On May 23, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Michael Short wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I realize that Bacula was originally developed for tape based backup
> systems, but disk space is becoming more inexpensive everyday. It is
> cheaper and more reliable to maintain a system which uses disk based
> mediums to store back
On Dec 9, 2008, at 9:19 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> "The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
> packages"
>
> I heard about the first URL, which leads to the other two:
>
>
> http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?execution=e4s1
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/200
On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:37 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 December 2008 08:55:23 Peter Mottram wrote:
>> Dan Langille wrote:
>>> "The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
>>> packages"
>>>
>>> I heard about the first URL, which leads to the other two:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Dec 9, 2008, at 9:49 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>
> Committed revision 8134.
>
> On an unrelated note, why is that a print 0 and not a print $0 or
> something similar.
>
Huh. Dunno. That might be an error in the original scriptor it
might not.
Adam
I know that VSS doesn't (yet, I hope) work in 64-bit mode. Does the
same limitation apply to the Exchange plugin? I have a 64-bit
Exchange 2007 server running on Windows Server 2008, and I'd like to
be able to stop the silly wbadmin-to-network-share backup I've been
doing as a workaround
On Feb 23, 2009, at 6:46 PM, James Harper wrote:
>> I know that VSS doesn't (yet, I hope) work in 64-bit mode. Does the
>> same limitation apply to the Exchange plugin? I have a 64-bit
>> Exchange 2007 server running on Windows Server 2008, and I'd like to
>> be able to stop the silly wbadmin-t
On Feb 24, 2009, at 5:43 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> Otherwise, please wait for the next beta version which will have the
> Win64
> binaries installer.
All things considered, this sounds much, much easier.
Although a cross-compilation environment also sounds easier than
installing an MS too
On Feb 24, 2009, at 7:08 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 February 2009 12:46:00 James Harper wrote:
>>>
>> My curiosity was about if the Microsoft provided exchange backup dll
>> could backup a 64 bit version of exchange from a 32 bit app. If it
>> uses
>> a non-direct-call interface to
On Mar 4, 2009, at 6:49 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
hi
i've created a bacula beta (2.5) repository for debian etch.
because of unsatisfied build dependencies in etch i've removed the
gui's
and the traymonitor.
as kern wrote, that sqlite2 will be kicked out, i've also removed the
sqlite2 pac
On Mar 5, 2009, at 5:21 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> hi
>
> i've extended the repo: now lenny and etch in amd64 and i386 are
> available.
Great news! Thanks!
I probably won't get around to it for a while unless I am prodded, but
if anyone else *wants* s390, PPC, or armv5tel (NSLU2 is *my* ARM
Pardon me if this is a dumb question, but will the 2.5.42 clients be
able to talk to an older director/SD without a catalog upgrade?
I *really* want to be using 64-bit VSS support on some of my Windows
boxes, but I'm not currently in a position to upgrade the director and
SD. Will this work
On Mar 29, 2009, at 3:17 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> Yes, I am suggesting that all distros should use the Bacula
> recommended
> configuration. We can then automate a lot of nice stuff.
Look at this from the point of view of a distributor:
*Every* application vendor believes his product is a
On Jul 31, 2009, at 1:41 AM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
>
> Am 31.07.2009 08:28, schrieb Kern Sibbald:
>> This crept in because the developers are all working on Qt 4.3 or
>> Qt 4.4. I
>> don't think we actually used any 4.3 features in bat -- in any
>> case, once you
>> are on a particular versio
On Jun 28, 2007, at 7:13 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> If you are familar with RT, I would appreciate hearing your
> comments about
> this proposal. If you are not familar with RT, you might want to
> take a look
> at their site, though reading their documentation and viewing their
> screensho
On Jul 12, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Thursday 12 July 2007 15:21, Dan Langille wrote:
>> On 12 Jul 2007 at 15:15, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> If no one wants to test the Win32 version and report back on it
>>> (particularly Vista, Vista VSS, and reparse points), I will test it
>>> my
On Jul 13, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Eric Bollengier wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/regress/weird-files2$ cp -Rp weird-files weird-files2
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/regress/weird-files2$ ls -i | grep normal
> 339098 another-hardlink-to-normalfile
> 339119 hardlink-to-normalfile
> 339103 normalfile
>
>
On Jul 16, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Bill Moran wrote:
> So, I think it's a good plan from every angle. Furthermore, I
> think that
> anyone who doesn't think it's a good plan either hasn't reviewed it
> thoroughly, or has some strange axe to grind.
Well, as someone who works for an organization that w
On Oct 18, 2007, at 8:33 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> I'm a bit reluctant to implement this patch since it is really a
> fix very
> specific to Debian (and derivatives) all the other distributions
> I've seen
> have either qt3 or qt4 loaded for development, but not both.
>
My question is whether
I was enjoying the fairly-frequent OS X .dmg builds at
pixelchaos.net, but the site appears to have been eviscerated.
Anyone know what happened?
Adam
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Pap
On Feb 12, 2008, at 2:26 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> One hash is not possible without seriously restricting user's
> flexibility --
> the MD5 field though not totally used as planned in 2.2. (hopefully
> it will
> be in 2.2) is a critical field for security and certain government
> legal
> r
On Feb 13, 2008, at 5:47 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> Ubuntu are now asking us if awk would be preferable over Pyton?
>
> My opinion: awk will be in the base system of most operating systems.
> Python might not be. Both are acceptable to me.
Python is not yet ubiquitous, but it's getting there.
> The bacula.org server has some problems, and we are rebuilding it
> on a new server. It may take some days.
>
>
On the bright side, you probably had good backups!
Adam
___
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourc
22 matches
Mail list logo
