Re: [Bacula-users] Big trouble compiling Bacula

2008-11-04 Thread Bruno Friedmann
For glibc >2.7 You have to add a gcc flags : -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 More information about are in the wiki developper part ( where explanations are given for building rpm and deb package ) This is needed for at least the fd . Reynier Perez Mira wrote: > Hi every: > Recently I install a new Ubunt

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Silver Salonen
On Monday 03 November 2008 01:29:45 Dan Langille wrote: > With the upcoming release of Bacula, what new feature are you waiting for? One more :) Resume uncompleted backup. I guess this should be quite easy to implement in Bacula 3.0 with Virtual Backup. The process would look smth like that: 1

Re: [Bacula-users] Vote: What new feature of Bacula are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Yuri Timofeev
2008/11/5 Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Nov 4, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Yuri Timofeev wrote: > >> Hi, baculaman[iacs]! >> >> Voting Form Link: http://www.makeavote.net/mavyur2685.html It is a small unofficial vote. > > > Are you aware of the voting process already in place for the project? >

[Bacula-users] cleaning tape, bar codes and autochanger

2008-11-04 Thread Craig White
My changer came with bar code labels from 01 to 000200 but nothing designating a 'cleaning' in the bar code itself. The Dell support guy says I need to put a bar code label on the cleaning tape (I'm still not sure why but I am going with the flow). so my 'update slots' command gives me... Vo

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread James Harper
> On Nov 5, 2008, at 8:31 PM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: > > + Make it possible to use several IPs on the same SD server, so that > > bacula can have different clients connect to different SD IP (well, > > actually the same machine). I know there are ways of "bonding" > > several etherne

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread James Harper
> > I have different IP addresses for my SD and create different SD > entries in bacula-dir.conf... all of them point to the same SD. > I've wondered about that too... but does the director get confused when you have concurrent jobs? As far as the director is concerned they are different storage

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Dan Langille
On Nov 5, 2008, at 12:12 AM, James Harper wrote: >> >> I have different IP addresses for my SD and create different SD >> entries in bacula-dir.conf... all of them point to the same SD. >> > > I've wondered about that too... but does the director get confused > when > you have concurrent jobs?

[Bacula-users] Different IP for the same SD

2008-11-04 Thread Dan Langille
Here is how I do different IP for the same SD. In my case, remote clients access the SD via the gateway (public IP address which is forwarded from my gateway to the SD) and local clients access the local IP address (in the 192.168. block). I have slightly altered this config from my actual, but

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 5, 2008, at 11:50 PM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: > > Hi! >> >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Nov 5, 2008, at 8:31 PM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wro

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Dan Langille
On Nov 6, 2008, at 12:20 AM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Nov 5, 2008, at 11:50 PM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: > > Hi! > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Dan Langille
On Nov 5, 2008, at 11:50 PM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Nov 5, 2008, at 8:31 PM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: > + Make it possible to use several IPs on the same SD server, so that >

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
Hi! On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:21 PM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 4, 2008, at 6:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Personal, I'd like to see more and better examples and documentation. > > > More documentation? > > You do know we have rougly 1000 pages of documentation? >

Re: [Bacula-users] Vote: What new feature of Bacula are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Dan Langille
On Nov 4, 2008, at 3:19 PM, Yuri Timofeev wrote: > Hi, baculaman[iacs]! > > Voting Form Link: http://www.makeavote.net/mavyur2685.html Are you aware of the voting process already in place for the project? http://www.bacula.org/en/rel-manual/Bacula_Projects.html -- Dan Langille http://langill

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
Hi! On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 5, 2008, at 8:31 PM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: > >> + Make it possible to use several IPs on the same SD server, so that >> bacula can have different clients connect to different SD IP (well, actual

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Dan Langille
On Nov 5, 2008, at 8:31 PM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: > + Make it possible to use several IPs on the same SD server, so that > bacula can have different clients connect to different SD IP (well, > actually the same machine). I know there are ways of "bonding" > several ethernet i

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Dan Langille
On Nov 4, 2008, at 6:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Personal, I'd like to see more and better examples and documentation. More documentation? You do know we have rougly 1000 pages of documentation? If you think something specific is missing, write it and submit the patch. Seriously. Ba

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Dan Langille
On Nov 4, 2008, at 3:18 PM, Kevin Keane wrote: > Hemant Shah wrote: >> --- On Mon, 11/3/08, Frank Sweetser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> From: Frank Sweetser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? >>> To: "junior.listas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Dan Langille
On Nov 4, 2008, at 5:31 PM, Yuri Timofeev wrote: > 2008/11/4 Silver Salonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> There's no other way besides NTBackup and this listed in >> http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=windows_bare_metal_recovery >> > > In fact this is my text. > Will there be a mention of the author

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows backups slow for remote (internet) backups only

2008-11-04 Thread Kevin Keane
What kind of Internet connection is it? Since you say, 8 Mbps, I'm guessing either a DSL or Cable modem connection; these are the only 8 Mbps Internet connections I'm aware of. Those connections are asymmetric. The 8 Mbps would only apply TO your system. The upload speed is typically much slowe

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: 1TB raid5 performance

2008-11-04 Thread Craig White
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 20:42 -0600, Lukasz Szybalski wrote: > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Jeff Kalchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> I'm talking about opening a terminal on local /home with few folders > >>> which have few hounded gb in them. > >>> I'm not connection to anything at that point

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: 1TB raid5 performance

2008-11-04 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Jeff Kalchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I'm talking about opening a terminal on local /home with few folders >>> which have few hounded gb in them. >>> I'm not connection to anything at that point. I'm talking about >>> opening a nautilus browser and that takes 2

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: 1TB raid5 performance

2008-11-04 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 8:10 PM, Jeff Kalchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I'm talking about opening a terminal on local /home with few folders >>> which have few hounded gb in them. >>> I'm not connection to anything at that point. I'm talking about >>> opening a nautilus browser and that takes 2

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: 1TB raid5 performance

2008-11-04 Thread Jeff Kalchik
>> I'm talking about opening a terminal on local /home with few folders >> which have few hounded gb in them. >> I'm not connection to anything at that point. I'm talking about >> opening a nautilus browser and that takes 2 seconds. >> Not sure what ldap, windbind or nscd have to do with file syste

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Flavio Junior
Hi ;) .. I think would be nice support for LTO-4 Libraries... I'd bought a TS3100 LTO-4 Library and need to use TSM with it :( I'll really prefer to use bacula instead. PS: I have no idea about problems to make it works (licensing, hardware, proprietary issues) sorry :) -- Flávio do Carmo

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa
Hi! I was just thinking: In the next few days, I'll be configuring a 10 drive, and 245 tapes, LTO-4 autochanger... I mean, 10 drives, at ~120MB/s each drive.. well a LOT of speed. I don't think it makes sense to configure *all* these drives on the same server (I mean, the network is

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Mark V
Bacula is fantastic. Two things would be useful: 1) bsmtp sends mail direct to google without any intermediate mail server... I got this to work using ssmtp (see link below) and rewriting the mail commands. http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/SuSE/2008-07/msg01593.html 2) Support for szip (l

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: 1TB raid5 performance

2008-11-04 Thread John Drescher
> I'm talking about opening a terminal on local /home with few folders > which have few hounded gb in them. > I'm not connection to anything at that point. I'm talking about > opening a nautilus browser and that takes 2 seconds. > Not sure what ldap, windbind or nscd have to do with file system > a

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread c-base_bacula
Hi All, In general, there is a good way to determine which features are required for a backup system, therefore it is required to imagine what the *most ideal backup system* would look like, using the TRIZ analysis method. The resulting 'most ideal system for making remote backups' will be som

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: 1TB raid5 performance

2008-11-04 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
I'm talking about opening a terminal on local /home with few folders which have few hounded gb in them. I'm not connection to anything at that point. I'm talking about opening a nautilus browser and that takes 2 seconds. Not sure what ldap, windbind or nscd have to do with file system access time?

[Bacula-users] Fwd: 1TB raid5 performance

2008-11-04 Thread John Drescher
-- Forwarded message -- From: John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:34 PM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] 1TB raid5 performance To: Lukasz Szybalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ext3, 4x500gb, raid5, with 8gb of ram, and amd opteron with debian amd64 > > For some reas

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Yuri Timofeev
2008/11/4 Silver Salonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > There's no other way besides NTBackup and this listed in > http://wiki.bacula.org/doku.php?id=windows_bare_metal_recovery > In fact this is my text. Will there be a mention of the author (me)? http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:tb2DL1GRHVsJ:www.ma

[Bacula-users] 1TB raid5 performance

2008-11-04 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
Hello, I am running bacula on a software raid5 running debian stable with mdadm, and I was wondering if somebody on this list is a sys admin and uses similar setup a lot and has these "steps" to increase servers performance. ext3, 4x500gb, raid5, with 8gb of ram, and amd opteron with debian amd64

Re: [Bacula-users] slow performance copy/migrate disk to tape

2008-11-04 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:21:54PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 22:38 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:02:46PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Problem: Migrate/Copy jobs from disk pool (DiskBackup) > > > to tape (DiskCo

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread John Drescher
> Server side compression. Latest server systems have four, six (AMD/Intel) or > eight (SUN Niagara 2) cores per processor. So a 2-4 processor system could > have until 32 cores. A single Intel 2.33 GHz quadcore processor can compress > data by software with about 60 MB/s (gzip, fastest compression

Re: [Bacula-users] slow performance copy/migrate disk to tape

2008-11-04 Thread Ulrich Leodolter
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 23:37 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:21:54PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 22:38 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:02:46PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Prob

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Michael Heim
On 03.11.2008 00:29, Dan Langille wrote: With the upcoming release of Bacula, what new feature are you waiting for? This are my favorites: * Migration/Copy from SD to another SD via Ethernet. Very interesting in desaster recovery (DR) szenarios. * Server side compression. Latest

Re: [Bacula-users] slow performance copy/migrate disk to tape

2008-11-04 Thread Ulrich Leodolter
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 22:38 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:02:46PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Problem: Migrate/Copy jobs from disk pool (DiskBackup) > > to tape (DiskCopy) only get overall speed of 10-20MB/s. > > > > full backup job size varies fr

Re: [Bacula-users] slow performance copy/migrate disk to tape

2008-11-04 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 09:02:46PM +0100, Ulrich Leodolter wrote: > Hi, > > Problem: Migrate/Copy jobs from disk pool (DiskBackup) > to tape (DiskCopy) only get overall speed of 10-20MB/s. > > full backup job size varies from 10-50GB. > > Pool setup is simple, just one pool for full an incremen

[Bacula-users] Fwd: What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread John Drescher
-- Forwarded message -- From: John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:35 PM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? To: Kevin Keane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Converting it to an XML file would not pose the problems specified in the >

[Bacula-users] Windows backups slow for remote (internet) backups only

2008-11-04 Thread Marc DeTrano
I am having a problem where Bacula backups of Windows machines are running slow, only when saving to a storage daemon across the internet. Here's what I have so far: -Bacula Director and Local SD, 2.2.8, running on Mandriva Linux 2008.1 -Remote SD 2.4.2, running on RHEL 4 -Windows FD, 2.4.3, ru

[Bacula-users] Vote: What new feature of Bacula are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Yuri Timofeev
Hi, baculaman[iacs]! Voting Form Link: http://www.makeavote.net/mavyur2685.html -- with best regards - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Kevin Keane
Hemant Shah wrote: > --- On Mon, 11/3/08, Frank Sweetser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> From: Frank Sweetser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? >> To: "junior.listas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: "bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net" >> Date

[Bacula-users] slow performance copy/migrate disk to tape

2008-11-04 Thread Ulrich Leodolter
Hi, Problem: Migrate/Copy jobs from disk pool (DiskBackup) to tape (DiskCopy) only get overall speed of 10-20MB/s. full backup job size varies from 10-50GB. Pool setup is simple, just one pool for full an incremental backups to disk (automatic recycle works good) Pool { Name = DiskBackup P

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: File daemonat "192.168.0.13:9102"rejected Hello command

2008-11-04 Thread Kevin Keane
Somebody else mentioned that the same problem occured with 64-bit Vista. As far as I know, Windows 2008 is primarily 64 bit (although there is a 32-bit version available). Maybe it helps if you can use Wireshark or similar to see what is actually being sent/received? Stefan Eriksson wrote: > Ye

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Yuri Timofeev
I think that to do ALL backups to tape - a bad strategy. The advantages of using tape to store long-term (6months -- 5 years and more) archival. In other cases, better use of HDD. imho I have important business data backup is stored 3--5 years in 2 places: on disk and tape. Therefore, it turns o

Re: [Bacula-users] Fwd: Bacula and LTO4 weirdness.

2008-11-04 Thread Alex Chekholko
Hi, This is one of my LTO-4 drives, mostly defaults, I think: Device { Name = Drive-0 Drive Index = 0 Media Type = LTO-4 Archive Device = /dev/nst1 AutomaticMount = yes; AlwaysOpen = yes; RemovableMedia = yes; RandomAccess = no; AutoChanger =

Re: [Bacula-users] SD not using more than 1 drive in autochanger

2008-11-04 Thread Alex Chekholko
On Mon, 3 Nov 2008 16:23:10 -0600 "Jeff Falgout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > *status > > > > > > Device status: > > Autochanger "T200-1" with devices: > > "T200-1-Drive-0" (/dev/nst0) > > "T200-1-Drive-2" (/dev/nst1) > > "T200-1-Drive-3" (/dev/nst2) > > Device "T200-1-Drive-0" (/dev/

[Bacula-users] Network error when running a Full backup

2008-11-04 Thread Matias Banchoff
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I'm having a problem with a windows 2003 server since some weeks. The problem appears to happend randomly when I run Full backups (Some full backup jobs end successfuly, while others don't). This is an example of the error: - --

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread T. Horsnell
For a single job to be able to use multiple tapedrives simultaneously, when backing up to a single pool. I whinged about this some months ago, but looks like it may be a difficult task. Cheers, Terry - This SF.Net email is

[Bacula-users] Bacula Web - Trac all jobs in a schedule?

2008-11-04 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
B-W feature question: Could we write a query that examines overall pool volume write capacity? It would be nice to track historical bytes written by a select set of jobs (normally started by a single schedule entry). I don't think that a data structure exists in the database that links jobs to a

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread John Drescher
> Converting it to an XML file would not pose the problems specified in the > above wiki, there are lots of tools to create/parse XML files tha could be > useful. > I would vote against this if I could. I mean this will make it harder for me to edit the configuration files through ssh and to me

Re: [Bacula-users] How to check if tape is labeled by bacula?

2008-11-04 Thread Timo Neuvonen
"Hemant Shah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti viestissä news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Folks, > > I want to setup a cron job to remind me to insert new tape for the > backup. The script checks if the tape drive already has a tape, next I > want to check if the tape is already labeled by bacula. If it i

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Timo Neuvonen
"Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti viestissä news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > With the upcoming release of Bacula, what new feature are you waiting for? > > Me? I'm waiting for duplicate job control. I had to change a tape > today, but I was busy: > If would appreciate some level of fault tol

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: File daemonat "192.168.0.13:9102"rejected Hello command

2008-11-04 Thread Stefan Eriksson
Yes I can telnet 192.168.0.13 on port 9102 with no problem so the port is open, As for vmware networking, it shouldnt be an issue as it works great with windows 2003. And I dont think its a fw issue as I've completely turned of the firewall and still no go. As for connections, the bacula server do

[Bacula-users] How to check if tape is labeled by bacula?

2008-11-04 Thread Hemant Shah
Folks, I want to setup a cron job to remind me to insert new tape for the backup. The script checks if the tape drive already has a tape, next I want to check if the tape is already labeled by bacula. If it is labeled then I want to send e-mail asking me to put it unlabeled tape. I have setup

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: File daemonat "192.168.0.13:9102"rejected Hello command

2008-11-04 Thread Timo Neuvonen
>>> 04-Nov 13:31 backup-dir: test.2008-11-04_13.31.41 Fatal error: File >>> daemon >>> at "192.168.0.13:9102" rejected Hello command >>> 04-Nov 13:31 backup-dir: test.2008-11-04_13.31.41 Error: Bacula >>> backup-dir >>> 2.2.4 (14Sep07): 04-Nov-2008 13:31:44 >>> >>> Hello I'm getting this error with

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Hemant Shah
--- On Mon, 11/3/08, Frank Sweetser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Frank Sweetser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for? > To: "junior.listas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net" > Date: Monday, November 3, 2008, 9:

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: File daemon at "192.168.0.13:9102" rejected Hello command

2008-11-04 Thread Stefan Eriksson
Thanks but it didnt help. Shadow copy was already disabled on the drive I completely turned of the firewall and tried, still no go. It is a 64bit edition of windows 2008 running on vmware, might the virtual disk be the problem? -- Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: File daemo

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Dan Langille
On Nov 4, 2008, at 8:56 AM, Kevin Keane wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: >> >> On Nov 3, 2008, at 11:10 PM, Kevin Keane wrote: >>> >>> - Documentation updates. It's tricky to piece together the >>> information >>> about the correct information for anything past version 1.38. >> >> >> Can you elabor

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula with MSL G3 Series

2008-11-04 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Howto tell HP G3 to turn off "prevent media removal" ? I have search for a > solution, but not found it... yet. I hope you can help, Shot into the dark: Do you have AlwaysOpen = yes in the Device section of your bacula-sd.conf file? Operating systems tend to i

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: File daemon at "192.168.0.13:9102" rejected Hello command

2008-11-04 Thread Mathias Stjernström
Hi Stefan! We have seen something similar when running VSS on 64 bits windows system. If you have 64 bits windows you can try switching VSS off. Cheers! Mathias Stjernström On 4 nov 2008, at 13.35, Stefan Eriksson wrote: 04-Nov 13:31 backup-dir: test.2008-11-04_13.31.41 Fatal error: File

[Bacula-users] Bacula with MSL G3 Series

2008-11-04 Thread lars . breimo
Hi, I try again. Hi, my bacula are configured with Autochanger, running standard mtx-changer with an HP MSL G3 with 24 slots, but the auto changing, some times, will not work when media is full, and after spending hours of testing, i wonder if it is the "prevent media removal" thats the iss

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: File daemon at "192.168.0.13:9102"rejected Hello command

2008-11-04 Thread Stefan Eriksson
Suspected that, but which type of package is the hello message, I suspect its not on a specific port. More like a echo request. -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Timo Neuvonen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Skickat: den 4 november 2008 14:42 Till: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Ämne: Re: [B

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Kevin Keane
Dan Langille wrote: > > On Nov 3, 2008, at 11:10 PM, Kevin Keane wrote: >> >> - Documentation updates. It's tricky to piece together the information >> about the correct information for anything past version 1.38. > > > Can you elaborate upon that? > > You can download the docs for any given versio

Re: [Bacula-users] Fatal error: File daemon at "192.168.0.13:9102"rejected Hello command

2008-11-04 Thread Timo Neuvonen
"Stefan Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kirjoitti viestissä news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > 04-Nov 13:31 backup-dir: test.2008-11-04_13.31.41 Fatal error: File daemon > at "192.168.0.13:9102" rejected Hello command > 04-Nov 13:31 backup-dir: test.2008-11-04_13.31.41 Error: Bacula backup-dir > 2.2.4 (14Sep0

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Dan Langille
On Nov 3, 2008, at 11:10 PM, Kevin Keane wrote: > > - Documentation updates. It's tricky to piece together the information > about the correct information for anything past version 1.38. Can you elaborate upon that? You can download the docs for any given version... Or are you the person that

[Bacula-users] Fatal error: File daemon at "192.168.0.13:9102" rejected Hello command

2008-11-04 Thread Stefan Eriksson
04-Nov 13:31 backup-dir: test.2008-11-04_13.31.41 Fatal error: File daemon at "192.168.0.13:9102" rejected Hello command 04-Nov 13:31 backup-dir: test.2008-11-04_13.31.41 Error: Bacula backup-dir 2.2.4 (14Sep07): 04-Nov-2008 13:31:44 Hello I'm getting this error with the client using windows 2008.

Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot find any appendable volumes. (but they are there!)

2008-11-04 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Mingus Dew wrote: > I hope someone answers your question. I've seen this same issue reported my > me and others with no admission that there is a bug. I personally can't find > anything wrong with my configuration. Could you check your bacula.log for > any errors in the tape jobs prior. I've no

Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot find any appendable volumes. (but they are there!)

2008-11-04 Thread Mingus Dew
I hope someone answers your question. I've seen this same issue reported my me and others with no admission that there is a bug. I personally can't find anything wrong with my configuration. Could you check your bacula.log for any errors in the tape jobs prior. I've noticed that library error (mtx

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Kevin Keane
Sebastian Lehmann wrote: > Am Di 04.11.2008 10:42 schrieb Silver Salonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> On Tuesday 04 November 2008 11:22:12 Sebastian Lehmann wrote: >> >>> Am Di 04.11.2008 05:10 schrieb Kevin Keane >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> - Native support for Windows system s

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Sebastian Lehmann
Am Di 04.11.2008 11:07 schrieb Silver Salonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tuesday 04 November 2008 12:01:06 Sebastian Lehmann wrote: > > > > Am Di 04.11.2008 10:42 schrieb Silver Salonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On Tuesday 04 November 2008 11:22:12 Sebastian Lehmann wrote: > > > > Am Di 04

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Silver Salonen
On Tuesday 04 November 2008 12:01:06 Sebastian Lehmann wrote: > > Am Di 04.11.2008 10:42 schrieb Silver Salonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Tuesday 04 November 2008 11:22:12 Sebastian Lehmann wrote: > > > Am Di 04.11.2008 05:10 schrieb Kevin Keane > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > - Native sup

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Sebastian Lehmann
Am Di 04.11.2008 10:42 schrieb Silver Salonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tuesday 04 November 2008 11:22:12 Sebastian Lehmann wrote: > > Am Di 04.11.2008 05:10 schrieb Kevin Keane > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > - Native support for Windows system state backup without using > > > NTBackup. > > > Ide

Re: [Bacula-users] Storage daemon didn't accept Device "FifoStorage"

2008-11-04 Thread Isabel Bermejo
Thanks for your answer but I'm still having problems backing up the database using a fifo. How can I perform the directives you explain for my client run before job script? >a) close its file handles so it can go into background and not interfere with the FD >b) background itself >c) create the FI

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Silver Salonen
On Tuesday 04 November 2008 11:22:12 Sebastian Lehmann wrote: > Am Di 04.11.2008 05:10 schrieb Kevin Keane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > - Native support for Windows system state backup without using > > NTBackup. > > Ideally including a full ASR. > > > It's is implemented since Bacula supports VSS. Yo

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Sebastian Lehmann
Hi, Am Di 04.11.2008 05:10 schrieb Kevin Keane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Here is my wish list. I hope I'm not including things that already > exist... > > What I would like to see is more support for backing up to removable > hard disks. Specifically: > > - Have bacula delete the actual file on d

Re: [Bacula-users] What new feature are you waiting for?

2008-11-04 Thread Alex Ehrlich
EFS support on Windows is my dream. Alex Ehrlich - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a tr

[Bacula-users] Cannot find any appendable volumes. (but they are there!)

2008-11-04 Thread Joerg Wunsch
I see there's another message with that subject already. My problem's a little different: the appendable volume /is/ there, but Bacula refuses to use it. The drive is BLOCKED, and I don't know how to make it proceed. I eventually gave up, and killed the job so the other outstanding jobs could at