Re: [Bacula-users] bconsole can't connect with bacula-director

2008-01-13 Thread Frank Sweetser
Reynier Perez Mira wrote: > Well I add this line: "127.0.0.1 gsdserver" to the hosts file and the same > error still appear. Why? That likely means that either the director is not listening on that port, possibly because it's not running, or you've got a firewall rule blocking it. To confirm thi

Re: [Bacula-users] bconsole can't connect with bacula-director

2008-01-13 Thread Reynier Perez Mira
Well I add this line: "127.0.0.1 gsdserver" to the hosts file and the same error still appear. Why? Ing. Reynier Pérez Mira > -Mensaje original- > De: Frank Sweetser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: lunes, 14 de enero de 2008 1:46 am > Para: Reynier Perez Mira > CC: bacula-user

Re: [Bacula-users] bconsole can't connect with bacula-director

2008-01-13 Thread Frank Sweetser
Reynier Perez Mira wrote: >> gsdserver doesn't resolve to the host that the director >> is running on > > Maybe, this is the main error. When I restart Apache this error show up: >> /etc/init.d/apache2 restart > * Restarting web server apache2 >

Re: [Bacula-users] bconsole can't connect with bacula-director

2008-01-13 Thread John Drescher
On Jan 13, 2008 7:09 PM, Reynier Perez Mira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > gsdserver doesn't resolve to the host that the director > > is running on > > Maybe, this is the main error. When I restart Apache this error show up: > > /etc/init.d/apache2 restart > * Restarting web server apache2 > apa

Re: [Bacula-users] bconsole can't connect with bacula-director

2008-01-13 Thread Reynier Perez Mira
> gsdserver doesn't resolve to the host that the director > is running on Maybe, this is the main error. When I restart Apache this error show up: > /etc/init.d/apache2 restart * Restarting web server apache2 apache2: Could not reliably determine

Re: [Bacula-users] bconsole can't connect with bacula-director

2008-01-13 Thread Frank Sweetser
Reynier Perez Mira wrote: > bconsole Connecting to Director gsdserver:9101 13-ene 17:51 bconsole JobId > 0: Fatal error: bsock.c:129 Unable to connect to Director daemon on > gsdserver:9101. ERR=Conexión rechazada I'm going to guess that the ERR here is something along the lines of connection ref

Re: [Bacula-users] autochanger with two drives

2008-01-13 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 14.01.2008 00:43, Mike Seda wrote: > hi arno, > please see inline responses: > > Arno Lehmann wrote: job concurrency set up but not working: >> If that's more than one, you should check the job priorities - Bacula >> will only run jobs with identical priority simultaneously. >> > wow... i

Re: [Bacula-users] autochanger with two drives

2008-01-13 Thread Mike Seda
hi arno, please see inline responses: Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > 13.01.2008 00:06, Mike Seda wrote: > >> hi arno, >> i have matched up my config to the example that you gave. so now i have: >> FD: 20 >> SD: 20 >> DIR/Jobs: 1 >> DIR/Director: 20 >> DIR/Storage1(Autochanger): 4 >> >> but,

[Bacula-users] bconsole can't connect with bacula-director

2008-01-13 Thread Reynier Perez Mira
Hi every: After some post here I take a breath and start from zero. Now I have bacula installed running but I think it's not configured yet. I try to admin using Webmin and get this error: The Bacula console command /etc/bacula/bconsole could not communicate with the Bacula director. Make sure

[Bacula-users] Jobs not getting canceled after "Max Start Delay" exceeded

2008-01-13 Thread Goetz Rieger
Hi: I've got a problem configuring my backup with Bacula 2.2.1. My config is more or less following the "Daily Tape Rotation" scheme described in the "Backup Strategies" in the manual. I've got four jobs configured nightly at 11:00 with different priorities (three clients and the backup DB). All

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem compiling Bacula

2008-01-13 Thread Reynier Perez Mira
> should do it Well I solve the problem running only: ./configure --enable-bwx-console --enable-tray-monitor --with-mysql Thanks a lot Ing. Reynier Pérez Mira - Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem compiling Bacula

2008-01-13 Thread Arjen
Reynier Perez Mira wrote: > > > As you have noticed I have libmysqlclient15-dev installed. So this is not the > problem. I run again ./configure --enable-bwx-console --enable-tray-monitor > --with-mysql=/usr/include/mysql but I get the same error again and again. > > ./configure --enable-bw

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem compiling Bacula

2008-01-13 Thread Reynier Perez Mira
Hi Arjen: > apt-get install libmysqlclient-dev apt-get install libmysqlclient-dev Leyendo lista de paquetes... Hecho Creando árbol de dependencias Leyendo la información de estado... Hecho Nota, seleccionando libmysqlclient15-dev en lugar de libmysqlclient-dev libmysqlclient15-dev ya está en su v

Re: [Bacula-users] autochanger with two drives

2008-01-13 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 13.01.2008 00:06, Mike Seda wrote: > hi arno, > i have matched up my config to the example that you gave. so now i have: > FD: 20 > SD: 20 > DIR/Jobs: 1 > DIR/Director: 20 > DIR/Storage1(Autochanger): 4 > > but, jobs still seem to run in serial... any thoughts? Have you reloaded the conf

Re: [Bacula-users] Should a restore be this slow?

2008-01-13 Thread Michel Meyers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Harper wrote: >>> Assuming that 2 hours is on the high side of what you would expect, > what >>> should I be looking at to try and improve restore times? >> What version of Bacula are you using? >> > > dir & sd = 2.2.0 > client = 2.0.3 > mysql =

Re: [Bacula-users] Should a restore be this slow?

2008-01-13 Thread James Harper
> > Assuming that 2 hours is on the high side of what you would expect, what > > should I be looking at to try and improve restore times? > > What version of Bacula are you using? > dir & sd = 2.2.0 client = 2.0.3 mysql = 5.0.32 (from Debian) dir, sd, and mysql are all on a Debian system client

Re: [Bacula-users] Should a restore be this slow?

2008-01-13 Thread Michel Meyers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Harper wrote: > I'm just doing a restore of a few files, and it is a lot slower than I > would have thought it should be. > > The backup I'm restoring from is 1 of about 9 on the same disk based > volume. That backup is just over 1.2G, and I'm r