Ok folks i am at my wits end here have been struggliing with this for a couple
of days now it used to work but i made a few minor changes to the conf files
and now bacula is broken.
Please help It must be a minor typo or something but i cannot for the life of
me see it. HELP
Here is the rele
Hi,
i already hit some to the apparently more common errors -
( no ttf font set, no joblog-into-database setting ) and fixed these;
now i'm left with one i really don't know where to fix. at the bweb
status page there
is a field called database size, which unfortunately only shows three
question m
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 05:48:12PM -0700, Angus Jordan wrote:
> The following link provided by MS fixes this (not tested in production,
> yet):
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q838183
>
> I hope this benefits someone else that was looking for this information.
Thanks!
Hello all,
I just came across some information I've been trying to find for awhile now,
so I thought I'd share it.
In Microsoft Windows Small Business Server 2003 the VSS Writer for Exchange
is turned off by default. This is evident in the following log output (note
that the writer is not here!
> -Original Message-
> From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2007 3:13 AM
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: Ilya Volvovski
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Soliciting opinions
>
> On Saturday 07 April 2007 22:56, Ilya Volvovski wrote:
> > Hi,
On Monday 09 April 2007 21:22, Josh Fisher wrote:
>
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Monday 09 April 2007 16:20, Josh Fisher wrote:
> >
> >> There's no reason they cannot use the same pool. They just cannot write
> >> to the same volume concurrently. With a tape device, that would be a
> >> probl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry I'm so late in replying back to this thread, I've had a number of
long-running full backups running on my Bacula 2.0.3 server that I
didn't want to touch until completed. Now that they are done I have some
time to continue investigating this issu
Hristo Benev wrote:
> Job is waiting on Storage File
>
> How long it should take?
>
> Storage file is usb hard drive connected to the server...
>
> What is wrong?
>
> -
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Jo
I backup C:\Document & Settings by bacula. After some time I format
Windows partition by accident. I reinstall Windows and I've tried to
recover buckup.
1. It produce a lot of errors "warning: Permission of xyz was not
changed because file do not exist" or something like that. What's
wrong? Everyth
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 09 April 2007 16:20, Josh Fisher wrote:
>
>> There's no reason they cannot use the same pool. They just cannot write
>> to the same volume concurrently. With a tape device, that would be a
>> problem because there can only be one volume in the tape drive.
>>
I haven't seen the whole thread, so forgive me if I'm off balance
here.
Check the duration of from the beginning of the job to the time of the
failure. If it is consistent, it maybe the same problem I had. There
was a discussion on the list at the time that said to use the heartbeat
function,
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Adam wrote:
> I am using bacula storage and director version 2.0.3 on freebsd 6.1. with
> bacula-fd 2.0.3 on windows 2003 SP2.
[snip]
> The data arrives at the SD, but the windows FD stops sending almost as
> soon as it starts.
With more testing, I see that the size of the dat
On Monday 09 April 2007 18:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In the message dated: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:16:21 +0200,
> The pithy ruminations from Kern Sibbald on
>
> were:
> =>
> =>
> => If you simply want to know what Jobs and Volumes will reach their
expiration
> => date/time, that is somet
>
> This is not true within Bacula. For each Device (tape, DVD, disk, FIFO, ...)
> Bacula has a single file descriptor thus only one Volume can be open for each
> Device, whether tape or disk. Multiple jobs can be simultanously writing to
> that Volume. However, since a Volume can be in only
On Monday 09 April 2007 16:20, Josh Fisher wrote:
> There's no reason they cannot use the same pool. They just cannot write
> to the same volume concurrently. With a tape device, that would be a
> problem because there can only be one volume in the tape drive.
True.
> However
> with a disk d
I'm sorry on this one too, but I am not at all in favor of it, as I have
pointed out a number of times. IMO, Bacula should always retain the full
path to where it found the data, otherwise, it will be total chaos.
In addition, I find the symantics of your propose (for me) confusing. I doubt
I
Item 1: allow bacula to alias one directory path to another
Origin: Mark Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon Apr 9 11:26:31 EDT 2007
Status:
What: Allow bacula to alias one directory path for another.
Why: Snapshots (or other means of copying a directory tree) may appear under
If you simply want to know what Jobs and Volumes will reach their expiration
date/time, that is something that you can do (and I think someone has done
it) with the query.sql file. Predicting purge/prune/recycling is
indeterminate (AFAIK) except at the moment in time.
Consequently, sorry, bu
Item 1: enable bacula to report on purge/prune/recycle actions in the future
Origin: Mark Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon Apr 9 11:26:31 EDT 2007
Status:
What: Enable bacula to produce a report on the purge/prune/recycle actions
that would take place at a speci
Hi, I've just installed Bacula 2.0.3 (build 28.Feb.07) on Win2k SP4. The
file and storage daemons started fine and I can see their monitor icons
on the tray but when I try to connect to the director using either the
wx-console or the bconsole I get an error indicating it couldn't connect
to the dir
There's no reason they cannot use the same pool. They just cannot write
to the same volume concurrently. With a tape device, that would be a
problem because there can only be one volume in the tape drive. However
with a disk device, a volume is a file, so there can be numerous volumes
being wri
I really hate it when this happens. I say the problem looks resolved,
then 3 days later, it happens again.
Backup was again stalled, this time on an NTBackup log file (which I
have now excluded). vssadmin list shadows did not list any VSS shadows.
But this time it was a little different. T
22 matches
Mail list logo
