Dear Frederik,
it almost seems like you want an inspiring term instead of the boring
"windows", independent of actual problems or solutions. How about
"crystal sphere views unto unicorn-filled landscapes"?
As long as we mainly use flat, 2d screens and usually work with
documents of rather flat co
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:56, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 06:55 +0100, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:
> > now here's a list of example solutions how one can design something
> > without
> > "window" in mind:
> > * OLPC's Sugar: http://www.collabora.co.uk/services/case-studies/o
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 06:55 +0100, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:
> now here's a list of example solutions how one can design something
> without
> "window" in mind:
> * OLPC's Sugar: http://www.collabora.co.uk/services/case-studies/olpc
> * Ubuntu's: http://blog.canonical.com/?p=379
> * http://ww
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 20:24, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 18:33 +0100, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> With all these words, you don't define any single, concrete problem with
> windows as they are.
>
Thank you for reading, i apologize again for being a bit blurry with my
I apologize !
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 20:24, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 18:33 +0100, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> *not too short a text*
>
> With all these words, you don't define any single, concrete problem with
> windows as they are. You don't make much of a case for
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 18:33 +0100, frederik.nn...@gmail.com wrote:
*not too short a text*
With all these words, you don't define any single, concrete problem with
windows as they are. You don't make much of a case for using another
metaphor for the same thing, as there are no obvious candidates t
6 matches
Mail list logo
