Goodmorning (GMT+1) to all. Yesterday I tried Precise, and it works
very good. I have seen that it is a bit slower and more fat than the
gnome-shell, as it happened for 11.10, 11.04, ... . I guess it is due
to compiz, which is more heavy than mutter. Why don't use mutter then?
Unity doesn't use eff
Unity is a Compiz plugin.
> Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:22:15 +0100
> From: supernova...@gmail.com
> To: ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: [Ayatana] why compiz in place of mutter
>
> Goodmorning (GMT+1) to all. Yesterday I tried Precise, and it works
> very good. I have seen that it is a bit
On 29/01/2012 16:22, supernova wrote:
> Goodmorning (GMT+1) to all. Yesterday I tried Precise, and it works
> very good. I have seen that it is a bit slower and more fat than the
> gnome-shell, as it happened for 11.10, 11.04, ... . I guess it is due
> to compiz, which is more heavy than mutter. Wh
Em 29-01-2012 10:10, Chow Loong Jin escreveu:
On 29/01/2012 16:22, supernova wrote:
Goodmorning (GMT+1) to all. Yesterday I tried Precise, and it works
very good. I have seen that it is a bit slower and more fat than the
gnome-shell, as it happened for 11.10, 11.04, ... . I guess it is due
to c
On 29/01/2012 20:55, Conscious User wrote:
>
> Em 29-01-2012 10:10, Chow Loong Jin escreveu:
>> On 29/01/2012 16:22, supernova wrote:
>>> Goodmorning (GMT+1) to all. Yesterday I tried Precise, and it works
>>> very good. I have seen that it is a bit slower and more fat than the
>>> gnome-shell, as
Em 29-01-2012 10:58, Chow Loong Jin escreveu:
On 29/01/2012 20:55, Conscious User wrote:
Em 29-01-2012 10:10, Chow Loong Jin escreveu:
On 29/01/2012 16:22, supernova wrote:
Goodmorning (GMT+1) to all. Yesterday I tried Precise, and it works
very good. I have seen that it is a bit slower and m
You can not be serious. Im not fan of moving away from the Gnome project at
all, but sticking with compiz was one of the best descisions made in ubuntu
so far. Unity is noticeably MUCH faster even on my low-spec netbook. Mutter
uses 20% of cpu with falf the frame rate on it, while Compiz eats about
You should check out these:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_desktop_managers1&num=3
Anyway i hope mutter will improve in the future. But i wouldnt stick with
it desipte low memory usage.
--
*Csonka Bálint* @913
___
Mailing lis
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 15:37, balint...@gmail.com wrote:
> You can not be serious. Im not fan of moving away from the Gnome project
> at all, but sticking with compiz was one of the best descisions made in
> ubuntu so far.
For example the "Cube" was an outstanding feature. People used to come t
maybe it is because I have intel graphics, but I find gnomeshell
faster then unity, at first and clean installation I mean. Let's hope
better for the future...
Supernova
2012/1/29 balint...@gmail.com :
> You should check out these:
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_desktop
On 29/01/2012 23:53, supernova wrote:
> maybe it is because I have intel graphics, but I find gnomeshell
> faster then unity, at first and clean installation I mean. Let's hope
> better for the future...
I have two laptops, one of which runs on the Intel GMA 965/X3100, and another
running on Sandy
i started using gnome shell on my desktop and unity 2d on my htpc
the reason i stopped using unity 3d on my desktop is because every now and
then while i was playing WoW in wine it would cause my framerates to drop
to unplayable (i'm talking like .5 to 3 fps) levels.
yea it seems gnome shell and mu
sudo apt-get remove appmenu-gtk3 appmenu-gtk appmenu-qt to remove global menu.
And you can set the launcher to appear when the mouse hits the top left corner
so it is more like gnome-shell.
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:57:20 -0600
From: holyknightjos...@gmail.com
To: ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
supernova wrote on 29/01/12 08:22:
>
> Goodmorning (GMT+1) to all. Yesterday I tried Precise, and it
> works very good. I have seen that it is a bit slower and more fat
> than the gnome-shell, as it happened for 11.10, 11.04, ... . I
> guess it is due
2012/1/29 Chow Loong Jin
> On 29/01/2012 23:53, supernova wrote:
> > maybe it is because I have intel graphics, but I find gnomeshell
> > faster then unity, at first and clean installation I mean. Let's hope
> > better for the future...
>
> I have two laptops, one of which runs on the Intel GMA 9
i know i can remove the global app menus that way but i don't really like
to do that since the remaining app menus don't really match so great with
the window decorations... or at least they didn't a few months ago. also i
kinda want to keep unity as full unity as i can so i can actually check out
Own up a large number roof different applications, and the load that
Unity/Compiz handles without a hitch brings the frame rates in Gnome
Shell/Mutter crashing down. Mutter will seem smoother at first, but this
tells me that it's inferior in terms of resource management.
On Jan 29, 2012 3:34 PM, "J
17 matches
Mail list logo
