On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Tyler Brainerd wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Paolo Sammicheli wrote:
>
>> Alle 18:59 del 29/8/2010, Mark Curtis ha scritto:
>> > I don't see anything in that post on design.canonical.com that says the
>> background is
>> > temporary. Though I did s
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Paolo Sammicheli wrote:
> Alle 18:59 del 29/8/2010, Mark Curtis ha scritto:
> > I don't see anything in that post on design.canonical.com that says the
> background is
> > temporary. Though I did see in the comments the only mention of the
> background, and it
> >
Alle 18:59 del 29/8/2010, Mark Curtis ha scritto:
> I don't see anything in that post on design.canonical.com that says the
> background is
> temporary. Though I did see in the comments the only mention of the
> background, and it
> wasn't a favorable one.
The author of the blog post, Andrea Cim
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 12:59 -0400, Mark Curtis wrote:
> I don't see anything in that post on design.canonical.com that says
> the background is temporary.
And if it is, why not write a little remark in the changelog or, better,
embedded into the wallpaper image itself.
So?
To me it just means more people are following the development of future
versions of Ubuntu.
As for staying on topic about the Background (not OMG Ubuntu). I don't see
anything in that post on design.canonical.com that says the background is
temporary. Though I did see in the comments the on
> Backlash? Where?
> Are we now considering the above mentioned blog as a representative of
> the whole Ubuntu community? (...)
Of course not, when did I say that?
I'm comparing the current situation with previous ones about
wallpapers that also included blogs, and I'm also considering
the size
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 08:23 -0300, Conscious User wrote:
> Hello,
(...)
> Personally, I must admit I have never seem such a heavy
> backlash before. It is very common to see people not liking
> the default wallpaper, but this time there was a substantial
> number of people that simply did not care
Hello,
Some of you might be already aware of the controversy caused
by the (supposed) new default wallpaper:
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/08/ubuntu-1010-default-wallpaper.html
http://humphreybc.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/the-joke-that-is-mavericks-default-wallpaper/
https://bugs.launchpad.net/u
8 matches
Mail list logo
