-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Drescher wrote:
|> This does not happen under Bacula 2.2.8 on FreeBSD.
|>
|> Sounds to me like this is a not a Bacula-specific issue, but rather
|> something introduced by the packaging.
|>
|
| It happens for me with gentoo which the package manag
> This does not happen under Bacula 2.2.8 on FreeBSD.
>
> Sounds to me like this is a not a Bacula-specific issue, but rather
> something introduced by the packaging.
>
It happens for me with gentoo which the package manager builds it from
the source.
John
---
Michel Meyers wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> James Harper wrote:
> | I'm not sure if this is just something peculiar to my configuration, but
> | in the text console for bacula, if I type a command then backspace over
> | it then press enter, bacula still acts as if I
James Harper wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is just something peculiar to my configuration, but
> in the text console for bacula, if I type a command then backspace over
> it then press enter, bacula still acts as if I typed the command, or at
> least part of it.
>
> Does anyone else see this or is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Harper wrote:
| I'm not sure if this is just something peculiar to my configuration, but
| in the text console for bacula, if I type a command then backspace over
| it then press enter, bacula still acts as if I typed the command, or at
| least p
Hi tomasz,
on 01.02.2008 12:56 you wrote:
> bacula do not track or care about scripts running as before_backup
> thingy if they are successful or not.
>
> bacula care about files to backup
>
> if 'external' script for some reason failed i does not mean it is
> important for bacula.
Yes it does
Hi,
I have just moved from ver. 1.38.5 to 2.2.8 and the first backup job was
supposed to run tonight. It started at 23:00 and nothing happened. Device status
said:
Device status:
Device "FileBackup" (/dataspace/bacula-backups) is not open.
Device "Tape" (/dev/nst0) is not open.
Device is
I'm not sure if this is just something peculiar to my configuration, but
in the text console for bacula, if I type a command then backspace over
it then press enter, bacula still acts as if I typed the command, or at
least part of it.
Does anyone else see this or is it just me?
James
---
>
> The first thing I'd check is to make sure that the partition holding
/tmp
> isn't running out of space. If it is, either tell MySQL to use a
> different
> directory with more space, or increase the amount of space allocated
to
> /tmp.
>
When I just checked now, /var/log/mysql had about 2G o
> Hi,
>
> I think I stumbled upon a problem with multiple drives and
> concurrent jobs.
> I read the changelog for 2.2.8 and there were some changes, but
> apparently
> the following was not fixed.
I am having the same issue.
Regards
Matt
---
Hello,
> root 3262 1 0 Feb01 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/bacula-fd -u
> root -g bacula -c /etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf
> root 3265 3262 0 Feb01 ?00:00:01 /usr/sbin/bacula-fd -u
> root -g bacula -c /etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf
> root 3266 3265 0 Feb01 ?00:00:00
Hi all,
I installed bacula fd from onto a RHEL3 from the fschwarz rpms-contrib.
The rpm is bacula-client-2.2.7-1.el3.i386.rpm. When I run "service bacula-fd
start", bacula does seem to start normally. However, a ps shows this:
root 3262 1 0 Feb01 ?00:00:00 /usr/sbin/bacula-f
Hi,
I think I stumbled upon a problem with multiple drives and concurrent jobs.
I read the changelog for 2.2.8 and there were some changes, but apparently
the following was not fixed.
- Debian 4.0 i386 / Bacula 2.2.8 / MySQL
- an autochanger with 2 drives:
Drive-1 = /dev/nst0 = mtx-changer "d
James Harper wrote:
> I've been using bacula on a Xen server for many months with no problems
> at all. A week ago I set up some jobs to run concurrently to the
> existing jobs to back up some remote clients to a remote sd.
>
> Since then, jobs aren't completing and are hanging around and things a
I've been using bacula on a Xen server for many months with no problems
at all. A week ago I set up some jobs to run concurrently to the
existing jobs to back up some remote clients to a remote sd.
Since then, jobs aren't completing and are hanging around and things are
just not running well, alth
>> Does anyone have recent experiencies with installing Bacula file daemon
>> to
>> Windows 95 system?
>> My typical Win95 system in this case is ~100 MHz Pentium, with 32 or 64
>> MB
>> of RAM. Any chances I could get Bacula running on them? My goal is just
>> to
>> have a very basic "copy all
Hey, stop that ROTFALMAO stuff... I'm serious with this! :-)
Does anyone have recent experiencies with installing Bacula file daemon to
Windows 95 system?
The latest manual says "we have coded to support Win95, but have no longer a
system for testing". Same phrase exists already in the oldest m
17 matches
Mail list logo
