Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bweb InitCatalog?

2007-03-22 Thread Eric Bollengier
Hi, > I have installed bweb from debian package (2.0.3-1); > for the installation, I followed the notes in the INSTALL file and filled > the > config form shown at first run of bweb.pl. > Now it mostly looks ok, however I have a few questions/notes: > > 1) I think I read somewhere that I should is

[Bacula-users] bweb InitCatalog?

2007-03-22 Thread MaxxAtWork
Hello, I have installed bweb from debian package (2.0.3-1); for the installation, I followed the notes in the INSTALL file and filled the config form shown at first run of bweb.pl. Now it mostly looks ok, however I have a few questions/notes: 1) I think I read somewhere that I should issue an In

[Bacula-users] Errors with VXA-320 jukebox

2007-03-22 Thread Markus Schreier
Hello Bacula experts, i'm using bacula 2.0.1 and experiance problems with an vxa-320 autochanger. Sometimes tapes don't get mounted, sometimes bacula reports i/o-Errors. In the following you find 2 Parts of the bacula-logs: --- start logfile --- 06-Mar 21:12 server02-sd: 3301 Issui

Re: [Bacula-users] "Block checksum mismatch" on restore

2007-03-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 22 March 2007 16:31, Ekkehard Burkon wrote: > Hi, > > Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > > > Two things: > > > > 1. Something seems wrong (possibly with your configuration). By default > > Bacula writes blocks of 64,512 bytes and not 65536 as indicated above on the > > error message. Th

[Bacula-users] Tru64 binaries

2007-03-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Several people have asked for Tru64 binaries, and now we have the following contribution :-) This is contributed code (a Static File daemon). This is static-bacula-fd from 2.0.3 build using GCC 4.1.1 on Tru64 5.1B-4 against ZLib 1.2.3 and OpenSSL 0.9.8d. "It works for me..." It was con

Re: [Bacula-users] backup does nothing

2007-03-22 Thread Jason King
For starters you should do a "stat client" and a "stat director" while the job is running to see if the job is waiting on something like a tape or something. Jerome Massano wrote: > Hello ! > > First, please excuse my bad english. Also excuse me for this is a very > long mail > > I'm all new to

Re: [Bacula-users] Removable disk HOWTO?

2007-03-22 Thread Darien Hager
I think I found one way to attack the "multiple USB backup drives" issue. Mounting NTFS disks to a folder http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/ proddocs/en-us/dm_modify_access_path.mspx Documentation for diskpart command-line tool http://technet2.microsoft.com/Window

Re: [Bacula-users] Removable disk HOWTO?

2007-03-22 Thread Erich Prinz
On Mar 22, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Josh Fisher wrote: > > Erich Prinz wrote: >> True, drives are assigned the next available drive letter. >> >> In many of the simple deployments I have, it is a simple two disk >> rotation. The USB drives always get the same drive mapping - which >> can easily get thr

Re: [Bacula-users] backup does nothing

2007-03-22 Thread Alex Chekholko
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 17:29:09 +0100 "Jerome Massano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello ! > > First, please excuse my bad english. Also excuse me for this is a very long > mail > > I'm all new to bacula. > I installed it yesterday, following the tutorial. Everything worked fine, > and I can backu

Re: [Bacula-users] Removable disk HOWTO?

2007-03-22 Thread Josh Fisher
Erich Prinz wrote: > True, drives are assigned the next available drive letter. > > In many of the simple deployments I have, it is a simple two disk > rotation. The USB drives always get the same drive mapping - which > can easily get thrown out of whack with the introduction of another > d

[Bacula-users] backup does nothing

2007-03-22 Thread Jerome Massano
Hello ! First, please excuse my bad english. Also excuse me for this is a very long mail I'm all new to bacula. I installed it yesterday, following the tutorial. Everything worked fine, and I can backup the source tree of bacula with no problem, and restore it with no problem. I have modified my

Re: [Bacula-users] "Block checksum mismatch" on restore

2007-03-22 Thread Ekkehard Burkon
Hi, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Two things: > > 1. Something seems wrong (possibly with your configuration). By default > Bacula writes blocks of 64,512 bytes and not 65536 as indicated above on the > error message. This makes me wonder. In any case, I don't recommend that > you change the de

Re: [Bacula-users] Need help: Forcing bextract to not rewind the tape before scanning.

2007-03-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 22 March 2007 14:33, Emery Guevremont wrote: > I'm trying to restore data from a tape and I'm getting this error > message at file id 27: > > 21-Mar 16:51 bextract: ERROR TERMINATION at bextract.c:289 > Record header file index 562664 not equal record index 0 > > Now I know there's a

Re: [Bacula-users] wishlist: ldap

2007-03-22 Thread Hans Manz
Dimitri Puzin schrieb: >>> IMHO is the configuration not as much distributed as LDAP was designed >>> for/to pull real benefit from it. The most important configuration is >>> the one from bacula-dir and there is usually only one instance of it >>> running on the network. Another moreless single t

[Bacula-users] Need help: Forcing bextract to not rewind the tape before scanning.

2007-03-22 Thread Emery Guevremont
I'm trying to restore data from a tape and I'm getting this error message at file id 27: 21-Mar 16:51 bextract: ERROR TERMINATION at bextract.c:289 Record header file index 562664 not equal record index 0 Now I know there's a lot more data on this tape. I also used btape to fsf to file 28, and

Re: [Bacula-users] wishlist: ldap

2007-03-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 22 March 2007 13:31, Dimitri Puzin wrote: ... > > > By the way, bacula is a really neat piece of software -- despite of not > > yet beeing complete -- and I've had been glad if bacula at this stage > > existed seven years ago. > Yeah, long time ago I've switched from commercial product

Re: [Bacula-users] wishlist: ldap

2007-03-22 Thread Dimitri Puzin
Hans Manz schrieb: > Dimitri Puzin schrieb: > >>> Of course you could do all that with SQL, but LDAP is >>> optimized for just this purpose. I could elaborate this point, if you wish. >> Please. > > If you don't mind I would postpone this. *ehem* :-) Basically it boils > down to simplicity and pe

Re: [Bacula-users] Debian users - what package?

2007-03-22 Thread MaxxAtWork
On 3/22/07, Kev Latimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My question may have been answered before - what would be the recommended approacjh to installing Bacula on a Debian box? Apt-getting will grab you either 1.36.2, 1.38.11 or 2.0.3, depending on your flavour of Debian (Sarge, Etch, Sid) and ther

Re: [Bacula-users] Debian users - what package?

2007-03-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 22 March 2007 09:54, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 3/22/2007 9:23 AM, Kev Latimer wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've been keeping an eye on Bacula for a number of a years, and I'm now > > in a position to actually go ahead and deploy it - we've just too many > > boxen and too complica

Re: [Bacula-users] Debian users - what package?

2007-03-22 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 3/22/2007 9:23 AM, Kev Latimer wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been keeping an eye on Bacula for a number of a years, and I'm now > in a position to actually go ahead and deploy it - we've just too many > boxen and too complicated a combination of rsync, dump/rdump, tar and > scp, smbclient, and

[Bacula-users] Debian users - what package?

2007-03-22 Thread Kev Latimer
Hi all, I've been keeping an eye on Bacula for a number of a years, and I'm now in a position to actually go ahead and deploy it - we've just too many boxen and too complicated a combination of rsync, dump/rdump, tar and scp, smbclient, and I'm really looking forward to a coherent platform for onc