Re: [Bacula-users] ? Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume

2007-01-26 Thread Peter Eisch
> -Original Message- > From: David Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:26 PM > To: Peter Eisch; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] ? Device is BLOCKED waiting for > mount of volume > > Hi Peter, > > I could be wrong, but

[Bacula-users] MaxWaitTime and MaxStartDelay

2007-01-26 Thread James Harper
Since updating to 2.0.0, MaxWaitTime and MaxStartDelay aren't working for me. The config is: Job { Name = "Nightly" Type = Backup Level = Full Client = ** FileSet = "FullBackup" Messages = Standard Storage = ExternalDisk Pool = Daily Schedule = "Nightly" Max Start Delay = 1

Re: [Bacula-users] DVD+RW vs DVD-RAM for incremental daily backups

2007-01-26 Thread cy tune
On 1/26/07, Arno Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello. Hi > On 1/27/2007 12:23 AM, cy tune wrote: > > Will DVD+R, DVD+RW, and DVD-RAM all work fine when I need multiple disks > > for each task? If a weekly backup needs 3 disks, will that be okay? > > Similarly for the other tasks. > > You

Re: [Bacula-users] DVD+RW vs DVD-RAM for incremental daily backups

2007-01-26 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello. On 1/27/2007 12:23 AM, cy tune wrote: > I have a question about DVD+RW vs. DVD-RAM. I read through the archives > but I didn't see anything comparing DVD+RW vs DVD-RAM. Here's my plan: > > a) DVD+RW or DVD-RAM for incremental daily backups. I am planning on at > least 7 disks so I can

[Bacula-users] DVD+RW vs DVD-RAM for incremental daily backups

2007-01-26 Thread cy tune
I have a question about DVD+RW vs. DVD-RAM. I read through the archives but I didn't see anything comparing DVD+RW vs DVD-RAM. Here's my plan: a) DVD+RW or DVD-RAM for incremental daily backups. I am planning on at least 7 disks so I can extend the lifetime of the media. DVD-RAM would last lo

Re: [Bacula-users] ? Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume

2007-01-26 Thread David Hatcher
Hi Peter, I could be wrong, but I *think* that is the same problem I experienced when I updated to 2.0.1. Once a job began, my autochanger would not load the tape it needed. My solution was to add three lines of code to the /etc/bacula/mtx-changer file on lines 157-159. I added the following.

Re: [Bacula-users] ? Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume

2007-01-26 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, On 1/26/2007 10:24 PM, Peter Eisch wrote: > This is a problem since I moved from 1.38.11 to 2.0.1 that I can't seem to > get past. My changer script works from the command line. The btape 'test' > and 'autochanger' work fine from the command line. If I try to run a job > that uses the au

[Bacula-users] ? Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume

2007-01-26 Thread Peter Eisch
This is a problem since I moved from 1.38.11 to 2.0.1 that I can't seem to get past. My changer script works from the command line. The btape 'test' and 'autochanger' work fine from the command line. If I try to run a job that uses the autochanger it will load the first media and then sit and w

Re: [Bacula-users] fd failing on windows 2003

2007-01-26 Thread Mantas M.
Nod32. Erich Prinz wrote: > What Anti Virus package are you using? > > E > - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT &

Re: [Bacula-users] fd failing on windows 2003

2007-01-26 Thread Erich Prinz
What Anti Virus package are you using? E On Jan 26, 2007, at 4:15 AM, Mantas M. wrote: > I had bacula running in trace mode with debug set to 200. For > brevity's sake i've stripped the > > klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:506 Send data to SD len=* > > lines from the trace. > > Please see attach

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 2.0 on Ubuntu

2007-01-26 Thread expert71
It might help to know the errors you are getting. following are the files I downloaded: $ ls -1 bacula_2.0.0-1_all.deb bacula-client_2.0.0-1_all.deb bacula-common_2.0.0-1_all.deb bacula-console_2.0.0-1_i386.deb bacula-director-common_2.0.0-1_i386.deb bacula-director-mysql_2.0.0-1_i386.deb bacul

Re: [Bacula-users] no respose when spooling attributes

2007-01-26 Thread Dan Langille
On 26 Jan 2007 at 15:00, Dan Langille wrote: > We're doing a large backup (1.5 million files). We have Spool > Attributes = Yes. I suspect it is spooling the attributes now and > has been doing so for a few hours. > > Is "status client" expected to work during the spooling of > attributes?

[Bacula-users] no respose when spooling attributes

2007-01-26 Thread Dan Langille
We're doing a large backup (1.5 million files). We have Spool Attributes = Yes. I suspect it is spooling the attributes now and has been doing so for a few hours. Is "status client" expected to work during the spooling of attributes? I ask because we wanted an hour or so for a reply. In fac

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 2.0 on Ubuntu

2007-01-26 Thread Dan Langille
On 26 Jan 2007 at 11:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to install bacula 2.0 on Ubuntu Edty Eft machine. I read > in the 2.0 announcement that Bacula 2.0 release is available for > Ubuntu. I downloaded the latest release 2.0.1 .deb files from > SourceForge, and tried ins

[Bacula-users] bacula 2.0 on Ubuntu

2007-01-26 Thread expert71
Hello, I am trying to install bacula 2.0 on Ubuntu Edty Eft machine. I read in the 2.0 announcement that Bacula 2.0 release is available for Ubuntu. I downloaded the latest release 2.0.1 .deb files from SourceForge, and tried installing. I get dependency errors when I try to install. Ar

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2k Automated Upgrade from 1.3x to 2.0

2007-01-26 Thread Robert Nelson
Those messages come from the 1.3x Bacula-fd.exe. The new version doesn't display them. But during an upgrade the old one is used to uninstall the existing service. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mantas M. Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 1

[Bacula-users] Possible missing SD Device resource configuration options

2007-01-26 Thread Josh Endries
Hi all, I just upgraded to 2.0 and have been going through my configuration files (converting to per-client Devices). I noticed a couple definitions in my old 1.38 Device {} sections that are not mentioned in the manual. The first is Automatic Mount, is this still valid (was it ever? am I craz

Re: [Bacula-users] Magic "don't descend into this directory"-files

2007-01-26 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 26 January 2007 17:27, Ian Levesque wrote: > I use a simple technique - my client configurations have an exclude > statement for "*.nobackup". If a user doesn't want to back up a > directory, he can rename the directory with a .nobackup 'extension'. > This is easier for a user to see and

Re: [Bacula-users] Magic "don't descend into this directory"-files

2007-01-26 Thread Davide Bolcioni
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 7:08 pm, Per Andreas Buer wrote: > I've finally put my Bacula system into production and I am really happy > about how things are going. There is one feature from Arkeia which I am > missing; in Arkeia you could create a empty file in a folder and Arkeia > would not d

Re: [Bacula-users] Magic "don't descend into this directory"-files

2007-01-26 Thread Ian Levesque
I use a simple technique - my client configurations have an exclude statement for "*.nobackup". If a user doesn't want to back up a directory, he can rename the directory with a .nobackup 'extension'. This is easier for a user to see and it's quite obvious later when he adds additional file

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2k Automated Upgrade from 1.3x to 2.0

2007-01-26 Thread Mantas M.
Thanks, Michel that explains why the message is shown regardless of the /S switch. It's sad, though, that this issue was overlooked, as it is a real bug for those, who use bacula in large windows based environments. Mantas. Michel Meyers wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2k Automated Upgrade from 1.3x to 2.0

2007-01-26 Thread Michel Meyers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mantas M. wrote: > I've been looking for a way to automate the setup on xp workstations as > well. After some fifteen tries to install and uninstall bacula in > various ways i've decided to go the with the merest: > > 1. stop the service > 2. replace t

Re: [Bacula-users] Win2k Automated Upgrade from 1.3x to 2.0

2007-01-26 Thread Mantas M.
I've been looking for a way to automate the setup on xp workstations as well. After some fifteen tries to install and uninstall bacula in various ways i've decided to go the with the merest: 1. stop the service 2. replace the binary files 3. start the service again. as far as i've tested this,