I read the "A better Linux Desktop" article and the author proposed removing
the launcher, this is what I think is the strength of Unity. Although it was
an interesting read.
I have actually been thinking of how you could merge the top panel elements
into the launcher elegantly and I will create a
I have to admit that this isn't completely thought through, not much at all
actually, it's more an initiative to spark creativity.
I believe that what really sets the Gnome/Unity desktop apart from OS X and
Windows is the panel applications you can have. They are really effective
and provide a lot
On 5/19/11, Ed Lin wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Ralph Green wrote:
>> 2. MPT seems to think the global menu is quicker, even on large
>> screens. That is certainly not my experience. ... The
>> question is how typical am I?
>> 3. Why do people keep referring to Fitt's law. It
On 5/19/11, Ed Lin wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Ralph Green wrote:
>> 2. MPT seems to think the global menu is quicker, even on large
>> screens. That is certainly not my experience. ... The
>> question is how typical am I?
>> 3. Why do people keep referring to Fitt's law. It
Sorry about the message with no subject. I just sent it again with
the proper subject, so please ignore this thread.
On 5/21/11, Ralph Green wrote:
> On 5/19/11, Ed Lin wrote:
>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Ralph Green wrote:
>>> 2. MPT seems to think the global menu is quicker, even on
>> screens. That is certainly not my experience. ... The
>> question is how typical am I?
This will probably hurt my case, but I have been thinking about this
part. Part of the Fitt's Law calculation is also based on the target
size. The theory is supposed to imply that a target at the edge
6 matches
Mail list logo
