santos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have this network topology:
> - ~ 40 servers/clients
> - 1 director
> - 2 storages
> - all servers connect in Gigabits switches and GB network cards too. :-)
> - all baculas (director and sotrages) and all linux servers connect
> with 2 network card in
Hello,
I have this network topology:
- ~ 40 servers/clients
- 1 director
- 2 storages
- all servers connect in Gigabits switches and GB network cards too. :-)
- all baculas (director and sotrages) and all linux servers connect
with 2 network card in bonding mode 6
well.. my problem is that jobs,
I'm running 2.4.2 on Ubuntu. So your save/delete job buttons DO come up when
the daemons are up?
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:27 AM, K. Lelong wrote:
> Chris Cameron schreef:
> > Thanks Koenraad,
> > For me it doesn't matter how many times I try to reload the edit page of
> > a job, the save/delet
Brian Debelius wrote:
> I have mtx-changer modified for the wait_for_drive to time out after 25
> minutes. And, yes sometimes it does take a long time to load a tape.
> I'll have to ping Mark Nienberg and see if hes discovered anything since
> he last reported it. Although in his case, a seco
Chris Cameron schreef:
> Thanks Koenraad,
> For me it doesn't matter how many times I try to reload the edit page of
> a job, the save/delete buttons do not show (while the daemons are up).
> Daemons down, buttons show up. I don't get it.
> ---
I have mtx-changer modified for the wait_for_drive to time out after 25
minutes. And, yes sometimes it does take a long time to load a tape.
I'll have to ping Mark Nienberg and see if hes discovered anything since
he last reported it. Although in his case, a second mount was successful.
John
btape output:
--
*qfill
btape: btape.c:2431 Test writing blocks of 64512 bytes to tape.
How many blocks do you want to write? (1000): 64000
btape: btape.c:475 Rewound "Drive-0" (/dev/nst0)
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Brian Debelius
wrote:
> Yes, it was recycled.
>
> 10-Mar 00:01 elkton-dir JobId 3912: Start Backup JobId 3912,
> Job=Westminster.2009-03-10_00.01.00.20
> 10-Mar 00:01 elkton-dir JobId 3912: There are no more Jobs associated with
> Volume "B005". Marking it
> 1
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Brian Debelius
wrote:
> I lost another label today. I am relabeling it, and moving on.
>
> btape says:
>
> btape: ../../stored/btape.c:372 open device "VXA-172" (Tape0): OK
> *rewind
> btape: ../../stored/btape.c:475 Rewound "VXA-172" (Tape0)
> *readlabel
> btape
Yes, it was recycled.
10-Mar 00:01 elkton-dir JobId 3912: Start Backup JobId 3912,
Job=Westminster.2009-03-10_00.01.00.20
10-Mar 00:01 elkton-dir JobId 3912: There are no more Jobs associated
with Volume "B005". Marking it
10-Mar 00:01 elkton-dir JobId 3912: All records pruned from Volume
"
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Chris Cameron wrote:
> Also when I go to "run backup job" in webmin all I see is an empty table
> with the heading of "Backup job details". So I can't manually run a job from
> webmin :(
> ---
> Chris Cameron
>
I lost another label today. I am relabeling it, and moving on.
btape says:
btape: ../../stored/btape.c:372 open device "VXA-172" (Tape0): OK
*rewind
btape: ../../stored/btape.c:475 Rewound "VXA-172" (Tape0)
*readlabel
btape: ../../stored/btape.c:422 Volume has no label.
Volume Label:
Id
Also when I go to "run backup job" in webmin all I see is an empty table
with the heading of "*Backup job details*". So I can't manually run a job
from webmin :(
---
Chris Cameron
Sent from: Houston TX United States.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:57
Thanks Koenraad,
For me it doesn't matter how many times I try to reload the edit page of a
job, the save/delete buttons do not show (while the daemons are up). Daemons
down, buttons show up. I don't get it.
---
Chris Cameron
On Wed, Mar 11, 20
Alex Bremer schrieb:
> 2009/3/10, Ralf Gross :
> > Hm, no idea what the problem is. But file 7 is not a real backed up
> > file, it's some kind of mark that bacula writes to the volume.
> >
> > Can you check the volume with bscan?
>
> Yes, seems to work - I tried the '-r' option and bscan did not
2009/3/10, Ralf Gross :
> Hm, no idea what the problem is. But file 7 is not a real backed up
> file, it's some kind of mark that bacula writes to the volume.
>
> Can you check the volume with bscan?
Yes, seems to work - I tried the '-r' option and bscan did not complain:
#
bs
Chris Cameron schreef:
> All,
> When Bacula's 3 services are 'started' in Webmin ("*Process statuses:*
> Bacula Director daemon - *Up* | Storage daemon - *Up* | File daemon
> - *Up*") and I attempt to edit any Backup Job, neither the Save nor the
> Delete buttons show up on that job's edit_j
Hi,
on one W2K3 machine (same settings as a bunch of others without problems),
I started getting some strange errors. The job report says Backup OK with
warnings (which is expected), the Windows console tray reports 'Error' for
all jobs, even after restart of the bacula-fd service and a reru
Jose E. Molina schrieb:
> I have a bit of a poltergeist here. I have configured 12 hour max volume
> use duration:
[...]
> Last weekend the backups failed because all volumes were used, and in
> the log i found this:
>
> 2009-02-21 22:00:02 JobId 1645: Max configured use duration exceeded.
> Ma
hi,
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 12:41 +0100, Stefan Sorin Nicolin wrote:
> On 09.03.2009, at 11:20, Gerald Leier wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> Hi,
>
> >
> > Is there some kind of archive containing valid
> > bacula FileSet configurations available somewhere?
>
> You might want to check out the wiki:
> htt
21 matches
Mail list logo
