Hi MPT,
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:40, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> > One solution could be merging the two menus, but that could create too
> > large a menu. A better solution could be to have the textbox and
> > buttons appear when the user sets
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
fain182 wrote on 12/10/10 09:53:
>
>> They don't have the same effect. The Rhythmbox item focuses Rhythmbox.
>> The track data item copies the track data to the clipboard.
>
> This is undiscoverable..
The effect of the Rhythmbox item should be obvious
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dylan McCall wrote on 13/10/10 18:08:
>...
> Right now a regular menu item is used as a title in one place
> (Rhythmbox), and an action in another (Mute). The font and spacing is
> identical in both cases.
>...
It's an action in both cases.
- --
Mat
Le jeudi 14 octobre 2010 à 10:50 +0100, Matthew Paul Thomas a écrit :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dylan McCall wrote on 13/10/10 18:08:
> >...
> > Right now a regular menu item is used as a title in one place
> > (Rhythmbox), and an action in another (Mute). The font and
> I agree that the effect of the track data item is pretty undiscoverable.
> I'd love to see suggestions for that.
This is more or less one of the points I was trying to make with my
original message. Technically, it does not *need* to have an effect,
there's nothing wrong with having purely info
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 07:16, cmaglothin wrote:
> I agree. The only reason I ever boot into Windows is that I have to annotate
> movies for a class, and Snap makes it very easy to do with just two clicks.
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:34 PM, David Hamm wrote:
>>
>> in fact i'd say it almost a upg
Let me make a suggestion on how to fix this usability problem. Simply
use font colors. There was already talk in Unity discussions of using
blue (or green?) for informational elements so I think that would fit
nicely. Long term it would probably best to allow theme developers to
define their own co
One thing I noticed is that the various design specification (Software
Center, Networking, DateTime, Notify-OSD etc.) are very scattered on
the Ubuntu Wiki. I would like for there to be a (single) page of
currently active specifications so we can avoid things like this:
http://www.reddit.com/r/Ubun
8 matches
Mail list logo