I find Unity approach to multiple virtual desktops extremely half-hearted:
it just provides the option to used them and an icon which you can't remove
from the bar.
Unity could use virtual desktop in a transparent way:
1-Don't show icon if only a desktop is being used.
2-*Apps. should open in a n
1 18:14, Jamu Kakar wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Jorge Ortega
> wrote:
> > I find Unity approach to multiple virtual desktops extremely
> half-hearted:
> > it just provides the option to used them and an icon which you can't
> remove
&
space with the
> new window open.
>
> --Chris
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:07 PM, Jorge Ortega
> wrote:
>
>> Hi jamur,
>>
>>
>> I don't want the shell to make arbitrary decisions for me
>>>
>>
>> the decision to o
ect performance?
>
> I agree that workspaces need more accessible default behaviour but I don't
> think this is it.
>
> --Chris
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Jorge Ortega
> wrote:
>
>> Christopher,
>>
>> But the new app would open right in
uity
of "how the hell do I find my way through this mess of 10 open windows in
the same workspace". This is the problem I was trying to address.
How many time have you seen it (or suffered it)? some one trying to find
that app varied between many other windows...
On 14 April 2011 22:10,
>
> Currently when the dash is already open, switching to another lense from
> the launcher takes two clicks, instead of the more natural one. Even worse,
> the first click closes the dash, which completely contradicts a users
> expectation, because he was expecting the dash to stay visible
>
.
You
I really don't understand this kind of reasoning.
IMHO this is a case of creating a very real problem by means of fixing a
very theoretical one. I find *consistency* a well over-used concept: one can
try to force consistent behaviour between any two given elements in a web of
many others (and in t
for all Dashes, the Ubuntu-Logo-Dash, the Applications-Dash and
> the Files-and-Folders-Dash - why not for the other symbols on the launcher?
>
> So much for consistency.
>
>
>
>
> On 19.04.2011 20:41, Jorge Ortega wrote:
>
> I really don't understand
>
> Those who have been arguing for minimizing on yet another click on the
> launcher will likely not be satisfied with an option
>
I would definitely be satisfied by this [?] just like I'm satisfied by the
possibility of changing the launcher size or his hiding behaviour
On 21 June 2011 10:13, Th
I think it is an interesting solution. I suggested before something a bit
more radical: that every application when open, would create its own virtual
workspace. To do this only for maximised applications is also, I think, a
good idea.
On 21 July 2011 19:36, Jonathan Meek wrote:
> I recently sa
10 matches
Mail list logo
