Flooding performance corresponds to how much content you can send from nodes in
the traces being source and constantly flooding to all other nodes being
recipients.
Since we lose some time for the election of mobile AP nodes, this is where
nothing is transferred and hence some capacity is lost.
>>> We have proposed an alternative to WiFi Ad Hoc called WiFi-Opp, which
>>> is more flexible and doesn't require pairing (as in WiFi Direct which
>>> we tested on Galaxy SII).
>> Very interesting work, although I'm not sure it's an alternative to
>> ad-hoc.
> Well, our goal is to allow "ad hoc"
Comments inline:
On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:02 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
We have proposed an alternative to WiFi Ad Hoc called WiFi-Opp, which
is more flexible and doesn't require pairing (as in WiFi Direct which
we tested on Galaxy SII).
Very interesting work, although I'm not sure it's an a
> We have proposed an alternative to WiFi Ad Hoc called WiFi-Opp, which
> is more flexible and doesn't require pairing (as in WiFi Direct which
> we tested on Galaxy SII).
Very interesting work, although I'm not sure it's an alternative to
ad-hoc.
The tl;dr version: they're running in infrastruct
4 matches
Mail list logo
