On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 13/12/10 17:17, Spike Burch wrote:
>> What I would do, although this is duplicating effort in the long run,
>> is write a 2d version of unity using EFL, just like they did with the
>> old netbook interface
>
> That's what I would do too
On 13/12/10 17:17, Spike Burch wrote:
> What I would do, although this is duplicating effort in the long run,
> is write a 2d version of unity using EFL, just like they did with the
> old netbook interface
That's what I would do too :-)
For 11.04, the focus is on getting Unity-with-GL as good as
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Mark Curtis wrote:
> Unity requires 3d compositing. For those without adequate hardware, it
> falls back to the GNOME Panels. While I understand for this cycle effort
> should be put into getting Unity functioning, I think for the future a
> better fallback sh
In case you don't have compositing at all, Cairo-Dock can run with fake
transparency; however, including a third-party application just to handle a
fallback seems a bit heavy, especially since the gnome-panel is already
included in Ubuntu/Gnome.
2010/12/13 Roth Robert
> Metacity does have compos
Metacity does have compositing, and I've read that Docky works with metacity
compositing. That could do it, if we need a dock-like interface imitating
Unity, but I also think that the classic two gnome-panels is a really good
fallback, for legacy users and users who don't like nor the Gnome Shell
n
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 19:18, frederik.nn...@gmail.com <
frederik.nn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> pss
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 17:45, frederik.nn...@gmail.com <
> frederik.nn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 17:35, Mark Curtis wrote:
>>
>>> Unity requires 3
--- On Mon, 12/13/10, Mark Curtis wrote:
From: Mark Curtis
Subject: [Ayatana] Graceful degradation of Unity
To: "Ayatana Mailing List"
Date: Monday, December 13, 2010, 10:35 AM
Unity requires 3d compositing. For those without adequate hardware, it falls
back to the GNOME Panels
e: [Ayatana] Graceful degradation of Unity
> From: spi...@gmail.com
> To: ryanpr...@gmail.com
> CC: merkin...@hotmail.com; ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
>
> I don't think it is something that needs to be done now either. I
> think the ideal time to revisit the idea is probably d
I don't think it is something that needs to be done now either. I
think the ideal time to revisit the idea is probably during the next
LTS cycle. That gives Unity time time to mature and become part of the
brand identity. If it takes hold, then we should definitely revisit
the issue for such an imp
pss
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 17:45, frederik.nn...@gmail.com <
frederik.nn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 17:35, Mark Curtis wrote:
>
>> Unity requires 3d compositing. For those without adequate hardware, it
>> falls back to the GNOME Panels. While I understa
What I would do, although this is duplicating effort in the long run,
is write a 2d version of unity using EFL, just like they did with the
old netbook interface
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Mark Curtis wrote:
> Unity requires 3d compositing. For those without adequate hardware, it
> falls
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Mark Curtis wrote:
> Unity requires 3d compositing. For those without adequate hardware, it
> falls back to the GNOME Panels. While I understand for this cycle effort
> should be put into getting Unity functioning, I think for the future a
> better fallback shou
Hi Mark,
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 17:35, Mark Curtis wrote:
> Unity requires 3d compositing. For those without adequate hardware, it
> falls back to the GNOME Panels. While I understand for this cycle effort
> should be put into getting Unity functioning, I think for the future a
> better fall
Unity requires 3d compositing. For those without adequate hardware, it falls
back to the GNOME Panels. While I understand for this cycle effort should be
put into getting Unity functioning, I think for the future a better fallback
should be created. For one the GNOME Panels won't be supported
14 matches
Mail list logo
