Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-17 Thread Dan Langille
On 18 Aug 2007 at 2:00, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Since upgrading to 2.2.0 bsmtp sets the wrong Date: header in the mail: > Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:48:56 + (CEST) > > For the recipient the above message appears to have been receieved at > 03:48, two hours ahead. > > The correct timezone

[Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-17 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Since upgrading to 2.2.0 bsmtp sets the wrong Date: header in the mail: Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:48:56 + (CEST) For the recipient the above message appears to have been receieved at 03:48, two hours ahead. The correct timezone is UTC +2, the above header should have read Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2

Re: [Bacula-users] dual-NICs and traffic balancing

2007-08-17 Thread Ivan Adzhubey
Hi Martin, On Friday 17 August 2007 04:46:24 pm you wrote: > > where x.x.x.227 is client's external NIC address, x.x.x.136 is bacula > > server's external address; 192.168.0.{253,200} are the corresponding > > private addresses. As you can see, while fd daemon on client has indeed > > been bound t

Re: [Bacula-users] upgrade 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, got "The number of files mismatch"

2007-08-17 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:27:17 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark said: >> Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >>> So, >>> >>> What did I do wrong here? >>> >>> I upgraded bacula from 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, FreeBSD 6. >>> Yesterdays nightly job failed big time, each backup failed with >>> >>> 16-A

Re: [Bacula-users] dual-NICs and traffic balancing

2007-08-17 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:36:48 -0400, Ivan Adzhubey said: > > Hi, > > I am having trouble with my dual-NIC servers: it seems there is no way to > force bacula client on a remote server use a particular fixed > interface/address for data transfers. Even though I have set FDAddress to a > pr

Re: [Bacula-users] Software Compression only sometimes works

2007-08-17 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:38:40 -0500 (CDT), Andrew Noonan said: > Importance: Normal > > On Thu, August 16, 2007 2:29 pm, Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > >> On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:02:05 -0500 (CDT), Andrew Noonan said: > >> Importance: Normal > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >>

Re: [Bacula-users] Problems with recycling

2007-08-17 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:21:02 +0200, Juan Asensio Sánchez said: > > Hi > > I am tetsing Bacula. I have configured it to work with mysql. I have > one pool with only one tape. There are 5 jobs to be backed up on that > tape. Jobs are running weekly. This is the pool configuration: > > Pool {

Re: [Bacula-users] upgrade 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, got "The number of files mismatch"

2007-08-17 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 19:27:17 +0200, Per olof Ljungmark said: > > Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > > So, > > > > What did I do wrong here? > > > > I upgraded bacula from 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, FreeBSD 6. > > Yesterdays nightly job failed big time, each backup failed with > > > > 16-Aug 21:46 candyman-

Re: [Bacula-users] pwd of RunBeforeScript

2007-08-17 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:51:34 -0400, Dan Langille said: > > Has anyone encountered this situation? The pwd of the > RunBeforeScript is the directory into which the source code was > unpacked. > > To reproduce, use this RunBeforeScript: > > #!/bin/sin > echo $PWD > > The output is: > >

Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL (Innodb) - "table is full" ???

2007-08-17 Thread Drew Bentley
On 8/17/07, Alan Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Drew Bentley wrote: > > > Yeah, autoextend for InnoDB seems to have bitten you. I usually never > > do this and have monitors to tell me if it's reaching a certain > > threshold, as you're probably not even using all of the In

[Bacula-users] pwd of RunBeforeScript

2007-08-17 Thread Dan Langille
Has anyone encountered this situation? The pwd of the RunBeforeScript is the directory into which the source code was unpacked. To reproduce, use this RunBeforeScript: #!/bin/sin echo $PWD The output is: 17-Aug 13:28 ducky-dir: BeforeJob: run command "/home/dan/bin/test_pwd" 17-Aug 13:28 du

Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL (Innodb) - "table is full" ???

2007-08-17 Thread Alan Brown
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Drew Bentley wrote: > Yeah, autoextend for InnoDB seems to have bitten you. I usually never > do this and have monitors to tell me if it's reaching a certain > threshold, as you're probably not even using all of the InnoDB space > allocated, as it's not particularly nice in gi

Re: [Bacula-users] upgrade 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, got "The number of files mismatch"

2007-08-17 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > So, > > What did I do wrong here? > > I upgraded bacula from 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, FreeBSD 6. > Yesterdays nightly job failed big time, each backup failed with > > 16-Aug 21:46 candyman-sd: Volume "UNW259L2" previously written, moving > to end of data. > 16-Aug 21:47 candy

Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL (Innodb) - "table is full" ???

2007-08-17 Thread Drew Bentley
On 8/17/07, Alan Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Alan Brown wrote: > > > innodb_data_file_path = ibdata1:26000M;ibdata2:2000M:autoextend > > > > (As I understand it, this should grow the tablespace as needed) > > Doh! > > FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted o

Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL (Innodb) - "table is full" ???

2007-08-17 Thread Alan Brown
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Drew Bentley wrote: > You'll either need to add more InnoDB by adding more to your > /etc/my.cnf file or convert the tables to use MyISAM. Usually depends > on what MySQL will use as default or if someone else created the > InnoDB space but you can easily add more by editing t

Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL (Innodb) - "table is full" ???

2007-08-17 Thread Alan Brown
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Alan Brown wrote: > innodb_data_file_path = ibdata1:26000M;ibdata2:2000M:autoextend > > (As I understand it, this should grow the tablespace as needed) Doh! FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroupMSSLAY01-LogVolSQL

[Bacula-users] bacula windows 2.2.0 uninstall crash and installer config issue?

2007-08-17 Thread Bob Hetzel
I'm trying to create internal documentation for others to install the bacula-fd on various windows computers around here. I just installed bacula 2.2.0. Since it didn't give me most of the configuration screen prompts, I decided to backup my config file then uninstall it. The uninstaller se

Re: [Bacula-users] NFS or bacula-fd, which one is faster?

2007-08-17 Thread Alan Brown
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Ivan Adzhubey wrote: > I have a Linux NFS fileserver which has to be backed up to a bacula server on > another Linux box. The fileserver in question exports everything that's > needed to be backed up so all files are actually accessible on bacula server > via NFS as well. Shou

[Bacula-users] Problems with recycling

2007-08-17 Thread Juan Asensio Sánchez
Hi I am tetsing Bacula. I have configured it to work with mysql. I have one pool with only one tape. There are 5 jobs to be backed up on that tape. Jobs are running weekly. This is the pool configuration: Pool { Name = PoolCintasDiariasMartes Pool Type = Backup AutoPrune

[Bacula-users] upgrade 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, got "The number of files mismatch"

2007-08-17 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
So, What did I do wrong here? I upgraded bacula from 2.0.3 to 2.2.0, FreeBSD 6. Yesterdays nightly job failed big time, each backup failed with 16-Aug 21:46 candyman-sd: Volume "UNW259L2" previously written, moving to end of data. 16-Aug 21:47 candyman-sd: mars.2007-08-16_21.30.02 Error: Bacula

Re: [Bacula-users] Use purged volumes first (before fresh ones)

2007-08-17 Thread Stephan Mueller
* Steen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16.08.2007]: > On Thursday 16 August 2007 21:30:36 Stephan Mueller wrote: > > Hi, > > > > if I remember correctly, in older versions bacula preferred unused > > volumes over purged ones, so that all volumes were used over the time. > > > > I now have switched to an usb