On Monday 19 March 2007 04:15, Troy Daniels wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Just a quick note to say I've reported the bug as requested.
>
> I haven't forgotten the documentation updates, but am under time constraints
> with a couple of other projects at work currently so haven't had time to
work
> on
Hi again,
Just a quick note to say I've reported the bug as requested.
I haven't forgotten the documentation updates, but am under time constraints
with a couple of other projects at work currently so haven't had time to work
on them yet.
I've also been giving some thought to my planned featur
On 3/18/07, Ralf Prengel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I m looking for a manual to install bacula 2.0 on a Suse 10.2.
>
> Can anyone give me a link.
I take it the official documentation isn't any use to you then?
http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Installing_Bacula.html
--
Hallo,
I m looking for a manual to install bacula 2.0 on a Suse 10.2.
Can anyone give me a link.
Thanks
Ralf Prengel
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get
Eric,
One more strange anomaly ... when I select the file I want, and then pick the
revision I want, then I hit restore and it says "No File To Restore" ... here
is the command line output:
Bvfs::get_all_file_versions:2662SELECT File.JobId, File.FileIndex,
File.Lstat,
File.Md5, Me
On Sunday 18 March 2007 20:27, David Boyes wrote:
> > > I'm a fan of frequent releases. Smaller changes each time is a good
> > > thing. Both from a user and a sysadmin point of view.
>
> In principle this is a great idea. Can I suggest a minor variant?
>
> Frequent releases benefit sites that
> > I'm a fan of frequent releases. Smaller changes each time is a good
> > thing. Both from a user and a sysadmin point of view.
In principle this is a great idea. Can I suggest a minor variant?
Frequent releases benefit sites that are capable of experimentation.
Enterprise deployments don't
As luck would have it, the first email I got while away at a
conference was Bacula telling me the tape was full. No worries. I
reconfigured bacula-dir.conf and changed the JobDefs from:
Storage = DLT
to:
Storage = File
Now that I'm back from the conference, and running on tape
> I discover problem with RunScript directive in version 2.0.2 and now in
> 2.0.3 too.
> I have next directive in Job resource:
> RunScript {
>RunsWhen = After
>RunsOnSuccess = yes
>Command = "/etc/bacula/scripts/disk_check.sh %j"
> }
>
> and the script disk_check.sh is following:
> siz
On Sunday 18 March 2007 18:22, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 18 Mar 2007 at 16:27, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm considering the following ideas for the next couple of Bacula
releases,
> > and would like your ideas.
> >
> > 1. Release version 2.0.4 in the next week or two with a coup
Hello,
Please don't hijack an email message. Your subject is titled "Bacula release
strategy", but the contents has nothing to do with that subject.
Concerning your question: I cannot answer your question because you have
supplied insufficient information, because the text you show for
disk_c
> You can try this version, it fixes some mysql broken stuff
>
> http://bacula.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/bacula/trunk/gui/brestore/brestore.pl?revision=4356
>
> You have to cleanup your database
>
> drop table brestore_missing_path;
> drop table brestore_pathhierarchy;
> drop table bres
On 18 Mar 2007 at 16:27, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm considering the following ideas for the next couple of Bacula releases,
> and would like your ideas.
>
> 1. Release version 2.0.4 in the next week or two with a couple more bug fixes.
>
> 2. Release either version 2.0.5 or more like
Hi Kern and lists,
I discover problem with RunScript directive in version 2.0.2 and now in
2.0.3 too.
I have next directive in Job resource:
RunScript {
RunsWhen = After
RunsOnSuccess = yes
Command = "/etc/bacula/scripts/disk_check.sh %j"
}
and the script disk_check.sh is following:
siz
On Sunday 18 March 2007 17:28, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I'm considering the following ideas for the next couple of Bacula
releases,
> > and would like your ideas.
> >
> > 1. Release version 2.0.4 in the next week or two with a couple more bug
> > fixes.
> >
> > 2. Release either version
> You can try this version, it fixes some mysql broken stuff
>
> http://bacula.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/bacula/trunk/gui/brestore/brestore.pl?revision=4356
>
> You have to cleanup your database
>
> drop table brestore_missing_path;
> drop table brestore_pathhierarchy;
> drop table bres
Hi,
> I'm considering the following ideas for the next couple of Bacula releases,
> and would like your ideas.
>
> 1. Release version 2.0.4 in the next week or two with a couple more bug
> fixes.
>
> 2. Release either version 2.0.5 or more likely version 2.2.0 within 4-8
> weeks, targeting 6 weeks
You can try this version, it fixes some mysql broken stuff
http://bacula.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/bacula/trunk/gui/brestore/brestore.pl?revision=4356
You have to cleanup your database
drop table brestore_missing_path;
drop table brestore_pathhierarchy;
drop table brestore_pathvisib
Hello,
I'm considering the following ideas for the next couple of Bacula releases,
and would like your ideas.
1. Release version 2.0.4 in the next week or two with a couple more bug fixes.
2. Release either version 2.0.5 or more likely version 2.2.0 within 4-8 weeks,
targeting 6 weeks.
Versio
more than 1GB).
>
> --tef
>
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070318 10:18]:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm definitely not an expert on OS configuration, but from what I see
below, I
> > am either misinterpreting the output, or your OS has a conf
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to have restrictions on who can restore certain
machines within my department. The reason for this is because some
machines have sensitive data which should not necessarily fall into the
hands of anybody who can perform a restore. I'm open to any suggestions
you may have.
S 0.3 8.8 103:09.24 mysqld
28746 root 16 0 111m 11m 1348 S 1.7 0.4 127:13.07 bacula-sd
So it is growing and growing.
--tef
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070318 10:18]:
> Hello,
>
> I'm definitely not an expert on OS configuration, but from what I s
I will be giving a Bacula tutorial at BSDCan 2007. The initial
outline is here:
http://www.bsdcan.org/2007/schedule/events/54.en.html
If you have any suggestions for content, please let me know.
--
Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work
my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan
> > Which version of brestore/bacula are you using ?
>
> bacula-2.0.3 and got brestore from bacual-gui of the same version
>
> >> On Saturday 17 March 2007 02:22, Lonny Selinger wrote:
> >> > Still playing around. I managed to get brestore loading etc but I'm
> >> > not sure I'm doing it right. I
On Sunday 18 March 2007 00:07, Mike Seda wrote:
> Right. After the double migration, I verified the job with a small
> restore... Everything seemed fine...
Nice. As I say, I wouldn't expect otherwise. The code that makes the new
backup and that does the restore is code that has existed for a l
Hello,
I'm definitely not an expert on OS configuration, but from what I see below, I
am either misinterpreting the output, or your OS has a configuration problem.
>From what I see from the output of "free", you have 3GB of memory and 6GB of
swap space. That is good.
However, when the kernel ki
26 matches
Mail list logo
