On Saturday 02 September 2006 05:54, Scott Simpson wrote:
> Which version of bacula would be good if I'm using a DVD drive? I can check
> out from CVS too. (I currently am in fact). Should I wait for 1.40? Thanks.
I recommend waiting for a couple of days, then checking out the CVS or use the
nex
Which version of bacula would be good if I'm using a DVD drive? I can check
out from CVS too. (I currently am in fact). Should I wait for 1.40? Thanks.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, securit
On Saturday 02 September 2006 00:20, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Unless I hear back from you otherwise, I am considering that there is no
need
> > to add this to the list of projects.
>
> I'm totally aware of the Verify feature and yes it accomplishes the same
> task. But in or
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 22:41 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 9/1/2006 7:33 PM, Peter Sjoberg wrote:
> > I wonder if it's anything I can do to improve the performance when
> > inserting the attributes.
> >
> > I'm backing up several servers but one specifically is about 86Gb data
> > and
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Unless I hear back from you otherwise, I am considering that there is no need
> to add this to the list of projects.
I'm totally aware of the Verify feature and yes it accomplishes the same
task. But in order for me to "try to" detect a silent data corruption
with the verify
Hi,
I forgot to mention that this works with MySQL and is not exactly tuned
for anything. It just did what I thought you wanted when I tried it here.
Arno
On 9/1/2006 10:48 PM, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/1/2006 10:19 PM, Maria McKinley wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I couldn't find anything i
On Friday 01 September 2006 22:15, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/1/2006 1:40 PM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I was wondering about the best way to tell bacula that volumes not
> > present in the changer are not to be recycled / used to avoid operator
> > intervention. We stor
Hi,
On 9/1/2006 10:19 PM, Maria McKinley wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I couldn't find anything in the documentation, so thought I'd ask. Is
> there anyway to get bacula to list the volumes in a pool in order of
> date LastWritten instead of MediaID?
Add the following to your query.sql:
# 21
:List Medi
Hello,
On 9/1/2006 7:33 PM, Peter Sjoberg wrote:
> I wonder if it's anything I can do to improve the performance when
> inserting the attributes.
>
> I'm backing up several servers but one specifically is about 86Gb data
> and 1.6Million files. The data backup finish after a few hours (<6) but
>
Hello,
I couldn't find anything in the documentation, so thought I'd ask. Is
there anyway to get bacula to list the volumes in a pool in order of
date LastWritten instead of MediaID?
thanks a bunch,
Maria
-
Using Tomcat bu
Hello,
On 9/1/2006 3:26 PM, Frederik wrote:
> Hi, could the following messages be a sign of a bad tape, or would
> this have another cause?
Yes.
;-)
> 01-Sep 03:05 server-sd: Recycled volume "donderdag" on device "tape"
> (/dev/st0), all previous data lost.
> 01-Sep 05:19 server-sd: End of Volum
Hi,
On 9/1/2006 1:40 PM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I was wondering about the best way to tell bacula that volumes not
> present in the changer are not to be recycled / used to avoid operator
> intervention. We store some tapes (usually 3 out of 8) off-site, but
> those volume records
On Friday 01 September 2006 19:33, Peter Sjoberg wrote:
> I wonder if it's anything I can do to improve the performance when
> inserting the attributes.
>
> I'm backing up several servers but one specifically is about 86Gb data
> and 1.6Million files. The data backup finish after a few hours (<6)
On Friday 01 September 2006 19:12, Philip Gleghorn wrote:
> I tested again and both differential and incremental jobs are always
> pruned correctly according to retention periods, but not full jobs. I
> tried winding the system clock forwards a couple of years just in case,
> but it made no diff
I wonder if it's anything I can do to improve the performance when
inserting the attributes.
I'm backing up several servers but one specifically is about 86Gb data
and 1.6Million files. The data backup finish after a few hours (<6) but
then it (I assume) updates the database with all the attribute
I tested again and both differential and incremental jobs are always
pruned correctly according to retention periods, but not full jobs. I
tried winding the system clock forwards a couple of years just in case,
but it made no difference. It seems like this is a bug, the
documentation doesn't me
Hello,
I believe, if I understand your request, that this feature already exists.
It works a bit differently from what you suggest, but it also gives you a lot
more control. It is called Verify. First you run a Verify job with your
FileSet -- normally it will not be the same as your backup Fi
Item 1: Automatically detection of silent data corruption
Date: 1. september 2006
Origin: Jesper Krogh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status: Unimplemented.
What: Detect silent data-corruption automatically.
When a full backup are performed there is (when configured so)
put
Excellent,Today I will backup all of my server to my SATA Storage.If you have success with this autochanger, I will buy one.[]'s2006/9/1, Vicente Hernandez <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:Hello Marcos,
We will try to make it works next week. We havethe same model with 3 LTO3 drives.Vicente HernándezAt 15:42
Hello Marcos,
We will try to make it works next week. We have
the same model with 3 LTO3 drives.
Vicente Hernández
At 15:42 01/09/2006, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm buying a autochanger to my company I saw
>that bacula supports Dell Power Vault 136T but
>Dell will discontinue this changer.
>
>A
Hello,I'm buying a autochanger to my company I saw that bacula supports Dell Power Vault 136T but Dell will discontinue this changer.And Dell offers to me this model:ML6020 with 3 lto3 drivers
This model is the same as: Adic Scalar i500Bacula work with this autochanger ?[]'sMarcos Dias
---
Hi, could the following messages be a sign of a bad tape, or would
this have another cause?
01-Sep 03:05 server-sd: Recycled volume "donderdag" on device "tape"
(/dev/st0), all previous data lost.
01-Sep 05:19 server-sd: End of Volume "donderdag" at 3:6763 on device
"tape" (/dev/st0). Write of 645
Hi all,
I updated the Oracle 10g Release 2 section of the
Application Specific Backups page in the unofficial
Bacula wiki. The (sort of) changelog goes below:
- cp proved unreliable in my site at times, replaced
it with rsync and did several succesful restores
You can see it in
http://paramount.i
You define the e-mail address and what is to be sent in a Messages{} section in
the file "bacula-dir.conf".
Example:
Messages {
Name = Standard
mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = all, !skipped, !terminate
operator = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = mount
console = all, !skipped, !saved
}
With the above examp
Hi all
I have bacula.1.38.10 running on FC3, doing disk backup and more
recently in a DAT-72 tape. I have had some problems when the tapes
filled, because bacula don't notify that i have to change the tape. I
have do use bconsole and see the "messages" to know when i have to
change my tape..exi
Hi folks,
I was wondering about the best way to tell bacula that volumes not
present in the changer are not to be recycled / used to avoid operator
intervention. We store some tapes (usually 3 out of 8) off-site, but
those volume records will remain in the database, so when the time
comes for bacu
Hi there,
Im looking for some help with a particular bacula problem Im having, any
advice is greatly appreciated...
Im using Bacula 1.36.2 with a Debian Sarge (kernel 2.6.8) director and
a CentOS 4 (kernel 2.6.9) client.
Im trying to exclude certain sub-directories from a backup job. Ive
con
Alan Brown wrote:
> Sqlite is NOT a production quality database and should NOT be used in a
> production backup system. It is only included for testing purposes.
sqlite may not compete with a true DBMS but there isn't a performance issue
with sqlite2 in small environments like mine.
And it has t
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Marco wrote:
> Just an idea:
>
> I did not build v1.38.11 and v1.38.8 myself but installed the debian
> packages. During the downgrade I noticed that there were changes concerning
> sqlite and sqlite3.
Sqlite is NOT a production quality database and should NOT be used in a
pr
On Friday 01 September 2006 10:13, Arunav Mandal wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 August 2006 09:20, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 8/28/2006 10:55 PM, Arunav Mandal wrote:
> > > I tried to compile bacula from source in suse 7 machine and it failed.
> > > Below I gave the error message.
> > >
> > >
Hi,
On 9/1/2006 10:13 AM, Arunav Mandal wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 August 2006 09:20, Arno Lehmann wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>On 8/28/2006 10:55 PM, Arunav Mandal wrote:
>>
>>>I tried to compile bacula from source in suse 7 machine and it failed.
>>>Below I gave the error message.
...
>
> I am attaching th
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 09:20, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 8/28/2006 10:55 PM, Arunav Mandal wrote:
> > I tried to compile bacula from source in suse 7 machine and it failed.
> > Below I gave the error message.
> >
> > == Error in /root/bacula-1.38.11/src/lib ==
> >
> >
> > ==>Ente
32 matches
Mail list logo
