... and I resolved it by including "Autochanger = yes" in the Storage resource in the Director configuration file. On 4/12/06, daemonicpenguin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm experiencing the same problem with a Dell PV122T on RHEL 3.--View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Label-comma
Hi Joshua,
The spec file would be great.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by "The client code is in with the
rest". I couldn't find any 1.36.3 rpm files on the bacula sourceforge
site. The link to the older files seems to be broken. If I can't
find a src rpm I'll just grab the source, but I wa
I'm experiencing the same problem with a Dell PV122T on RHEL 3.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Label-command-not-asking-for-slot-number-t106202.html#a3893788
Sent from the Bacula - Users forum at Nabble.com.
---
This
Hi Martin,
On Apr 12, 2006, at 6:11 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
Since you have a multi-CPU server, what kind of CPU utilization is
50% (the
whole machine or one of the daemon processes)?
I've only ever seen bacula take advantage of one CPU; typically I see
50% utilized on one CPU.
Wha
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 13:53, Eric Peterson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I need to install bacula-fd on my CentOS 4.3 x86_64 clients so I was
> hoping I could find a src rpm for 1.36.3 so I could build it for my
> platform.
The client code is in with the rest. I just built RPMs for CentOS 4.3,
albeit
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
I am more and more convinced that this is a subtel timing issue in
the SCSI tape driver layer.
Do you think it could be an overrun situation?
Overrun of what?
Sorry, nothing. Not thinking clear enough. Late hours here. Should
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > I am more and more convinced that this is a subtel timing issue in
> > the SCSI tape driver layer.
>
> Do you think it could be an overrun situation?
Overrun of what?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtim
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:42:25 -0400, Ian Levesque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been trying to optimize the backup speed of my bacula
> installation. My full backups, no spooling, max out at around 12-13MB/
> s per client, where I think I should be seeing over 40MB/s. It
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
My last hypothesis is that it is due to using h/w compression. After I've
changed back to s/w compression I have not seen this phenomenon. When that said,
No, h/w vs. s/w compression is only indirectly involved. It changes
the
Hello,
I need to install bacula-fd on my CentOS 4.3 x86_64 clients so I was
hoping I could find a src rpm for 1.36.3 so I could build it for my
platform.
Anyone?
Thanks,
Eric
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking script
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 06:09, Greg Wilson wrote:
> Kern,
>
>
>
> Bacula is a great product and working well backing up my Postfix email
> system on Debian.
>
>
>
> The one and only problem I have with it is that I can't get it to fit my
> standard tape regime.
>
>
>
> We use a child, father, gr
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:30:07 -0400, Emery Guevremont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> Martin Simmons wrote:
> >> On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 10:43:30 -0400, Emery Guevremont <[EMAIL
> >> PROTECTED]> said:
> >> I have a weird problem. I'm trying to restore some files from a tape
> >> ba
Hi Eric,
On Apr 12, 2006, at 4:41 PM, Eric Warnke wrote:
Are you using compression on the fileset? SHA1 signatures? That
can really bog down the director. When I dumped compression ( the
LTO drives we are using are quite capable ) + spooling our backup
speed jumped to 40MB/sec ( about th
Leonardo dos Santos Goldim wrote:
hy,
i was doing more tests and found this:
* my problem isn't with more than one client, is with more than one
storage.
I am currently experiencing the same problem. I have 3 different
storage devices. When I initiate a restore it always uses the def
Hi all,
I've been trying to optimize the backup speed of my bacula
installation. My full backups, no spooling, max out at around 12-13MB/
s per client, where I think I should be seeing over 40MB/s. It
doesn't appear to affect the speed of per-client backups when more
than one client is run
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> My last hypothesis is that it is due to using h/w compression. After I've
> changed back to s/w compression I have not seen this phenomenon. When that
> said,
No, h/w vs. s/w compression is only indirectly involved. It changes
the timing. With
hy,
i was doing more tests and found this:
* my problem isn't with more than one client, is with more than one
storage.
i made some changes on my bacula conf, i created one storage for each
client:
-> bacula-dir.conf
Director { # define myself
Name = smart09-dir
here are my *.conf:
-> bacula-dir.conf
Director { # define myself
Name = smart09-dir
DIRport = 9101 # where we listen for UA connections
DirAddress = 10.0.0.151
QueryFile = "/etc/bacula/query.sql"
WorkingDirectory = "/var/bacula/working"
Pi
Martin Simmons wrote:
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 10:43:30 -0400, Emery Guevremont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
I have a weird problem. I'm trying to restore some files from a tape
backup taken a few months ago.
The problem is that the files aren't on the tape. If I use the query
command in bconsole to
Well, if they are all the same age and have been written to roughly an
equal number of times, that might be a possibility. I have had a few go at
around the same time (not simultaneously, but within a week or so of each
other).
I would have a little bit of trouble believing that HW compression
That was one thing I did think of and I did put in a cleaning tape and
ran it through. Will see if that clears it up.
I have trouble believing that 3-4 tapes were bad or corrupt all at once
so not sure that's the problem but I suppose stranger things have happened.
Deann
Ryan Novosielski wrote
I haven't tried that, but I will. If I can determine that this solves
the problem I'll report back to the list.
Thanks!
Deann
Diogo Melo wrote:
Have you tried to use the command "mt -f /dev/st0 erase" ? I think
this will ensure that all data of the tape has been erased, including
the eof ma
Have you tried to use the command "mt -f /dev/st0 erase" ? I think this will ensure that all data of the tape has been erased, including the eof marks.2006/4/12, Erik P. Olsen <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:Ryan Novosielski wrote:> Sounds to me like the media are going bad or your drive is dirty. Clean
> you
Ryan Novosielski wrote:
Sounds to me like the media are going bad or your drive is dirty. Clean
your drive and possibly try a brand new tape.
Probably not. I have had the same experience with brand new tapes and a cleaned
tape drive. See thread: When is a tape "Full"?).
My last hypothesis is
Am 10.04.2006 um 21:08 schrieb Bill Moran:Well. I'm having some problems and I hope you can help me. configuresucceeds, although I used a slightly different set of options:./configure \--enable-smartalloc \--sbindir=/usr/sbin \--with-pid-dir=/var/run \--with-subsys-dir=/var/run/subsys \--with-wor
Sounds to me like the media are going bad or your drive is dirty. Clean
your drive and possibly try a brand new tape.
deann corum wrote:
> We're using Bacula 1.36.3 (yea, I know - old) on CentOS 3 (yea, I know
> - old) with AIT3 tapes (which store about 150 GB each) in an 8-tape
> changer (Sony S
26 matches
Mail list logo
