Hi!
Workspaces
--
The purpose of workspaces is having a means of organizing windows in
sets and making it simple and fast to switch between them. Making one
set visible means hiding all others (except when going into an overview).
Each workspace holds a set of windows in a specific l
Yep, it is nautilus. Try ctrl+1, ctrl+2 and ctrl+3.
On 01/11/11 05:24, James Jenner wrote:
Hi All,
I just noticed last night that the tool bar for the file browser under
unity (I presume this is nautilus) has gone for 11.10. Obviously this
is intentional but does anyone know why?
The only r
Hello,
I've been using Ubuntu for a quite long time and the fact that bothers
me most is Libreoffice integration. Libreoffice looks very out-of-sync
with rest of the desktop. I think someone should look after
libreoffice-gtk package.
There are some issues:
- Dotted outline around labels on b
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Workspaces
> --
>
> The purpose of workspaces is having a means of organizing windows in sets
> and making it simple and fast to switch between them. Making one set visible
> means hiding all others (except when going into an
Another place to perhaps search for ideas for implementation would be
the Compiz "Group and Tab Windows" plugin available from the
"compiz-fusion-plugins-extra" package*
*
On 01/11/11 12:53, Evan Huus wrote:
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
Hi!
Workspaces
--
I'm subscribed to the Ayatana list and receive all messages daily, but
I'm apparently unable to send to the list.
I've verified that the email address used for my subscription matches
that in both the "from" and "reply-to" fields of my email client
("ambassa...@fourthworld.com"), but still I can't
Ryan G (rtgkid) has assigned this bug to you for unity in Ubuntu:
When trying to right-click on the Skype icon, or any other, sometimes
Unity freezes until I open up dash.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: unity 4.22.0-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic
Ryan G (rtgkid) has assigned this bug to you for unity in Ubuntu:
When trying to right-click on the Skype icon, or any other, sometimes
Unity freezes until I open up dash.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: unity 4.22.0-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic
Yes. Here is the link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/874141
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Omar B. wrote:
>
> bug report link ?
>
>
> > From: rtg...@gmail.com
> > Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:48:15 -0500
> > To: ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
> > Sub
** Changed in: unity
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ayatana Discussion (ayatana)
** Changed in: unity
Assignee: Ayatana Discussion (ayatana) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: unity
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ayatana Discussion (ayatana)
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassig
Apologies for the last email. Although I've been unable to send email
to the list through my email client, apparently the form on the Ayatana
page labeled "Contact this team's email address" (which I mistakenly
believed would go to the admin) works for sending email to this list.
Sorry about the c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I got your message here just fine.
Cheers,
James Gifford
On 11/01/2011 10:39 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I got your message here just fine.
Cheers,
James Gifford
On 11/01/2011 10:39 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> I'm subscribed to the Ayatana list and receive all messages daily,
> but I'm apparently unable to send to the list.
>
> I've verified that the
Den 01. nov. 2011 01:24, skrev James Jenner:
Hi All,
I just noticed last night that the tool bar for the file browser under
unity (I presume this is nautilus) has gone for 11.10. Obviously this
is intentional but does anyone know why?
That is not Unity. That is Gnome 3. Unity is used to laun
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Workspaces
> > --
> >
> > The purpose of workspaces is having a means of organizing windows in sets
> > and making it simple and fast to switch between them. Making on
On 11/01/2011 01:53 PM, Evan Huus wrote:
The only advantage the current implementation has in my opinion is
simplicity of representation - while I'm quite impressed by sets, I
have no clear idea how the user-interface for them would work. They
expose so many different states and actions that add
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Assignment
** Changed in: unity
Assignee: Ayatana Discussion (ayatana) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ayatana Discussion (ayatana) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ayatana
Discussion
Isn't the "sets" idea similar to kde-activities ?
http://maketecheasier.com/use-kde-plasma-activities/2010/09/01
http://lifehacker.com/5668873/use-kde-activities-to-create-different-desktops-for-work-and-personal-use
the "virtual desktops" we have are indeed primitive in comparison.
--
On 11/01/2011 06:18 PM, Omar B. wrote:
Isn't the "sets" idea similar to kde-activities ?
http://maketecheasier.com/use-kde-plasma-activities/2010/09/01
http://lifehacker.com/5668873/use-kde-activities-to-create-different-desktops-for-work-and-personal-use
From what I understand without trying
On 11/01/2011 04:49 PM, staticd wrote:
3)Technical issues:
a)how to deal with Z stacking across multiple sets.
At first I wanted to say similar to how Inkscape handles z-order and
groups, each set having an internal z-order. But then you wouldn't be
able to bring a single window of a lower se
I cant really make an opinion on kde activities as the last time i used it
(briefly) was on 4.5 and over a year has passed and we are at 4.7 so might be a
good time to try it out again. As far as i can tell the concept is great and
would love to start using something like that, but i just cant
For me personally, a garden variety dock on the bottom of my screen is
still more useful than the Unity launcher. In this case, I am using
Docky, and in the screenshot below, you can see both the launcher and
Docky on my desktop, and it just looks more cluttered than it needs to:
http://i.imgu
Den 01. nov. 2011 21:26, skrev anthropornis:
Will Canonical ever permit the user to disable the launcher so that he
or she can use the dock of their choice (or something else altogether)?
Canonical has chosen to permit 100% configurability. Is that awesome, or
what?
Jo-Erlend Schinstad
__
>I don't follow this list consistently, so I am not clear on this, is it
a matter of the devs haven't gotten around to it yet, or is the design
team outright opposed to doing it?
i think it may be the first
> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:26:25 -0400
> Fro
> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 21:44:24 +0100
> From: joerlend.schins...@gmail.com
> To: ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Ayatana] option to disable Unity launcher
>
> Den 01. nov. 2011 21:26, skrev anthropornis:
> >
> > Will Canonical ever permit the user to disable the launcher so that he
Den 01. nov. 2011 22:09, skrev Mark Curtis:
> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 21:44:24 +0100
> From: joerlend.schins...@gmail.com
> To: ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Ayatana] option to disable Unity launcher
>
> Den 01. nov. 2011 21:26, skrev anthropornis:
> >
> > Will Canonical ever permit
On 02/11/11 09:44, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
Den 01. nov. 2011 21:26, skrev anthropornis:
Will Canonical ever permit the user to disable the launcher so that he
or she can use the dock of their choice (or something else altogether)?
Canonical has chosen to permit 100% configurability. Is tha
Den 01. nov. 2011 22:15, skrev Tim Penhey:
On 02/11/11 09:44, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
Den 01. nov. 2011 21:26, skrev anthropornis:
Will Canonical ever permit the user to disable the launcher so that he
or she can use the dock of their choice (or something else altogether)?
Canonical has c
I'm not sure I understand your reply, I cannot tell if you are being
facetious or what
On 11/01/2011 04:44 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
Den 01. nov. 2011 21:26, skrev anthropornis:
Will Canonical ever permit the user to disable the launcher so that
he or she can use the dock of their choic
i dont understand his reply either
but i think this would be a better source:
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/11/ubuntu-desktop-designers-clarify-on-configurability
> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 17:47:32 -0400
> From: anthropor...@gmail.com
> To: ayatana@lists.
On 2 November 2011 01:23, Jo-Erlend Schinstad
wrote:
> Den 01. nov. 2011 01:24, skrev James Jenner:
>
> Hi All,
>>
>> I just noticed last night that the tool bar for the file browser under
>> unity (I presume this is nautilus) has gone for 11.10. Obviously this is
>> intentional but does anyone k
Nautilus Elementary had it right in this department; since it is no
longer being maintained, I hope Marlin will be an option soon, and will
retain all that was good about Nautilus Elementary, and maybe gain some
bulk-rename functionality from Thunar.
While I love keyboard shortcuts, some peopl
Den 02. nov. 2011 02:30, skrev anthropornis:
Nautilus Elementary had it right in this department; since it is no
longer being maintained, I hope Marlin will be an option soon, and
will retain all that was good about Nautilus Elementary, and maybe
gain some bulk-rename functionality from Thunar.
On 2 November 2011 11:30, anthropornis wrote:
> Nautilus Elementary had it right in this department; since it is no
> longer being maintained, I hope Marlin will be an option soon, and will
> retain all that was good about Nautilus Elementary, and maybe gain some
> bulk-rename functionality from
Or I could click one button one time. That is the essence of simplicity.
Hopefully this will return in the future, whether from upstream, a
Nautilus extension, a Canonical patch, or a Canonical selection of a
different file manager as default.
On 11/01/2011 09:39 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrot
On 02/11/2011 11:14, anthropornis wrote:
> Or I could click one button one time. That is the essence of simplicity.
You could say that for every commonly used feature there is.
I don't frequently change views, for example, but I frequently change between
showing hidden files and not. I also creat
On 2 November 2011 13:34, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On 02/11/2011 11:14, anthropornis wrote:
> > Or I could click one button one time. That is the essence of simplicity.
>
> You could say that for every commonly used feature there is.
>
> I don't frequently change views, for example, but I frequent
He's being quite facetious. He means you are free to edit the source code
and make Unity be gave exactly the way you want.
On Nov 1, 2011 6:11 PM, "Omar B." wrote:
>
> i dont understand his reply either
>
> but i think this would be a better source:
>
> http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/11/ubuntu-
On 02/11/2011 12:25, James Jenner wrote:
>
> The solution before the current solution was to have a toolbar with buttons
> for
> common actions. Who said that the solution that was 'current' previously had
> to
> change?
Upstream, I guess, but wouldn't you agree it looks much cleaner this way?
In Nautilus Elementary I had 3 buttons to switch views (icon, list,
compact). It was on the same row as the location (text or breadcrumb)
and was not cluttered for me at all.
Cluttered is A) in the eye of the beholder B) dependent on screen
resolution and C) typically something one can toggle
Agreed.
Maybe the evolution of Nautilus, and Gnome in general, will move to
completely terminal based everything, much less cluttered that way, no
ugly GUI's tarnishing our screens.
Maybe we need a file manager based on Emacs!
On 11/02/2011 12:25 AM, James Jenner wrote:
And you haven't addr
I suspected that. Naturally, at least 98% of Canonical's new target
demographic(s) is quite capable of editing the source.
Certainly, if I had the know-how, I could just go create my own OS from
scratch, build my own mobo from scratch, etc. This is Ubuntu, not Arch,
and yes, everyone knows the
On 02/11/2011 12:43, anthropornis wrote:
> In Nautilus Elementary I had 3 buttons to switch views (icon, list, compact).
> It
> was on the same row as the location (text or breadcrumb) and was not cluttered
> for me at all.
Strange. In my Nautilus Elementary, the buttons were on the status bar be
On 11/02/2011 12:43 AM, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
Upstream, I guess, but wouldn't you agree it looks much cleaner this way?
It would be even cleaner without those pesky files listed in the middle.
Hence, if we're going to add the change-view buttons onto the toolbar, then
please add my show hidde
On 11/02/2011 01:09 AM, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
In Nautilus Elementary I had 3 buttons to switch views (icon, list, compact). It
was on the same row as the location (text or breadcrumb) and was not cluttered
for me at all.
Strange. In my Nautilus Elementary, the buttons were on the status bar besid
Den 02. nov. 2011 06:24, skrev anthropornis:
On 11/02/2011 01:09 AM, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
In Nautilus Elementary I had 3 buttons to switch views (icon, list,
compact). It
was on the same row as the location (text or breadcrumb) and was not
cluttered
for me at all.
Strange. In my Nautilus Elem
46 matches
Mail list logo
