I'm using bacula-1.38.10 on a Dell SC430 running CentOS 4.4. The
system has a DAT-72 drive that has been working fine. Recently, the
backups have increased beyond our initial expectations. It appears
that hardware compression is disabled (or not available), since the
volume ("SAT004") th
On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Deric Abel wrote:
Hello all, Two questions -:
1. Is the tape encryption all or nothing, or is it possible to
pick and
choose what files/directories are or are not? If so, how?
The file daemon encryption is all-or-nothing.
2. If a disaster occurred and al
Hi,
On 10/21/2006 4:15 AM, John Felczak wrote:
> Bacula 1.36.3 on Fedora Core 4
Consider upgrading to 1.38. It has some enhancements, and it is much
more likely to get qualified support as many list users dropped 1.36
quite a while ago...
> Exabyte VXA Packetloader 1x10 1U
>
> Bacula seems a
HP and several other vendors have always had somewhat non-standard Unix
implementations. They probably need an additional library, which you
might find in their documentation of libwrap. If so, just add it to the
LIBS environment variably before doing ./configure as documented in the
installation
Hello,
Yes, HP-UX probably won't be the easest, but then maybe you will pull out
a few more wierdo Makefile bugs.
First, please switch over to bacula-devel list since this is really a
development topic.
The problem you are seeing with sqlite initalization can simply be
ignored. It is fixed in th
Hi,
we are looking into replacing our existing backup solution, with Bacula
being one of the contenders. I have been experimenting a bit with both
the stable (1.38.11) and beta (1.39.26) series, and I must say I am
quite impressed with Bacula! However, some open questions still remain..
1) T
