Ok I gave up on the ubuntu package and reinstalled bacula 2.2.4 from source
things are working very nicely now thank so much for all your help. My
apologizes for not stating version # in my first post but i had to try to
install on Dapper but the upgrade to Hardy was not to bad only broke a cou
Ok did the upgrade to Hardy 8.04 LTS but i have some problems
On dapper bacula package was to old 1.3 something so i installed bacula from
source 2.4.0 at the time. However now that i have upgraded i keep getting the
error below
I tried to install the bacula package because it in 2.2.8 in Hard
By the way, if you would read:
www.bacula.org -> Getting Support
you could get all this information from the bacula-users email list and by
reading the manual.
On Saturday 24 January 2009 23:18:44 Silver Salonen wrote:
> Anyway, I compiled bacula-sd with --enable-smartalloc and ran in the
> c
On Saturday 24 January 2009 23:18:44 Silver Salonen wrote:
> Anyway, I compiled bacula-sd with --enable-smartalloc and ran in the
> correct way. Is the attached traceback more usable?
Yes, you are making good progress. The dump is much better but still lacks
important information. I suggest two
Anyway, I compiled bacula-sd with --enable-smartalloc and ran in the
correct way. Is the attached traceback more usable?
--
Silver
On Sat, January 24, 2009 21:19, Silver Salonen wrote:
> OK, I'll try.. but what does "built with debug information turned on and
> not stripped of debugging symbols"
OK, I'll try.. but what does "built with debug information turned on and
not stripped of debugging symbols" mean? The only thing I found about
debugging in configure script was --enable-smartalloc - that's it?
--
Silver
On Sat, January 24, 2009 19:29, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Sorry, but
Hello,
Sorry, but the backtrace is not usable. Please make sure you have build the
SD with the debug symbols left in (i.e. do not strip it). I suggest you read
the Kaboom chapter of the manual that explains how to get a backtrace.
Kern
On Saturday 24 January 2009 17:54:05 Silver Salonen wrot
Hi.
It seems I'm experiencing the same problem on FreeBSD 6.3. I ran bacula-sd in
gdb and when the backups started running, a few of them ran and completed
successfully, but stayed in "terminated" status afterwards. Other jobs just
didn't start running. When I sent just ordinary kill to the pro
On Friday 23 January 2009 12:25:16 Graham Keeling wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:23:38AM +, Graham Keeling wrote:
> > I would like to know whether anybody else has managed to use bpipe
> > successfully.
> >
> > (Later...) I see that one of the SVN regress tests makes a mention of
> > bpipe
