Hello,
Can a (disk) volume be automatically relabelled when it is recycled?
Alex
--
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It is the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:31:29AM -0500, John Drescher wrote:
[snip question about VSS and "ntbackup backup"]
> You need both to backup the registry.
Thanks!
> You would add multiple Run= commands (one for each level) in the
> Schedule Resource:
>
> http://bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Configuring
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is to let you know that the source tar files and the Win32 binaries for
> Bacula BETA version 2.5.28-b1 have been released to the Bacula Source Forge
> download area.
This should soon be in the FreeBSD ports tree:
http://dan.langille.org/2009/01/06/bacu
Brian Debelius wrote:
> I do two things. I run an admin script after each nights run, that
> marks the last tape written to as used. I also run admin script before
> each nights run, that moves purged or recycled media to the scratch pool.
>
> This after admin scipt is for windows.
>
> :_Mark
I do two things. I run an admin script after each nights run, that
marks the last tape written to as used. I also run admin script before
each nights run, that moves purged or recycled media to the scratch pool.
This after admin scipt is for windows.
:_MarkAsUsed
set tempfile="%working_dir%\a
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Adam wrote:
> Anyone have any ideas?
>
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Adam wrote:
>>
>> I am running into problems with multi-volume DVD backups with Bacula. I
>> have an external USB 2.0 DVD writer which seems to work fine standalone;
>> however, when I attemp
Anyone have any ideas?
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Adam wrote:
> I am running into problems with multi-volume DVD backups with Bacula. I
> have an external USB 2.0 DVD writer which seems to work fine standalone;
> however, when I attempt to carry out a backup via Bacula it fails randomly
>
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:41 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>>> Yes bacula will only recycle volumes when there are no other
>>> appendable volumes in the pool.
>>>
>> Is there away to tell it to recycle regardless? That would help me better
>> determine which tapes i need to put into my autochanger.
>>
>> Yes bacula will only recycle volumes when there are no other
>> appendable volumes in the pool.
>>
> Is there away to tell it to recycle regardless? That would help me better
> determine which tapes i need to put into my autochanger.
>
I do not think so.
John
-
John Drescher-2 wrote:
>
> Yes bacula will only recycle volumes when there are no other
> appendable volumes in the pool.
>
> John
>
Is there away to tell it to recycle regardless? That would help me better
determine which tapes i need to put into my autochanger.
--
View this message in co
>> Are there other volumes in state Append while the volumes are
>> not recycled?
>>
>> Ralf
>>
>
> Yes there are, and now I understand why. Because there is at least one
> appended volume in that pool, it wont recycle the others until it needs
> to.
> Correct?
>
Correct.
Another commonly forgo
> Yes there are, and now I understand why. Because there is at least one
> appended volume in that pool, it wont recycle the others until it needs to.
> Correct?
>
Yes bacula will only recycle volumes when there are no other
appendable volumes in the pool.
John
--
On 6-Jan-09, at 1:09 PM, Allan Black wrote:
> Jeff MacDonald wrote:
>> Everything compiles now, and the file and storage daemons both work
>> fine, but look what happens when I start up the director [I'm using
>> SMF btw, just using command line during debugging]
>> timemachine# /opt/bacula/b
Ralf Gross wrote:
>
>
> Are there other volumes in state Append while the volumes are
> not recycled?
>
> Ralf
>
Yes there are, and now I understand why. Because there is at least one
appended volume in that pool, it wont recycle the others until it needs to.
Correct?
--
View this messag
Jonathan Larsen schrieb:
>
> I am having an issue with my pools not recycling correctly. Right now i have
> jobs that were last written going back as far as 2008-09-07 that have yet to
> purge and go into recycling automatically. Below is one of my Pools and
> it's configuration. All my pools a
I am having an issue with my pools not recycling correctly. Right now i have
jobs that were last written going back as far as 2008-09-07 that have yet to
purge and go into recycling automatically. Below is one of my Pools and
it's configuration. All my pools are configured the same except havin
Hello,
It looks like a bad or incomplete backtrace to me, which is what SuSE 10.2 is
well known to me for (the reason I dumped SuSE as a development platform).
Without a complete traceback that clearly shows the problem, there is not much
we can do.
Regards,
Kern
On Tuesday 06 January 2009
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On the surface, this looks like a support problem rather than a bug. The
> backtrace is perfectly normal -- no sign of a problem. However, if your SD
> is freezing up, it is possibly a bug. I would suggest that you post a
> backtrace (similar to what you p
Hello,
This is to let you know that the source tar files and the Win32 binaries for
Bacula BETA version 2.5.28-b1 have been released to the Bacula Source Forge
download area.
=
Release Notes for Bacula 2.5.2
Jeff MacDonald wrote:
> Everything compiles now, and the file and storage daemons both work
> fine, but look what happens when I start up the director [I'm using SMF
> btw, just using command line during debugging]
>
> timemachine# /opt/bacula/bin/bacula-dir -v -c
> /opt/bacula/etc/bacula-dir.c
Hello,
On the surface, this looks like a support problem rather than a bug. The
backtrace is perfectly normal -- no sign of a problem. However, if your SD
is freezing up, it is possibly a bug. I would suggest that you post a
backtrace (similar to what you posted here), but for your SD.
Aft
export LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/postgres/8.3/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
will do the trick.
You can always check with ldd if the necessary libs are found:
ldd /opt/bacula/bin/bacula-dir
--
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketpl
Hi all,
I've had a problem for a while whereby bacula hangs waiting for storage.
Here's the message I posted to the bacula-users list previously.
http://marc.info/?l=bacula-users&m=123004380923706&w=2
Yesterday I upgraded to 2.4.4 and I think I've still got that problem--bacula
still stops pro
On 4-Jan-09, at 5:16 PM, Allan Black wrote:
> Jeff MacDonald wrote:
>> Here is my configure line:
>> --enable-static-tools \
>
> I believe that is your problem. As of Solaris 10, Solaris no longer
> ships (or supports) static system libraries. There are a couple of
> (technical) reasons for t
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Mordechai T. Abzug wrote:
> I'm planning on giving bacula a try. While reading through the
> documentation, one item that I find confusing is that for Windows,
> both VSS and "ntbackup backup systemstate" are both described. Is
> "ntbackup backup systemstate" stil
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Drescher
Date: Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for:
To: marvin...@yahoo.com
> I tried that as far as I remember, but it didn't work. I will try to
> reproduce when I get back
I'm planning on giving bacula a try. While reading through the
documentation, one item that I find confusing is that for Windows,
both VSS and "ntbackup backup systemstate" are both described. Is
"ntbackup backup systemstate" still recommended, or does VSS render it
obsolete? Compare:
http:/
--- On Mon, 1/5/09, John Drescher wrote:
> From: John Drescher
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Device is BLOCKED waiting to create a volume for:
> To: "Apple Jack" , "Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net"
>
> Date: Monday, January 5, 2009, 6:23 AM
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Apple Jack
> wr
28 matches
Mail list logo