Hello Eric,
czw., 4 mar 2021 o 10:31 Eric Bollengier
napisał(a):
> > and the Debian is using readline only for Bacula:
>
> Debian folks had a long "battle" because readline was GPL and not
> compatible with non-pure-GPL software, something like that. I don't know
> what was the final result of t
Hello Radek,
On 3/4/21 10:04, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
> Hello Eric,
>
> czw., 4 mar 2021 o 09:25 Eric Bollengier
> napisał(a):
>
>> On Debian at least, users have the choice between two readline
>> implementations, libedit and libreadline. They are supposed to be
>> compatible (this is mos
Hello Eric,
czw., 4 mar 2021 o 09:25 Eric Bollengier
napisał(a):
> On Debian at least, users have the choice between two readline
> implementations, libedit and libreadline. They are supposed to be
> compatible (this is mostly a license issue with libreadline if I
> remember correctly).
>
In my
Hello Radek,
On 3/3/21 20:56, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> śr., 3 mar 2021 o 18:10 Eric Bollengier napisał(a):
>
>> Hello Radek,
>>
>> On 3/3/21 17:40, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The readline manual (from Debian) gives:
>>>
>>> READLINE(3)
>>>
>>> Library F
Hello,
śr., 3 mar 2021 o 18:10 Eric Bollengier napisał(a):
> Hello Radek,
>
> On 3/3/21 17:40, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The readline manual (from Debian) gives:
> >
> > READLINE(3)
> >
> > Library Functions Manual
> >
> > READLINE(3)
> >
> > NAME
>
Hello Radek,
On 3/3/21 17:40, Radosław Korzeniewski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The readline manual (from Debian) gives:
>
> READLINE(3)
>
> Library Functions Manual
>
> READLINE(3)
>
> NAME
>readline - get a line from a user with editing
>
> SYNOPSIS
>#inclu
