[Bacula-users] Change in verification job tape selection time - deliberate or accidental?

Greetings Listers, Last week I upgraded my Bacula install to 2.0.2 without any issues during the upgrade process. All seemed to be working well until Friday, but that was only because I hadn't discovered this issue yet. I run several jobs each night, with Full backups on Friday night and incr

[Bacula-users] Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64)

Bacula 2.0.3-1 released for SuSE 10.1 and 10.2 (x86_64) - see sourceforge.net rpms-contrib-psheaffer or (soon to be) the sbarnin repo. Thanks, PattiMichelle - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForg

Re: [Bacula-users] On-Site and Off-Site Backup Replicas... Wait For Copy Job?

On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:46:04 +0100 "Mikael Kermorgant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about using mirroring using raid1 ? (you'd probably have to buy > a thirs 200gb). > This way, you achieve data synchronisation easily, always have a > local copy from which to run restores and you cycle between

[Bacula-users] Rif: Re: Change tape problem

Hi Arno, I made some tests and this is what I think. When there is a tape change after an out of space error susequent block write continue to get that error even after the tape change by the robot. This continue. I made some changes to the block.c routine (very simple, because I'm not a C program

Re: [Bacula-users] winbacula 2.0.3 signature alert

Kern Sibbald schrieb: > On Sunday 11 March 2007 17:08, Pierre Bernhardt wrote: >> Hello, Hi, >> >> the signature file don't corrospond to the file: >> >> $ /cygdrive/c/Programme/Internet/GnuPT/GPG/gpg.exe -d >> winbacula-2.0.3.exe.sig gpg: Signature made 03/01/07 10:03:11 using DSA key >> ID 10A792

Re: [Bacula-users] Feature request: more flexible TLS cert validation

Kern Sibbald schrieb: > Hello, Hi, > > Unless I am mistaken, even if there is a duplicate CN as you fear, it seems > to > me it should pose no problems because the certificate would not match. > > Does someone more experienced with TLS know the answer to that? Hmm. I'm not an expert but I've le

Re: [Bacula-users] winbacula 2.0.3 signature alert

On Sunday 11 March 2007 17:08, Pierre Bernhardt wrote: > Hello, > > the signature file don't corrospond to the file: > > $ /cygdrive/c/Programme/Internet/GnuPT/GPG/gpg.exe -d > winbacula-2.0.3.exe.sig gpg: Signature made 03/01/07 10:03:11 using DSA key > ID 10A792AD > gpg: BAD signature from "Bacul

[Bacula-users] winbacula 2.0.3 signature alert

Hello, the signature file don't corrospond to the file: $ /cygdrive/c/Programme/Internet/GnuPT/GPG/gpg.exe -d winbacula-2.0.3.exe.sig gpg: Signature made 03/01/07 10:03:11 using DSA key ID 10A792AD gpg: BAD signature from "Bacula Distribution Verification Key (www.bacula.org)" $ /cygdrive/c/Prog