View the mockups here:
http://i.imgur.com/MoBCJ.png
http://i.imgur.com/HBW9k.png
http://i.imgur.com/xo8TT.png
Just my 25 cents!
--
This message was sent from Launchpad by
Muhammad Nabil (https://launchpad.net/~ghogaru)
using the "Contact this team" link on the Ayatana Discussion team page
(https
Actually, this is easily configurable on ccsm (grid plugin). Maybe the
*default* behaviour could be discussed here, but the feature is already
implemented.
On Dom, 2011-03-13 at 19:42 -0300, klevi...@gmail.com wrote:
> You know, Snap (or Aero Snap) is a great feature and very useful
> indeed, but
If you are talking about the text on title bar, it is there by design
(because when you are working with non-maximized windows, you need to
know where and what are each of them).
On Dom, 2011-03-13 at 22:48 -0600, Ian Santopietro wrote:
> I do agree somewhat, though it is useful for finding the id
Yes, Folders in the launcher is a good idea to avoid overfilling it. I'm
used to have folders in my previous launchers or docks as well.
On 13.03.2011 12:29, David wrote:
Hi,
my idea:
we have 3 types of "folders" ( or mini-dash ;-) )
one for files
one for launchers
and one for open windows (im
Well, the animation time of Expo (workspace zooming) is 0.3 seconds by
default. The animation time of minimizing is 0.22 seconds. I don't think
that this makes difference in pratice.
Although I don't realize any slow effect, the animation times can be
configured using ccsm (but I think that the cu
OK, as this troubled me too much, I filed a bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/734253
("very hard to distinguish/select text documents in the expose window
spread")
this bug is now tagged as "needs-design", so if anyone from you likes to
demonstrate his/her design skills
The mockups look like good. It's a suggestion for dash navigation (that
does not exist yet). It's similar to USC navigation, and doing it this
way is really nice for consistency.
However, it's too late for Natty. The dash navigation will be designed
and implemented only for Natty+1.
On Seg, 2011-
I feel like those mockups remove the focus of Dash as a sort of "Search
engine". Search foremost. Also, I was under the assumption that the finished
Dash would mimick the current state of Unity-2D (With fancy compiz effects,
of course.) I do like the bread crumbs though. Maybe if the left-right
lay
I don't feel changing the window border is necessary.
The new transparency options provide a nice look and make it easily
accessible. However, the current Unity panel, with any transparency, is out
of touch with both the window titlebars and the Unity desktop. This image
serves to keep the design
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Ritchie wrote on 08/03/11 10:57:
>
> The global menu is based on the assumption that it's easier to hit the
> corner of the screen than it is to hit the edge of the active window.
>
> This breaks down, however, when the mouse doesn't actually st
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kostas & Sytske wrote on 11/03/11 16:04:
>...
> At the moment it is only possible to maximize a window but it's not
> possible to minimize a window in Unity by clicking it's icon.
> The minimize button in the top panel is a option but it would be nice
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Marco Biscaro
wrote:
> If you are talking about the text on title bar, it is there by design
> (because when you are working with non-maximized windows, you need to
> know where and what are each of them).
>
> On Dom, 2011-03-13 at 22:48 -0600, Ian Santopietro wrot
> Additionally, with the window title and controls visible in the panel
> for maximized windows, I don't feel it's confusing for a user to
> understand that the panel *is* the title bar in that case. A panel
> that looks like the title bar is not required for this distinction to
> be apparent; th
Actually, and I already mentioned this to Phong, but that isn't a mockup,,
rather what my panel looks like after tweaking my Ambiance theme. The Panel
does follow the user preferences.
I don't feel like the unity pane and the window titlebar are the same thing,
rather the panel provides titlebar-l
2011/3/11 Cyrille Ngassam Nkwenga
> Hi all
>
> Would it be not a good idea to make the launcher more living by adding a
> zoom when we are moving the mouse over an icon on the launcher as Docky does
> ?
> Unity has made a good step forward and it would good to make it more living
> by adding this
I've seen many calling for an aero-peek-like function to be brought
into Unity. I would like to say that by and large this is completely
unnecessary given that Unity's already present expo feature.* However
I do see that there is room for improvement in the implementation with
the addition of tab/d
> Actually, and I already mentioned this to Phong, but that isn't a
> mockup,, rather what my panel looks like after tweaking my Ambiance
> theme. The Panel does follow the user preferences.
My bad. Where I said "current visual of the panel" I actually meant
"current visual of the launcher". The
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 20:58, gnomeu...@gmail.com wrote:
> 2011/3/11 Cyrille Ngassam Nkwenga
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Would it be not a good idea to make the launcher more living by adding a
>> zoom when we are moving the mouse over an icon on the launcher as Docky does
>> ?
>> Unity has made a good s
In an effort to get *some* reaction other than Jeremy's to this
thread, let me ask something to the people of this list: how
many of you actually use Evolution? And how many of you feel
confortable with the current way it's integrated to the
Messaging Menu (and now Unity)?
More specifically, how
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Gian wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> that's my first time posting here, so hi! :)
>
> I think the proposed solutions of a 2-sided launcher have a great advantage
> over the current implementation: currently on large monitors the places
> shortcuts may end well below t
Overall I like 3 where all the gray icons (trash, drives, applications and
files & folders) are available when the dock is out. But I think the drives
should also be available when the dock is in like in 1.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
On Tuesday 15,March,2011 09:21 AM, Conscious User wrote:
>
> In an effort to get *some* reaction other than Jeremy's to this
> thread, let me ask something to the people of this list: how
> many of you actually use Evolution? And how many of you feel
> confortable with the current way it's integra
Disclaimer: I don't use evolution. Ive tried numerous times and each time I
have quickly returned to webmail. I have a simple mail notification program
with an option for going to the website and one turning the message menu
from green back to white.
I reinstalled evolution-indicator tonight to te
23 matches
Mail list logo
