For a user who is not a programmer, the investment of time required to
learn the programming language, learn good programming practice, study the
framework documentation, the codebase itself which changes faster than one
can study it, and then write, debug, unit test and deploy the new feature,
the
On 11/01/2011 11:10 PM, Omar B. wrote:
i dont understand his reply either
but i think this would be a better source:
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/11/ubuntu-desktop-designers-clarify-on-configurability
But can you trust any of that, with Decepticons at the UDS?
(http://cdn.omgubuntu.co.uk/wp
Den 02. nov. 2011 06:07, skrev anthropornis:
I suspected that. Naturally, at least 98% of Canonical's new target
demographic(s) is quite capable of editing the source.
You were talking about Canonical not giving their permission for you to
have a feature. That is provocative since they grant
untu-desktop-designers-clarify-on-configurability
> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 17:47:32 -0400
> From: anthropor...@gmail.com <mailto:anthropor...@gmail.com>
> To: ayatana@lists.launchpad.net <mailto:ayatana@lists.launchpad
ww.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/11/ubuntu-desktop-designers-clarify-on-configurability
>
>
> > Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 17:47:32 -0400
> > From: anthropor...@gmail.com
> > To: ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
> > Subject: Re: [Ayatana] option t
: ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Ayatana] option to disable Unity launcher
>
> I'm not sure I understand your reply, I cannot tell if you are being
> facetious or what
>
> On 11/01/2011 04:44 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
> > Den 01. nov. 2011 21:26, skrev anthr
I'm not sure I understand your reply, I cannot tell if you are being
facetious or what
On 11/01/2011 04:44 PM, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
Den 01. nov. 2011 21:26, skrev anthropornis:
Will Canonical ever permit the user to disable the launcher so that
he or she can use the dock of their choic
Den 01. nov. 2011 22:15, skrev Tim Penhey:
On 02/11/11 09:44, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
Den 01. nov. 2011 21:26, skrev anthropornis:
Will Canonical ever permit the user to disable the launcher so that he
or she can use the dock of their choice (or something else altogether)?
Canonical has c
On 02/11/11 09:44, Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:
Den 01. nov. 2011 21:26, skrev anthropornis:
Will Canonical ever permit the user to disable the launcher so that he
or she can use the dock of their choice (or something else altogether)?
Canonical has chosen to permit 100% configurability. Is tha
Den 01. nov. 2011 22:09, skrev Mark Curtis:
> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 21:44:24 +0100
> From: joerlend.schins...@gmail.com
> To: ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Ayatana] option to disable Unity launcher
>
> Den 01. nov. 2011 21:26, skrev anthropornis:
> >
> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 21:44:24 +0100
> From: joerlend.schins...@gmail.com
> To: ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Ayatana] option to disable Unity launcher
>
> Den 01. nov. 2011 21:26, skrev anthropornis:
> >
> > Will Canonical ever permit the user t
>I don't follow this list consistently, so I am not clear on this, is it
a matter of the devs haven't gotten around to it yet, or is the design
team outright opposed to doing it?
i think it may be the first
> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:26:25 -0400
> Fro
Den 01. nov. 2011 21:26, skrev anthropornis:
Will Canonical ever permit the user to disable the launcher so that he
or she can use the dock of their choice (or something else altogether)?
Canonical has chosen to permit 100% configurability. Is that awesome, or
what?
Jo-Erlend Schinstad
__
13 matches
Mail list logo
