On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Vishal Rao wrote:
> I believe "LTS" just means "Long Term Supported" and not necessarily
> more or less "stable" :-)
During the development cycle for a LTS release, we know that we will
be supporting it for a long time. As a result, we are more cautious
with the ch
On 3 April 2010 16:37, Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII)
wrote:
> Reading the Wiki, it sounds a lot like stability is the goal of an LTS.
True that, and I think this is for the first time with Lucid? (that
the release schedule and wiki were updated?)
I wonder if I'm mistaken in reading some forum po
Reading the Wiki, it sounds a lot like stability *is *the goal of an LTS.
>From the Ubuntu Wiki(I've added the red for emphasis):
Release Plan Details
>
>1.
>
>We are more conservative in our package merge with Debian,
>auto-synching with Debian *testing*, instead of Debian unstable.
I believe "LTS" just means "Long Term Supported" and not necessarily
more or less "stable" :-)
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
More help : https://h
I think this is a great idea! However I would furthermore consider
calling the LTS a Release Candidate (RC) for the first 6 months to
allow for some stabilization where only must-fix things that didn't
meet the 6 month deadline and security fixes get included. Sort of
like waiting on Microsoft for
I think we should use the website redesign as an opportunity to promote the
LTS over the regular releases. We get a lot of complaints from new users in
the forums, who complain that the standard releases aren't stable enough for
them. I think promoting the LTS more would alleviate this problem.
At
6 matches
Mail list logo
