- Original Message -
From: Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, May 19, 2006 5:47 pm
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris static-fd
> > On Fri, 19 May 2006 15:11:06 -0400, Ryan Novosielski
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > Is there still no way to build a static fd on So
As part of the port
of the storage daemon to Windows, I've ported the mtx package. I've tested
tapeinfo against my tape drive. Unfortunately I don't have any changer
devices with which to test it. If you would like to volunteer to test mtx
and tapeinfo please send an email directly to me.
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there still no way to build a static fd on Solaris? I need this for a
rescue disc for Solaris 9. I know Robert Hartzell has done it with 10 --
don't know if something changed between 9 and 10.
Any info from anyone? Here's
Am Freitag, 19. Mai 2006 12:17 schrieb Greg Foster:
>
> Yes, same issue here. Grabbed the 1.38.9 source from SF, compiled
> it, and now the Autochanger stanza doesn't make bacula-sd die.
>
> Greg.
Hi!
Someone opend already a bugreport at debian.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
> On Fri, 19 May 2006 15:11:06 -0400, Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> Is there still no way to build a static fd on Solaris? I need this for a
> rescue disc for Solaris 9. I know Robert Hartzell has done it with 10 --
> don't know if something changed between 9 and 10.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there still no way to build a static fd on Solaris? I need this for a
rescue disc for Solaris 9. I know Robert Hartzell has done it with 10 --
don't know if something changed between 9 and 10.
Any info from anyone? Here's the failure:
/usr/local/b
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 10:35:02PM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Softwarwe that claims to know exactly how much tape space is left
> usually lies, or, expressed differently, estimates. By the way: I wrote
> a small perl program to estimate available tape space, based on how much
> data is stored
Hello,
On 5/19/2006 9:59 PM, Georger Araujo wrote:
Sure, but a tape has a fixed number of blocks;
Unfortunately, not.
I think
it would be possible to know how many of them are used
and how many are left?
The compression rate isn't the most important factor -
say you have a 200 GB tape divide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You can't really tell how much free space there is, because you can't
really tell how well the data you're going to write will compress.
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III
|$&| |__| |
Sure, but a tape has a fixed number of blocks; I think
it would be possible to know how many of them are used
and how many are left?
The compression rate isn't the most important factor -
say you have a 200 GB tape divided in 200 blocks, each
1 GB in size (insane, yeah). If Bacula wrote up to the
1
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Matthias Kurz wrote:
I don't think so, because of my understanding on physics, the stress to
material is higher when the temperature is changing, than at a constant
level. spinning up an down would mean that during backup the temperature
of the drives are rising to go down a
On Fri, 19 May 2006, Meidal, Knut wrote:
The problem would be that there is no way to start rewriting a tape, and
then "stop" before you overwrite the important data at the end without
destroying that, too.
The only way out of that would be to come up with a "tape reclaim" feature
where you read
Hello,
I'm trying to set "Reschedule On Error" up.
I've tried the following:
Created a job to backup a client which is NOT connected.
I would expect the job would be rescheduled until the client get connected.
I understand the following timeout values are low, but the are just for
test purposes.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005, Daniel Weuthen wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2005, Daniel Weuthen wrote:
> > > [..]
> > >
> > > > Now, it would be nice if it would be possible to spin down the disks
> > > > after usage.
> > >
> > > I don't think so, because of my understanding on physics, the stress to
> >
The problem would be that there is no way to start
rewriting a tape, and then "stop" before you overwrite the important data at the
end without destroying that, too.
The only way out of that would be to come up with a "tape
reclaim" feature where you read the important data off the vo
Martin:
Thanks... I am planning on doing the upgrade within the next 30 days. Restarting the storage daemon solved the problem. AmbexOn 5/19/06,
Martin Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 11:00:27 -0500, "Ambahunen Gebremariam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:>> Hey All:>> I acc
Would it be too difficult to make it possible? I think it would be a great feature.. We'd use all the tape space2006/5/19, Frank Sweetser <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:42:12AM -0300, Diogo Melo wrote:
> -When it's 02/26/2006, the first and the second job will be expired, a
> On Wed, 17 May 2006 11:00:27 -0500, "Ambahunen Gebremariam" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Hey All:
>
> I accidently unmounted a file storage that contains multiple volumes from
> the console and now I cannot mount it back.
>
> *mount storage=KY-file
> 3901 open device failed: ERR=Co
This is what you said Mark McCracken
> Hi guys -
>
> I'm new to bacula, but I've been reading the docs and trying different
> things to accomplish my goal here, and I'm stumped. Maybe you can help
> me.
> I have 6 machines on my home network that I want to backup, all to a large
> drive mounted at
I'm seeing what seems to be a similar error message to what Dominic
Marks reported earlier this month. Director is running on a SGI Irix
machine (Irix 6.5.3), bacula version 1.38.6. File daemon is running on a
FreeBSD 5 machine, Bacula 1.38.9. Here is the error output:
19-May 16:34 ziggy-dir:
Hello all,
In the Bacula manual, one suggestion for daily tape rotation is to use a
different pool for each day. That sounds excessively complex to me. We
want to do daily rotations to offsite storage, though.
I thought of a couple of options.
One is to just remove each day's tape from the cha
Hi,
the tape that I mount has volstatus Append.
Of course I can restart the bacula daemon and run the backup by hand, but
then I loose the list of backup jobs which are waiting for this one to
complete.
best regards
Marcin
- Original Message -
From: "Stefan MARTEL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:42:12AM -0300, Diogo Melo wrote:
> -When it's 02/26/2006, the first and the second job will be expired, and
> I don't know if bacula permits me to use this 390GB that could be avaliable
> on this tape even before the expiration of the third job?
No, it will not. Bac
Hello, I've been using bacula 1.38.0 with success, but I'm wondering if the situation that I'll try to describe is possible:- Let's assume a 400GB tape with 3 jobs stored and each one has a different retention time.
Start date: 02/10/2006 - 1º job: 300GB size, expiration time: 5 days - 2
There's wx-console for Windows, but it's not
user-friendly.
Georger
--- Alejandro Alfonso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu:
> There isn't a graphical tool for bacula
> administration at this moment,
> and nothing seems will be one in the near future
>
> Otherwise, bconsole can be run from MS Window
There isn't a graphical tool for bacula administration at this moment,
and nothing seems will be one in the near future
Otherwise, bconsole can be run from MS Windows, but command line and
administrative password must be use
Best regards!
We are evaluating Bacula as a replacement for our
out
Hi,
I've been using Bacula for 3 days now, and it works
great. Thanks to all the devs.
I have an LTO-2 (200/400 GB) tape drive, and I need to
backup around 43 GB of data from Monday to Friday. I
bought five tapes, and I intend to set up five pools:
Mon, Tue, Wed, Thu, and Fri. Each tape will be use
Hi there.
I have allready dig in archive but mayby i don't understand english well
enough to make it working.
My config file looks like pasting here but every section from Client to bottom
is duplicate for every host in lan. It has different addres password and ip.
When I have Maximum Conc
On 5/19/06, Marcus Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Freitag, 19. Mai 2006 10:25 schrieb Arno Lehmann:
> Hello,
>
> On 5/16/2006 7:17 AM, Marcus Meyer wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I'm using Debian testing/unstable with bacula version 1.38.9.
>
> Which architecture? 64bits perhaps? In that case, tr
It happens for a particular client when I am doing a full backup after 29Gb or
so it fails. At first I spool to disk then to tape. The error is given below.
19-May 11:39 e-fd: backup-e.2006-05-19_08.14.44 Fatal error: backup.c:477
Network send error 32768 to SD. ERR=Broken pipe
19-May 11:39 tr
Am Freitag, 19. Mai 2006 10:25 schrieb Arno Lehmann:
> Hello,
>
> On 5/16/2006 7:17 AM, Marcus Meyer wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I'm using Debian testing/unstable with bacula version 1.38.9.
>
> Which architecture? 64bits perhaps? In that case, try compiling with -O0
> (oh zero) to disable optimizati
Hello,
On 5/16/2006 7:17 AM, Marcus Meyer wrote:
Hello!
I'm using Debian testing/unstable with bacula version 1.38.9.
Which architecture? 64bits perhaps? In that case, try compiling with -O0
(oh zero) to disable optimization. There seems to be a problem there.
There's also a report that def
I sent this mail yesterday to the devel-list... maybe there are
more people on the users-list and there will be more success on it :-)))
christian
--
>
> Hi,
>
> has anybody done an implementation of the communication-protocol
> (between director and console) in java?
>
> thanks a lot,
> chr
Hello Robert,
I've added this lines to my bacula-dir.conf and the problem is fixed.
Thanks.
Florian
> In the file /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf add the following lines to the
> Console resource at the end of the file after the line "CommandACL = status,
> .status".
>
> CatalogACL = *all*
> JobACL
34 matches
Mail list logo
