El jue, 04-11-2010 a las 13:47 -0400, Bret Kuhns escribió:
[...]
> David's proposal creates a solution for easy switching by only
> hovering your mouse (or long-press touch). Per the mock-up, users
> already adept to using launchers to create multiple instances will be
> greeted with a "new insta
(sorry about the private reply goof *enables "Reply to all by default"
feature in Gmail*)
I asked, for examples, where the behaviour suggested was relevant.
I think my multiple terminal example is another valid case. Want to work on
multiple spreadsheets at a time? Text documents? Whether an app
(no point to write in pvt., maybe was a mistake, btw...)
I asked, for examples, where the behaviour suggested was relevant. I have
only be given one (Firefox) which I guess wasn't the best one. My personal
opinion is that we can't design for everyone or for every case, for this
reason it is import
Hello Christian,
In this specific example, a solution could be that Mozilla makes the buttons
> to open a new window, or open a new tab, more visible. It's important to
> draw a line from the responsabilities of the software and the operating
> system, and of course weight these corner cases.
>
I
Hi David,
This is an interesting corner case, thanks for pointing it out, could you
>> tell me some applications which are meant to be working in this way? I guess
>> in this case we could handle it via quick menu, just a thought.
>>
>
> For example, Firefox. My mom used to have a panel launcher t
Hello Christian
> Ah, now I think I understand what you mean. Well, this could be eventually
> the hint I was talking about.
>
Glad we're on the same page now.
> I wouldn't call workspace switcher "expose", it's more a zoom visual
> effect.
>
So we would have spread (hover on launcher), expos
>
> Hi David,
I'm not sure we're understanding each other here. When you mention expose
> there, are you talking about the same expose effect Unity does now when you
> click the workspace switcher? Or about the desktop spread I was proposing?
>
I mean expose like Compiz/MacOS expose, what Unity d
Hi Christian,
I personally think that expose could be too much of a change for a simply
> roll over action. This doesn't mean that we can't give a clue from the roll
> over to make the click=>expose more predictable.
>
I'm not sure we're understanding each other here. When you mention expose
ther
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:48 PM, David Prieto wrote:
> Consider that a user without a touch screen wouldn't even notice that the
> second method exists, since the spread would be there as soon as he hovered
> his cursor over the icon, without having to keep it pressed.
I personally think that ex
Christian, thanks for your reply:
Hi David, can you state a precise use case when this would be useful?
>
- For minimizing a window from the launcher. Right now you can restore
them but not minimize them, so the process lacks symmetry. Of course you can
minimize it from the titlebar butt
Hi David, can you state a precise use case when this would be useful?
Personally I think that showing the windows on mouse over is a bit heavy (on
your mock-up the application name is also missing). Being based on over
makes it not much touch friendly as well. I wonder if this problem can be
sorted
11 matches
Mail list logo
