2010/5/21 Conscious User
>
> The combination thing is more or less my point: changing status is
> common, and responding to messages is common, what I don't think
> it's common is doing *both* as a reaction to a message (the
> "annoying message" scenario you brought up).
>
Annoying messages are
> > Part of messagING, as in "using an instant messenger", but not
> > part of messagES, as in "an usual action when sending or
> > receiving messages". The Message Menu deals with messagES.
>
> The name is Messaging Menu: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MessagingMenu/
> So I think you partly misundersto
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 14:44, Conscious User wrote:
> If you are receiving annoying messages, and changing your status
> stops them, then you were in the wrong status to begin with. :)
Why is half of the Me Menu made up of preference setting links?
Can't we put those somewhere else and link the
2010/5/21 Conscious User
>
> Part of messagING, as in "using an instant messenger", but not
> part of messagES, as in "an usual action when sending or
> receiving messages". The Message Menu deals with messagES.
The name is *Messaging Menu*: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MessagingMenu/
So I think you p
> Yes I know. But if I receive annoying messages from a place, I would
> stop them from the same place. This is the main point.
> I would control all messaging function from a menu, not two or more.
> Going offline or online is part of messaging.
Part of messagING, as in "using an instant messen
2010/5/21 Conscious User
>
> My two cents: I'm not particularly bothered by neither of those. I
> think the problem is that your thinking is application-based, while
> the indicators are functionality-based.
>
Yes I know. But if I receive annoying messages from a place, I would stop
them from t
> 1. If I want launch Empathy or Evolution, I can click on its icon in
> the message menu. But other application are in the standard GNOME
> application menu. So its a bit difficult for the user to understand
> why some applications are in a place and other application are in
> another place. But
2010/5/21 Mark Shuttleworth
> In Unity, we won't put Empathy in the launcher initially. We'll just
> have the messaging menu, where you would launch it. But if you want it
> in the launcher, you can put it there yourself. So the initial position
> is not inconsistent - it only becomes slightly in
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:38 AM, guido iodice wrote:
> 2. If I want open Empathy because I received a message, I must click on
> message menu. But if I want go offline, I must use the me menu. So we have
> two places to control the same program. Often I click on message menu
> searching a button t
On 21/05/10 09:38, guido iodice wrote:
> 1. If I want launch Empathy or Evolution, I can click on its icon in
> the message menu. But other application are in the standard GNOME
> application menu. So its a bit difficult for the user to understand
> why some applications are in a place and other ap
Dear all,
I think there is a inconsistency in the indicator menu and a inconsistency
with the rest of the gui.
1. If I want launch Empathy or Evolution, I can click on its icon in the
message menu. But other application are in the standard GNOME application
menu. So its a bit difficult for the us
11 matches
Mail list logo
