Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 11 possible bug in accurate and verify jobs

2021-03-17 Thread Eric Bollengier via Bacula-devel
Hello Wanderlei, On 3/16/21 21:18, Wanderlei Huttel wrote: > Hello Eric > > Thanks for answer me. > I've noticed that the problem is only in verify job. > In the manual letter "M" is a correct configuration. > https://www.bacula.org/11.0.x-manuals/en/main/Configuring_Director.html#accuratemode Y

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 11 possible bug in accurate and verify jobs

2021-03-17 Thread Wanderlei Huttel
I know that in the Bacula Community Documentation there are some wrong or old informations that must be fixed. Just a question. In the older versions (like 9X) why the option "M" in verify jobs didn't show any errors? Best regards *Wanderlei Hüttel* Em qua., 17 de mar. de 2021 às 05:43, Eric B

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 11 possible bug in accurate and verify jobs

2021-03-17 Thread Eric Bollengier via Bacula-devel
Hello Wanderlei, On 3/17/21 15:55, Wanderlei Huttel wrote: > I know that in the Bacula Community Documentation there are some wrong or > old informations that must be fixed. > Just a question. In the older versions (like 9X) why the option "M" in > verify jobs didn't show any errors? Because it w

[Bacula-devel] check_bacula fd problem on 11.0.1

2021-03-17 Thread ulrich . leodolter
Hi, check_bacula fails on file daemon (version 11.0.1): $ check_bacula -H localhost -D fd -M vlbackup.obvsg.at-mon -K secretsecret BACULA CRITICAL - FileDaemon Status: Events: code=FC0002 daemon=vlbackup.obvsg.at-fd ref=0x7fe29000ee58 type=connection source=vlbackup.obvsg.at-mon text=Director c