Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Patches

2008-10-25 Thread Ulrich Leodolter
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 21:11 +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote: > Le Saturday 25 October 2008 13:41:15 Ulrich Leodolter, vous avez écrit : > > On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 11:32 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > For some time now, I haven't really been happy with the Bacula patch > > > proced

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Patches

2008-10-25 Thread Eric Bollengier
Le Saturday 25 October 2008 13:41:15 Ulrich Leodolter, vous avez écrit : > On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 11:32 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Hello, > > > > For some time now, I haven't really been happy with the Bacula patch > > procedure. Basically, when we fix a bug (either from a bug report or > > ours

Re: [Bacula-users] InChanger flag not reset

2008-10-25 Thread LeJav
in fact, i am now not sure about my test for update volume i will do it again monday i think it might work this could be a workaround for my problem > I have tested it with the good syntax, of course ! > but InChanger flag did not change > >> Yes, for sure, but it's quite easy to find the ri

Re: [Bacula-users] InChanger flag not reset

2008-10-25 Thread LeJav
I have tested it with the good syntax, of course ! but InChanger flag did not change > Yes, for sure, but it's quite easy to find the right syntax > > *update volume=vol75 inchanger=0 > Invalid value. It must be yes or no. > *update volume=vol75 inchanger=no > New InChanger flag is: no > -

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Patches

2008-10-25 Thread Ulrich Leodolter
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 11:32 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Hello, > > For some time now, I haven't really been happy with the Bacula patch > procedure. Basically, when we fix a bug (either from a bug report or > ourselves), we usually generate a patch, post it to the bug report, if any, > and up

Re: [Bacula-users] InChanger flag not reset

2008-10-25 Thread ebollengier
Yes, for sure, but it's quite easy to find the right syntax *update volume=vol75 inchanger=0 Invalid value. It must be yes or no. *update volume=vol75 inchanger=no New InChanger flag is: no LeJav wrote: > > even "update volume=xxx inchanger=0" does not work > > >> Hello, >> >> Yes, it

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Unlimited Retention

2008-10-25 Thread LeJav
I have tried the patch with success. I can now set a retention of 100 years ! he is the trace for 38 years: fn-archnfs-dir: ua_prune.c:208-0 select now=1224854259 period=1198368000 sql=SELECT count(*) from Job WHERE JobTDate<26486259 AND ClientId=1 AND PurgedFiles=0 and now for 100 years, the di

Re: [Bacula-users] First use of volumes

2008-10-25 Thread Kshatriya
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Timo Neuvonen wrote: > Does "llist media" help? (note the double "l", as "long list") > > There you can see when the tape was labeled, and first time written into. It would be great and it would be what I want, but unfortunatly LabelDate equals FirstWritten. For example a ta

[Bacula-users] Patches

2008-10-25 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, For some time now, I haven't really been happy with the Bacula patch procedure. Basically, when we fix a bug (either from a bug report or ourselves), we usually generate a patch, post it to the bug report, if any, and upload it to the Bacula patches area of Source Forge. Providing you a