Hi Guys
I am looking to setup a schedule for two different pools and i am having
a bit of trouble getting it to do what i want.
I need it to do pool 1 on one week and then pool 2 the next week then
back to pool 1 and so on.
I can get this to happen but i have to change the tapes on Saturday
whic
>> On Nov 15, 2008, at 6:26 AM, Nils Blanck-Wehde wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> after a while my bacula-configuration files tend to get a
>> little messed up. I was wondering whether anyone tried to
>> split especially the director config-file into seperate
>> files for shedules, filesets, cl
> I have a similar problem with postgres; the catalog database is now so
> large that restoring it from a pg_dump backup takes 3-4 hours. This is
> before you account for the length of time taken to read it from the tape.
>
How big is your database? pg_dump of my 21GB database takes less than
5 mi
Nils Blanck-Wehde wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I'm setting up a new bacula installation on CentOS 5.2.
> I planned on using the FSchwarz EL5 rpms because the install very well
> under CentOS 5.2
> Now I am wondering whether it's worth the hassle to compile 2.5.16 from
> source.
> Unforunately I am no
Check out this link.
http://www.nabble.com/Split-bacula-dir.conf-file-in-many-.conf-files-td17493126.html
On Nov 15, 2008, at 6:26 AM, Nils Blanck-Wehde wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> after a while my bacula-configuration files tend to get a little
> messed up. I was wondering whether anyone tri
We use simply a pool for each server/Type of jobs here
with 10 servers it give us a
30 pools
server1D ( days )
server1W ( weeks )
server1M ( months )
...
Each pools has it's own rules ( recycling etc ..) and number of media,
We launch all them concurrently and every
Hello everyone,
after a while my bacula-configuration files tend to get a little messed
up. I was wondering whether anyone tried to split especially the
director config-file into seperate files for shedules, filesets, clients
and a general part.
Is there some kind of include-statement (besides the
Hi everyone!
I'm setting up a new bacula installation on CentOS 5.2.
I planned on using the FSchwarz EL5 rpms because the install very well
under CentOS 5.2
Now I am wondering whether it's worth the hassle to compile 2.5.16 from
source.
Unforunately I am not a programmer so the changelog of 2.5.16
Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 01:23 -0800, Kevin Keane wrote:
>
>> I'm using Bacula to back up 8 servers to a pool on a hard disk. To make
>> management somewhat easier, I configured bacula to create a new volume
>> (i.e., file) for each job. In the past, I only allowed one b
On Sat, 2008-11-15 at 01:23 -0800, Kevin Keane wrote:
> I'm using Bacula to back up 8 servers to a pool on a hard disk. To make
> management somewhat easier, I configured bacula to create a new volume
> (i.e., file) for each job. In the past, I only allowed one backup job to
> run at a time (Ma
I'm using Bacula to back up 8 servers to a pool on a hard disk. To make
management somewhat easier, I configured bacula to create a new volume
(i.e., file) for each job. In the past, I only allowed one backup job to
run at a time (Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 1) and everything worked
beautifully.
11 matches
Mail list logo
