the automatically-generated windicators (as window decorations) would be was
to small in the preview to be of any real use to most users. Maybe either
emlemized over the preview, or under the preview name? Perhaps the same
could be done when "zoomed out" in gnome-shell/gnome 3.
On May 17, 2010 5:5
Somewhat contrived user story: suppose I have a whole bunch of applications
open, and all of them have some sort of audio playing, and all of them have
a volume level windicator. If one application starts playing some sound too
loud, I can see -- while I'm alt-tabbing -- what the respective sound
s of what should and what shouldn't be in a windicator.
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Alex Schoof wrote:
>
> Somewhat contrived...
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : http
+1
This is one of those focus-stealing issues that most users (new and veteran)
wouldn't notice if. It were fixed, but provides an annoyance from time to
time. I feel like this is a papercut worth fixing.
On May 20, 2010 2:13 PM, "Frederik Nnaji" wrote:
hello again ;)
i attached a screenshot s
I don't think anyone would ever argue that we shouldn't be intergrity
checking boot media (or at least presenting the option); while I never
considered it a pain point, I guess I could see a new user getting confused
and giving up. Maybe the solution is to have the FIRST menu a user sees be
"boot o
+1
Chromium now can do LHS, but you're right: there are a lot of common
applications where button placemennt is inconsistant. The gnome-shell point
isbalso valid, with gnome 3 just around the corner, we need to nail this
down.
On May 24, 2010 4:13 PM, "Tyler Brainerd" wrote:
+1 to all of these.
What's the current band aid?
On May 24, 2010 3:34 PM, "Mark Shuttleworth" wrote:
On 24/05/10 16:57, Conscious User wrote:
> I think the ideal would be not to steal focus *if the use...
It's definitely not a papercut :-)
Personally, I think trying to prevent focus-stealing does more harm than
go
Alright, well cross that one off the list.
On May 24, 2010 4:59 PM, "Tyler Brainerd" wrote:
apparently its denying its a problem.
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Alex Schoof wrote:
>
> What's the current...
___
Mailing list:
+1
Its not an issue of rebranding releases, its a matter of changing how
projects evolve from ideas to something on the desktop.
On Jun 7, 2010 10:50 AM, "Mark Curtis" wrote:
Telling users Lucid will be an LTS for the past two years and then suddenly
reverting to a previous release a month AFTE
9 matches
Mail list logo
