Re: [Bacula-users] Looking for a suggestion.

2005-11-19 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
Quoting AltGrendel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm running 1.38.1 on RedHat under a 2.6.14 kernel using (among other > things) a VLS DLT400. During the boot process I need to run "mtx -f > /dev/sg4 inventory" so the system knows what slots are loaded. Should > this be inserted into the bacula-dir sta

[Bacula-users] Looking for a suggestion.

2005-11-19 Thread AltGrendel
I'm running 1.38.1 on RedHat under a 2.6.14 kernel using (among other things) a VLS DLT400. During the boot process I need to run "mtx -f /dev/sg4 inventory" so the system knows what slots are loaded. Should this be inserted into the bacula-dir startup or the rc.local file? --

Re: [Bacula-users] Re: CentOS 4

2005-11-19 Thread Craig White
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 12:08 +0100, Felix Schwarz wrote: > Craig White wrote: > > Looking to install on CentOS 4 > > I see 1.38.0-1 rpms for RHEL 3 and other rh/fc versions. > > > > Should I just install 1.31 from tarball or get source rpm and rebuild? > > I built CentOS 4 RPMs with TLS and Python

Re: [Bacula-users] question about storage daemon

2005-11-19 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, On 19.11.2005 22:15, Kern Sibbald wrote: On Wednesday 16 November 2005 15:05, Federico Ciceri wrote: Hi my name is Federico and I have only 1 question. Can the storage daemon be executed under win2kserver? (We have a tape unit on a pc that runs win2k) No, not without an *enormous*

Re: [Bacula-users] question about storage daemon

2005-11-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 15:05, Federico Ciceri wrote: > Hi my name is Federico and I have only 1 question. > > Can the storage daemon be executed under win2kserver? (We have a tape > unit on a pc that runs win2k) No, not without an *enormous* amount of programming effort. > > Thank you > >

Re: [Bacula-users] smartalloc errors

2005-11-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
This looks to me like it is a bug in the code (new to 1.38 I think) that saves the finder info. Could you please submit this as a bug report to bugs.bacula.org ? This will ensure that it gets looked at and fixed. On Wednesday 16 November 2005 02:46, Troy Stanger wrote: > I am using a custom c

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore uses only first Storage defined?

2005-11-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
Please give each of your File storage devices a different Media Type. Restore keys on Media Type to find the correct Storage device. On Monday 14 November 2005 17:08, Willard Korfhage wrote: > I'm having trouble getting a backup to restore, and was wondering if > someone can tell me where I am go

[Bacula-users] Re: CentOS 4

2005-11-19 Thread Felix Schwarz
Craig White wrote: Looking to install on CentOS 4 I see 1.38.0-1 rpms for RHEL 3 and other rh/fc versions. Should I just install 1.31 from tarball or get source rpm and rebuild? I built CentOS 4 RPMs with TLS and Python support which are working fine although I did not have the time to rebuil

[Bacula-users] Windows EFS

2005-11-19 Thread Marco
Hi, bacula backups files encrypted by EFS as empty 0 byte files. Is there a solution for this issue? Regards, Marco --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certific

[Bacula-users] Compatibility Bacula ->Tandberg StorageLoader LTO2

2005-11-19 Thread frank . stuber
Hello, thank's to Kern an all the other's for such a good software. I have searched for about 2 or 3 years before I found Bacula. And now we are happy with it. We now replace our existing Backup Exec with Bacula. Last fife months I have testet Bacula 1.36 at Suse Linux 9.3 with an HP 40x6 and

[Bacula-users] RE: [Bacula-devel] Re: Feature Requests

2005-11-19 Thread David Boyes
> > Item 1: "spool-only" backup > >Origin: Frank Volf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >Date: 17 november 2005 > >Status: This is another variation of the pool-to-pool migration idea. If a disk pool were available as the first pool in the migratino chain, then this feature request would be s

[Bacula-users] question about storage daemon

2005-11-19 Thread Federico Ciceri
Hi my name is Federico and I have only 1 question. Can the storage daemon be executed under win2kserver? (We have a tape unit on a pc that runs win2k) Thank you --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today Regis

[Bacula-users] Bacula destroys DAT72 cartridges

2005-11-19 Thread Matjaz Slibar
Dear Kern, Dear Group I am using bacula 1.36.2-2 on Debian Sarge with HP StorageWorks DAT72 internal tape drive. Everything is working fine, except when one backup job spans over two tapes. In this situation Bacula destroys second cartridge. The cartridge is not usable any more even with tar.

[Bacula-users] smartalloc errors

2005-11-19 Thread Troy Stanger
I am using a custom compiled version 1.38 of the bacula-fd on a OS X Server running 10.4.3. When I try to perform a full dump of the connected xServer raid (~650Gb used) it will consistently fail in approximately the same spot of the backup. Annoyingly this spot is 4 tapes and 10 hrs into

[Bacula-users] Re: H2 have Bacula remove "expired" Volumes?

2005-11-19 Thread Ralf Folkerts
Kern Sibbald wrote: Hi Kern, > On Monday 14 November 2005 17:31, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: >> Quoting Ralf Folkerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> [snip] >> >> > However, the Volumes themself are never being removed from the >> > Filesystem with this config. AutoPrune nicely removes the Jobs and >> > Vol

[Bacula-users] Re: H2 have Bacula remove "expired" Volumes?

2005-11-19 Thread Ralf Folkerts
Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: Hi Jeffrey, > Quoting Ralf Folkerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [snip] >> However, the Volumes themself are never being removed from the Filesystem >> with this config. AutoPrune nicely removes the Jobs and Volumes from the >> Database but not the Volume-File itself. >> > >

[Bacula-users] Restore uses only first Storage defined?

2005-11-19 Thread Willard Korfhage
I'm having trouble getting a backup to restore, and was wondering if someone can tell me where I am going wrong, or if it is a bug. I am testing bacula on 2 machines, lintest being a backup server and va1 a client, all running linux and bacula 1.38.0. Because I wanted backups of lintest and va1 to

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrade 1.36.3 -> 1.38.1

2005-11-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 19 November 2005 15:24, Dimitri Puzin wrote: > Dimitri Puzin schrieb: > >Hello, > > > >I'm trying to upgrade my system from bacula 1.36.3 to newer 1.38.1. I'm > >using the MySQL backend. After the usual install I've ran the upgrade > >tables script and it looked good. However I cannot d

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with bacula web

2005-11-19 Thread drescher0110-bacula
> The problem was with postgres. Our db guy said that > it > had something to do with a library not compiled into > postgres that returns the current size of the > database > after problems trying to patch and recompile our > verson of postgres to use this library he instead > compiled in a functio

Re: [Bacula-users] 1.38.1 on FreeBSD "device not configured" and "mutex unlock failure"

2005-11-19 Thread Dan Langille
On 19 Nov 2005 at 15:59, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Saturday 19 November 2005 14:30, Dan Langille wrote: > > Josh/Kern, > > > > I'm pretty sure, but have not confirmed, that the FreeBSD port now > > installs the non-stripped binaries. > > Oh, that would be nice. It uses a bit more disk space, but

Re: [Bacula-users] 1.38.1 on FreeBSD "device not configured" and "mutex unlock failure"

2005-11-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 19 November 2005 14:30, Dan Langille wrote: > On 19 Nov 2005 at 12:01, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > Then, please make sure your binaries are not stripped by the installation > > proces so that the debugging symbols will be available, and run the > > Storage daemon under the debugger as descr

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrade 1.36.3 -> 1.38.1

2005-11-19 Thread Dimitri Puzin
Dimitri Puzin schrieb: >Hello, > >I'm trying to upgrade my system from bacula 1.36.3 to newer 1.38.1. I'm >using the MySQL backend. After the usual install I've ran the upgrade >tables script and it looked good. However I cannot do backups anymore. >The tapes get rotated, pruned and recycled but t

Re: [Bacula-users] 1.38.1 on FreeBSD "device not configured" and "mutex unlock failure"

2005-11-19 Thread Dan Langille
On 19 Nov 2005 at 12:01, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Then, please make sure your binaries are not stripped by the installation > proces so that the debugging symbols will be available, and run the Storage > daemon under the debugger as described in the Kaboom chapter. When it dies, > please get a tra

Re: [Bacula-users] bscan with multiple volumes

2005-11-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 19 November 2005 12:09, Tobias Barth wrote: > Kern Sibbald schrieb: > >On Saturday 19 November 2005 11:58, Tobias Barth wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>If I want to bscan from multiple volumes, I got the problem that the > >>concatenation of all volume labels may not be longer than 128 chars. S

Re: [Bacula-users] bscan with multiple volumes

2005-11-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Saturday 19 November 2005 11:58, Tobias Barth wrote: > Hi, > > If I want to bscan from multiple volumes, I got the problem that the > concatenation of all volume labels may not be longer than 128 chars. So > I cannot bscan from all volumes of a job in one bscan run. What happens > if I use bscan

Re: [Bacula-users] 1.38.1 on FreeBSD "device not configured" and "mutex unlock failure"

2005-11-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, This looks like a bug to me. You are getting a mutex (lock) failure probably because a mutex is being cleared twice. Normally this doesn't happen and FreeBSD passed all my regression scripts. However, I see that in your case, Bacula did not recognize the tape as a Bacula labeled tape,

[Bacula-users] bscan with multiple volumes

2005-11-19 Thread Tobias Barth
Hi, If I want to bscan from multiple volumes, I got the problem that the concatenation of all volume labels may not be longer than 128 chars. So I cannot bscan from all volumes of a job in one bscan run. What happens if I use bscan runs - will all file records be read into the database? Alter