Ok, I just meant take one of this Tools and integrate some parts of it
in the system settings, like transparency or icon size...
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.ne
Why not provide some levels of abstraction before including tweaking tools
in 12.04
so that people who really know, go and change things with appropriate
restrictions and warnings :)
and let people who dont care or dont know what to do use the highest level
of abstraction?
that will settle doubts
Howdy,
I wrote an article for my local computer users group on customizing
Ubuntu to make it more pleasant to use. Some of these changes, such
as fixing the global menu really make a huge difference. If there is
a tweak program in place, I could add some of my fixes(my term), if
the maintainer
an ubuntu-tweak.
>
>
> http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/12/unity-tweak-tool-myunity-gets-new-look-coming-to-ubuntu-software-centre/
>
> --
> Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 16:16:24 -0400
> From: rolandi...@gmail.com
> To: lbsol...@yahoo.com
> CC: ayatana@lists.launchpad.n
Subject: Re: [Ayatana] Ubuntu Tweak
If Ubuntu-Tweak is broken in that manner, then why don't we fix it
and include it. I still don't see how your arguments against
inclusion are truly valid. For one thing, we can disable the
Computer Janitor plugin by default. F
made available only due to the generosity of SABDFL.
What's the problem?
--- On Sat, 12/17/11, Roland Taylor wrote:
From: Roland Taylor
Subject: Re: [Ayatana] Ubuntu Tweak
To: "Lance"
Cc: "ayatana"
Date: Saturday, December 17, 2011, 2:16 PM
If Ubuntu-
What exactly did you do to make compiz freeze like that?
Ubuntu-Tweak itself only changes options that exist with Compiz (as
would changing the options via gconf-editor). If compiz froze, it is a
problem with Compiz, not with Ubuntu-Tweak. Again, we can simply fix it
where it is broken, instea
ove using it to play with
themes in Gnome 3, regardless of DE, but it's far from mature enough
to be included in the repos.
--- On *Wed, 12/14/11, Roland Taylor //* wrote:
From: Roland Taylor
Subject: Re: [Ayatana] Ubuntu Tweak
To: ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Date: Wedne
of DE, but it's far from mature enough to be
> included in the repos.
>
> --- On *Wed, 12/14/11, Roland Taylor * wrote:
>
>
> From: Roland Taylor
> Subject: Re: [Ayatana] Ubuntu Tweak
> To: ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
> Date: Wednesday, December 14, 2011, 10:17 PM
&
e enough to be included in
the repos.
--- On Wed, 12/14/11, Roland Taylor wrote:
From: Roland Taylor
Subject: Re: [Ayatana] Ubuntu Tweak
To: ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Date: Wednesday, December 14, 2011, 10:17 PM
I respectfully disagree. The options that can be tweaked from Ubuntu Tweak and
Den 14. des. 2011 21:27, skrev Christian Rupp:
The options to change unity are very rarely installed by default...
Wouldn't it be nice to implement the tweaks options for apperance
somewhere in the system settings?
Ubuntu Tweak deserves the attention it is getting, but I hardly think
it's read
I respectfully disagree. The options that can be tweaked from Ubuntu
Tweak and similar tools (concerning Unity) will not break anything, and
for the most part can be changed on the fly (without restarting that is).
There is no reason not to include such a tool by default.
On 12/14/2011 05:00 P
I think the theory here is that users who want to do it generally know
(or can find out) how to install these tools, and those who could break
something won't have the option visible.
--
Ian Santopietro
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/n
13 matches
Mail list logo