> On Tuesday 20 June 2006 06:47, Christopher wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am running fedora core 5 and after creating the recovery cd, when I go
>> to test it on another computer ( I do not want to test it on the actual
>> server that I have backed up till I know it works) I am unable to
>> actu
On Saturday 24 June 2006 12:11, Robert Nelson wrote:
> I can't remember exactly what the signatures in the catalog are used for.
> Is it just verification of files on tape and to monitor which files on the
> disk might have changed? If that is the case then I don't see any reason
> for the Old opt
I can't remember exactly what the signatures in the catalog are used for.
Is it just verification of files on tape and to monitor which files on the
disk might have changed? If that is the case then I don't see any reason
for the Old option either.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROT
On Saturday 24 June 2006 10:57, Robert Nelson wrote:
> Why not have a configuration option like HashVersion or HashCompatibility
> or something that can be three values corresponding to Old, Transition,
> New?
>
> Old
> Behaves exactly as it does today and is the default for upgrades.
>
> Tra
Why not have a configuration option like HashVersion or HashCompatibility or
something that can be three values corresponding to Old, Transition, New?
Old
Behaves exactly as it does today and is the default for upgrades.
Transition
Writes the DB using the new hash and attemp
Am Fri, 23 Jun 2006 17:17:27 +0100 (BST) schrieb Alan Brown
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Christoff Buch wrote:
>
>> Might I add a few lines I've already added to Rumkos original mail
>> before?:
>>
>> Spooling is very good, but shouldn't slow down backup since this affects
>> per-n
Hello,
Along the lines of protocol versioning and daemon compatibility (I'm sort of
hijacking your thread Joshua ...), there is a *BIG* issue coming up for
version 1.40.0 (when 1.39.x is released), and that is the compatibility of
the Bacula binary base64 routines.
When I wrote the base64 rout